Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Dedham High

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Dedham High

Organization Information

District:

Dedham (00730000)

School type:

High School

School:

Dedham High (00730505)

Grades served:

09,10,11,12

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		95.6	98.6	98.4	-0.2	97.4	97.8	56	155	100	Above Target
High needs		91.0	95.9	95.5	-0.4	94.8	95.5	55	50	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		95.9	95.9	93.8	-2.1	96.2	98.0	31	28	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		89.5	-	-	-	-	94.8	-	26	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		96.9	99.6	99.5	-0.1	98.2	98.5	74	109	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		95.3	96.9	97.6	0.7	97.3	97.7	87	154	100	Above Target
High needs		90.6	91.3	93.5	2.2	94.5	95.3	93	50	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		93.1	93.1	93.8	0.7	93.7	96.6	87	28	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		83.3	-	-	-	-	91.7	-	26	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		97.6	98.6	98.6	0.0	98.6	98.8	91	109	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		94.6	96.1	94.7	-1.4	96.9	97.3	68	147	25	No Change
High needs		88.2	91.2	86.2	-5.0	93.1	94.1	60	47	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		92.1	92.1	86.0	-6.1	92.8	96.1	57	25	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		79.8	-	-	-	-	89.9	-	26	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		95.9	97.4	96.6	-0.8	97.6	98.0	73	102	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	53.6	41.3	155	0	0.6	0.0	155	25
High needs	31.1	20.0	50	0	1.6	0.0	50	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	37.8	21.4	28	0	2.7	0.0	28	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	26	-	-	-	26	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	57.3	45.0	109	0	0.0	0.0	109	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	74.0	72.7	154	0	2.3	0.6	154	25
High needs	48.3	44.0	50	0	6.7	2.0	50	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	66.7	57.1	28	0	5.6	3.6	28	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	26	-	-	-	26	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	81.3	77.1	109	0	0.8	0.0	109	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	49.4	37.4	147	0	0.0	0.0	147	25
High needs	22.2	19.1	47	0	0.0	0.0	47	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	31.4	24.0	25	0	0.0	0.0	25	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	26	-	-	-	26	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	52.6	40.2	102	0	0.0	0.0	102	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		35.0	42.0	7.0	51.0	No	145	50	Below Target
High needs		38.0	32.5	-5.5	51.0	No	44	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	24	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	24	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		31.5	42.5	11.0	51.0	No	104	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		67.5	66.0	-1.5	51.0	No	145	100	Above Target
High needs		71.0	77.0	6.0	51.0	No	44	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	24	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	24	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		68.0	66.0	-2.0	51.0	No	104	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	12.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	12.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	12.00	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		94.1	90.1	-4.0	80.0	90.0	181	75	On Target
High needs		89.1	86.0	-3.1	80.0	90.0	93	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	13	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		89.1	80.0	-9.1	80.0	90.0	40	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	17	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	21	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
White		98.1	91.9	-6.2	80.0	90.0	136	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		93.1	96.4	3.3	85.0	95.0	220	100	Above Target
High needs		88.1	92.7	4.6	85.0	95.0	110	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	14	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		84.2	91.3	7.1	85.0	95.0	46	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	26	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	21	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
White		95.4	99.4	4.0	85.0	95.0	160	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		1.4	1.3	1.1	0.2	0.8	0.7	48	700	25	No Change
High needs		1.3	2.7	3.1	-0.4	0.8	0.7	35	228	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		3.5	-	-	-	-	1.8	-	115	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	38	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		0.7	8.4	3.6	4.8	0.4	0.4	33	110	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	28	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	69	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	93	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		1.3	0.5	0.6	-0.1	0.8	0.7	56	496	75	On Target

Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more) About the Data
	2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged	PPI Points
All students	-	-
High needs	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	161	161	100	Yes	161	160	99	Yes	161	161	100	Yes
High needs	56	56	100	Yes	56	56	100	Yes	56	56	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	32	32	100	Yes	32	32	100	Yes	32	32	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	14	-	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	27	27	100	Yes	27	27	100	Yes	27	27	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	9	-	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	17	-	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	21	-	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	110	110	100	Yes	110	110	100	Yes	110	110	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.