Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Joseph A Campbell Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Joseph A Campbell Elementary
Organization Information
District:Dracut (00790000)School type:Elementary School
School:Joseph A Campbell Elementary (00790020)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.9, Target = 91.7CPI = 84.9, Target = 91.7CPI = 84.9, Target = 91.7 85.8 83.5 84.9 1.4 91.7 92.9 4725150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 71.9, Target = 83.1CPI = 71.9, Target = 83.1CPI = 71.9, Target = 83.1 71.0 70.4 71.9 1.5 83.1 85.5 317250Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 85.9, Target = 82.3CPI = 85.9, Target = 82.3CPI = 85.9, Target = 82.3 80.7 80.7 85.9 5.2 82.3 90.4 8839100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 59.5, Target = 71.5CPI = 59.5, Target = 71.5CPI = 59.5, Target = 71.5 51.2 57.1 59.5 2.4 71.5 75.6 344250Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.6, Target = 92.2CPI = 84.6, Target = 92.2CPI = 84.6, Target = 92.2 86.7 83.9 84.6 0.7 92.2 93.4 3022250Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 77.9, Target = 89.8CPI = 77.9, Target = 89.8CPI = 77.9, Target = 89.8 82.5 80.2 77.9 -2.3 89.8 91.3 2125125No Change
High needsCPI = 63, Target = 81.9CPI = 63, Target = 81.9CPI = 63, Target = 81.9 69.0 62.7 63.0 0.3 81.9 84.5 97150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 75.6, Target = 75.5CPI = 75.6, Target = 75.5 73.3 73.3 75.6 2.3 75.5 86.7 453975On Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 52.4, Target = 71.5CPI = 52.4, Target = 71.5CPI = 52.4, Target = 71.5 51.2 43.6 52.4 8.8 71.5 75.6 184150Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 77.5, Target = 90.1CPI = 77.5, Target = 90.1CPI = 77.5, Target = 90.1 83.0 79.7 77.5 -2.2 90.1 91.5 1022225No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 78.4, Target = 81.5CPI = 78.4, Target = 81.5CPI = 78.4, Target = 81.5 79.8 79.8 78.4 -1.4 81.5 89.9 418025No Change
High needs -------19--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------12--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 78.8, Target = 81.1CPI = 78.8, Target = 81.1CPI = 78.8, Target = 81.1 79.4 79.4 78.8 -0.6 81.1 89.7 267225No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 13.7 13.52510 7.8 6.425125
High needs 3.9 5.67225 17.1 19.4720
Econ. Disadvantaged 6.3 7.73925 6.3 7.7390
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 2.44225 31.4 31.0420
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--16---16-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 12.0 13.12220 7.1 7.22220
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 23.0 15.52510 12.3 12.72510
High needs 8.2 8.5710 32.9 28.27125
Econ. Disadvantaged 8.9 10.33925 15.6 10.33925
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 5.7 4.9410 60.0 41.54125
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--16---16-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 22.5 14.02220 12.2 13.12220
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 16.4 13.8800 8.2 7.5800
High needs--19---19-
Econ. Disadvantaged--12---12-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--11---11-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 12.9 15.37225 9.7 8.37225
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 54.0 60.0 6.0 51.0No153100Above Target
High needsSGP = 48.5, Target = 51SGP = 48.5, Target = 51SGP = 48.5, Target = 51 52.0 48.5 -3.5 51.0No3850Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-21--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 56.0 60.0 4.0 51.0No135100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 56.0 58.0 2.0 51.0No15375On Target
High needsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 51.5 49.0 -2.5 51.0No3750Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-21--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 60.5 58.0 -2.5 51.0No13575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.05-
High needs- 60.05-
EL and Former EL- 60.05-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students259258100Yes259258100Yes8383100Yes
High needs7777100Yes777699Yes20---
Econ. Disadvantaged4242100Yes4242100Yes12---
EL and Former EL3---3-------
Students w/ disabilities4444100Yes444398Yes12---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian7---7---1---
Afr. Amer./Black5---5---1---
Hispanic/Latino16---16---5---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White229228100Yes229228100Yes7474100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles