Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Deerfield Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Deerfield Elementary
Organization Information
District:Deerfield (00740000)School type:Elementary School
School:Deerfield Elementary (00740015)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:Pioneer ValleyTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.8, Target = 94.5CPI = 87.8, Target = 94.5CPI = 87.8, Target = 94.5 90.6 87.7 87.8 0.1 94.5 95.3 6023150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 73.1, Target = 88.7CPI = 73.1, Target = 88.7CPI = 73.1, Target = 88.7 80.7 70.6 73.1 2.5 88.7 90.4 377950Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 77.3, Target = 78.3CPI = 77.3, Target = 78.3 76.3 76.3 77.3 1.0 78.3 88.2 524475On Target
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 60.4, Target = 87CPI = 60.4, Target = 87CPI = 60.4, Target = 87 77.7 57.7 60.4 2.7 87.0 88.9 384850Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.6, Target = 94.7CPI = 88.6, Target = 94.7CPI = 88.6, Target = 94.7 90.9 87.9 88.6 0.7 94.7 95.5 5220950Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 77.8, Target = 90.3CPI = 77.8, Target = 90.3CPI = 77.8, Target = 90.3 83.3 84.1 77.8 -6.3 90.3 91.7 212320Declined
High needsCPI = 58.2, Target = 81.5CPI = 58.2, Target = 81.5CPI = 58.2, Target = 81.5 68.2 64.9 58.2 -6.7 81.5 84.1 3790Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 62.5, Target = 71.7CPI = 62.5, Target = 71.7CPI = 62.5, Target = 71.7 69.1 69.1 62.5 -6.6 71.7 84.6 8440Declined
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 43.2, Target = 79.2CPI = 43.2, Target = 79.2CPI = 43.2, Target = 79.2 64.4 54.8 43.2 -11.6 79.2 82.2 7480Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 79, Target = 90.7CPI = 79, Target = 90.7CPI = 79, Target = 90.7 84.0 84.8 79.0 -5.8 90.7 92.0 122100Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.2, Target = 93.5CPI = 83.2, Target = 93.5CPI = 83.2, Target = 93.5 88.9 87.7 83.2 -4.5 93.5 94.5 58610Declined
High needs  79.0---- 89.5-23--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------12--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 82.9, Target = 94.2CPI = 82.9, Target = 94.2CPI = 82.9, Target = 94.2 90.0 88.3 82.9 -5.4 94.2 95.0 38570Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 20.3 16.92310 7.2 4.323125
High needs 7.6 10.17925 20.3 12.77925
Econ. Disadvantaged 15.8 18.24425 15.8 13.64425
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0480 30.8 20.84825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.6 17.72090 7.4 4.320925
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 27.4 15.12320 8.3 15.12320
High needs 11.4 11.4790 24.1 40.5790
Econ. Disadvantaged 15.8 11.4440 18.4 38.6440
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities 3.8 4.24825 36.5 60.4480
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 29.4 15.72100 8.2 13.82100
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 33.3 32.8610 4.8 9.8610
High needs--23---23-
Econ. Disadvantaged--12---12-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--14---14-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 35.0 31.6570 5.0 10.5570
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 58.0 48.0 -10.0 51.0No17250Below Target
High needsSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 48.0 41.0 -7.0 51.0No5550Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51 50.5 34.5 -16.0 51.0No3025Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 47.0 41.0 -6.0 51.0No3550Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51 58.0 46.5 -11.5 51.0No15650Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51 54.0 28.0 -26.0 51.0No1730Below Target
High needsSGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51 54.0 32.0 -22.0 51.0No5525Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 33.5, Target = 51SGP = 33.5, Target = 51SGP = 33.5, Target = 51 60.0 33.5 -26.5 51.0No3025Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51 51.5 32.0 -19.5 51.0No3525Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51 54.0 28.0 -26.0 51.0No1560Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.03-
High needs- 60.03-
EL and Former EL- 60.03-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students232231100Yes232232100Yes626198Yes
High needs7979100Yes7979100Yes2323100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged4444100Yes4444100Yes12---
EL and Former EL5---5-------
Students w/ disabilities4848100Yes4848100Yes14---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian3---3---1---
Afr. Amer./Black1---1-------
Hispanic/Latino9---9---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.9---9-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White210209100Yes210210100Yes585798Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles