Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Dracut Senior High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Dracut Senior High

Organization Information
District:Dracut (00790000)School type:High School
School:Dracut Senior High (00790505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 98.1, Target = 98.6CPI = 98.1, Target = 98.6 97.6 97.9 98.1 0.2 98.6 98.8 51185100Above Target
High needsCPI = 89.2, Target = 92.9CPI = 89.2, Target = 92.9CPI = 89.2, Target = 92.9 87.9 93.6 89.2 -4.4 92.9 94.0 14300Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 97.9, Target = 99.2CPI = 97.9, Target = 99.2CPI = 97.9, Target = 99.2 98.6 97.4 97.9 0.5 99.2 99.3 30157100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.3, Target = 95.9CPI = 93.3, Target = 95.9CPI = 93.3, Target = 95.9 92.9 91.3 93.3 2.0 95.9 96.5 5918250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 76.8, Target = 83.8CPI = 76.8, Target = 83.8CPI = 76.8, Target = 83.8 72.3 77.1 76.8 -0.3 83.8 86.2 262825No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.5, Target = 96.8CPI = 92.5, Target = 96.8CPI = 92.5, Target = 96.8 94.5 90.7 92.5 1.8 96.8 97.3 3915450Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.3, Target = 95.2CPI = 94.3, Target = 95.2 91.8 92.4 94.3 1.9 95.2 95.9 6417475On Target
High needsCPI = 76.7, Target = 85.9CPI = 76.7, Target = 85.9CPI = 76.7, Target = 85.9 75.9 76.9 76.7 -0.2 85.9 88.0 232925No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.8, Target = 95.7CPI = 93.8, Target = 95.7CPI = 93.8, Target = 95.7 92.7 92.3 93.8 1.5 95.7 96.4 4914950Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 42.2 60.518525 1.1 0.518525
High needs 19.1 46.73025 4.3 3.33025
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--13---13-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 44.9 58.015725 1.4 0.615725
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 48.1 70.318225 6.1 3.818225
High needs 22.9 39.32825 18.8 21.4280
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--11---11-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 52.0 69.515425 6.8 3.915425
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 25.0 43.717425 4.9 2.317425
High needs 10.3 24.12925 17.9 13.82925
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 27.7 42.314925 5.1 2.714925
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 57.0 58.0 1.0 51.0No16475On Target
High needsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 48.0 60.0 12.0 51.0No24100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-15--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-8--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 55.0 56.0 1.0 51.0No13975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 73.5, Target = 51SGP = 73.5, Target = 51SGP = 73.5, Target = 51 68.0 73.5 5.5 51.0Yes162100Above Target
High needsSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 64.5 52.0 -12.5 51.0Yes2375On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-15--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-8--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 74, Target = 51SGP = 74, Target = 51SGP = 74, Target = 51 66.5 74.0 7.5 51.0No137100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.04-
High needs- 60.04-
EL and Former EL- 60.04-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 91.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.2, Target = 80 90.9 91.2 0.3 80.0 90.025075On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 78.3, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 78.3, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 78.3, Target = 80 81.6 78.3 -3.3 80.0 90.0690Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.018--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.09--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.011--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.09--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.03--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 91.3, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.3, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.3, Target = 80 90.6 91.3 0.7 80.0 90.021875On Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 91.2, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.2, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.2, Target = 85 87.2 91.2 4.0 85.0 95.027475On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 81.6, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 81.6, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 81.6, Target = 85 68.7 81.6 12.9 85.0 95.07650Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.05--
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.026--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.013--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.012--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.016--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 91, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 91, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 91, Target = 85 87.3 91.0 3.7 85.0 95.023375On Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 1.8, Target = 0.9 1.5 2.4 1.8 0.6 0.9 0.83585650Improved Below Target
High needsDropout Rate = 4.6, Target = 2.2 3.7 5.0 4.6 0.4 2.2 1.92215125No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------103--
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilities -------61--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------35--
Afr. Amer./Black -------32--
Hispanic/Latino -------39--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteDropout Rate = 1.6, Target = 0.9 1.5 2.3 1.6 0.7 0.9 0.82774050Improved Below Target
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students18918899Yes18818598Yes18818799Yes
High needs323197Yes322995Yes323197Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged19---19---19---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities14---14---14---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian8---8---8---
Afr. Amer./Black4---4---4---
Hispanic/Latino13---13---13---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.4---4---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White16015999Yes15915698Yes15915899Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles