Massachusetts School and District Profiles

East Longmeadow High

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - East Longmeadow High

Organization Information

District:

East Longmeadow (00870000)

School type:

High School

School:

East Longmeadow High (00870505)

Grades served:

09,10,11,12

Region:

Pioneer Valley

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		96.4	99.0	98.9	-0.1	97.9	98.2	66	207	100	Above Target
High needs		89.6	97.3	96.3	-1.0	93.9	94.8	62	61	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		96.9	96.9	99.1	2.2	97.2	98.5	91	29	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		87.2	96.8	93.2	-3.6	92.5	93.6	55	33	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		96.3	99.2	99.3	0.1	97.8	98.2	65	183	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		94.1	92.9	95.1	2.2	96.6	97.1	67	208	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		83.5	83.1	84.3	1.2	90.4	91.8	59	62	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		86.6	86.6	95.0	8.4	87.7	93.3	92	30	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		81.3	80.3	74.2	-6.1	89.1	90.7	55	33	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		94.2	93.1	95.5	2.4	96.6	97.1	61	184	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		94.7	92.5	94.7	2.2	96.9	97.4	68	201	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		87.9	84.2	83.8	-0.4	92.9	94.0	50	57	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		85.9	85.9	92.0	6.1	87.1	93.0	85	28	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		85.0	80.6	75.0	-5.6	91.3	92.5	46	31	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		95.2	92.9	95.1	2.2	97.2	97.6	62	180	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	50.2	53.6	207	0	0.0	0.0	207	25
High needs	28.0	31.1	61	25	0.0	0.0	61	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	35.0	51.7	29	25	0.0	0.0	29	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Students w/ disabilities	19.1	15.2	33	0	0.0	0.0	33	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	51.6	53.6	183	0	0.0	0.0	183	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	48.7	47.6	208	0	1.8	1.9	208	0
High needs	27.7	25.8	62	0	4.8	6.5	62	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	22.0	46.7	30	25	2.4	0.0	30	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Students w/ disabilities	29.8	6.1	33	0	6.4	12.1	33	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	50.5	47.3	184	0	1.6	2.2	184	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	28.6	28.9	201	0	0.5	0.0	201	25
High needs	15.1	14.0	57	0	0.0	0.0	57	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	15.6	14.3	28	0	0.0	0.0	28	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Students w/ disabilities	13.3	12.9	31	0	0.0	0.0	31	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	26.9	28.9	180	0	0.5	0.0	180	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		41.0	51.5	10.5	51.0	No	196	75	On Target
High needs		37.0	51.5	14.5	51.0	No	58	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		38.0	52.0	14.0	51.0	Yes	28	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		36.0	48.0	12.0	51.0	No	32	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		41.0	51.5	10.5	51.0	Yes	174	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		49.0	50.0	1.0	51.0	Yes	197	75	On Target
High needs		49.0	49.0	0.0	51.0	Yes	59	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		59.5	68.0	8.5	51.0	Yes	29	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		45.0	44.5	-0.5	51.0	No	32	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		47.0	47.0	0.0	51.0	Yes	175	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	6.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	6.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	6.00	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		96.6	96.2	-0.4	80.0	90.0	209	100	Above Target
High needs		91.7	91.6	-0.1	80.0	90.0	83	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		90.0	89.8	-0.2	80.0	90.0	49	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	6	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
White		97.8	96.8	-1.0	80.0	90.0	188	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		98.6	96.6	-2.0	85.0	95.0	206	100	Above Target
High needs		97.5	91.7	-5.8	85.0	95.0	72	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		98.2	90.0	-8.2	85.0	95.0	40	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
White		98.5	97.8	-0.7	85.0	95.0	182	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		0.7	0.5	0.8	-0.3	0.4	0.4	58	874	25	No Change
High needs		0.9	1.1	2.5	-1.4	0.5	0.5	42	243	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		2.9	-	-	-	-	1.5	-	103	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		1.1	0.0	2.6	-2.6	0.6	0.6	44	153	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	40	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	22	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	32	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		0.5	0.5	0.9	-0.4	0.3	0.3	44	777	25	No Change

Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more) About the Data
	2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged	PPI Points
All students	-	-
High needs	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	211	209	99	Yes	211	210	100	Yes	211	211	100	Yes
High needs	65	63	97	Yes	65	64	98	Yes	65	65	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	32	31	97	Yes	32	32	100	Yes	32	32	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	34	33	97	Yes	34	33	97	Yes	34	34	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	7	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	185	184	99	Yes	185	185	100	Yes	185	185	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.