Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Dedham Middle School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Dedham Middle School

Organization Information

District:

Dedham (00730000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Dedham Middle School (00730305)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		92.8	89.8	90.1	0.3	95.8	96.4	49	655	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		84.8	76.9	75.7	-1.2	91.1	92.4	30	227	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		87.3	87.3	84.9	-2.4	88.4	93.7	56	114	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		83.8	78.1	70.2	-7.9	90.6	91.9	44	21	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		75.2	64.1	65.9	1.8	85.5	87.6	40	146	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		78.9	84.4	85.3	0.9	87.7	89.5	70	46	50	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		89.6	82.6	81.9	-0.7	93.9	94.8	52	94	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		94.4	91.3	92.4	1.1	96.7	97.2	51	485	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		81.0	84.1	80.9	-3.2	88.9	90.5	56	653	0	Declined
High needs		67.5	65.4	59.3	-6.1	81.0	83.8	29	227	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		75.0	75.0	72.4	-2.6	77.1	87.5	67	114	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		64.9	64.1	60.7	-3.4	79.5	82.5	56	21	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		53.8	50.2	45.7	-4.5	73.1	76.9	35	146	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		61.5	71.9	71.7	-0.2	77.5	80.8	80	46	25	No Change
Hispanic/Latino		73.9	66.8	64.6	-2.2	84.8	87.0	47	94	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		83.1	87.9	84.9	-3.0	90.1	91.6	63	483	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		69.0	78.8	70.5	-8.3	81.9	84.5	35	228	0	Declined
High needs		56.5	66.2	52.4	-13.8	74.6	78.3	17	84	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		72.7	72.7	59.6	-13.1	75.0	86.4	38	47	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		47.5	51.5	42.4	-9.1	69.4	73.8	18	46	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		53.4	-	-	-	-	76.7	-	32	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		70.8	80.8	75.3	-5.5	83.0	85.4	36	169	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	15.6	18.2	655	25	4.8	6.0	655	0
High needs	6.7	7.0	227	0	13.3	15.9	227	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	10.8	10.5	114	0	4.6	9.6	114	0
EL and Former EL	6.3	0.0	21	0	9.4	14.3	21	0
Students w/ disabilities	2.3	2.7	146	25	22.9	23.3	146	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Afr. Amer./Black	14.6	15.2	46	0	8.3	6.5	46	25
Hispanic/Latino	6.3	11.7	94	25	7.6	13.8	94	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	16.7	20.0	485	25	4.0	4.1	485	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	33.6	30.8	653	0	10.6	15.8	653	0
High needs	14.3	10.6	227	0	26.9	38.3	227	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	21.1	13.2	114	0	16.4	22.8	114	0
EL and Former EL	12.5	19.0	21	25	21.9	38.1	21	0
Students w/ disabilities	3.8	4.1	146	0	46.2	55.5	146	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Afr. Amer./Black	29.2	17.4	46	0	22.9	21.7	46	0
Hispanic/Latino	12.7	17.0	94	25	24.1	30.9	94	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	36.3	35.0	483	0	7.2	12.2	483	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	2.4	6.6	228	25	6.7	17.1	228	0
High needs	1.4	1.2	84	0	18.9	34.5	84	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	2.3	2.1	47	0	13.6	25.5	47	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	46	0	35.3	43.5	46	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	32	-	-	-	32	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	2.6	8.3	169	25	5.2	11.8	169	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		43.0	45.5	2.5	51.0	No	632	50	Below Target
High needs		43.0	41.0	-2.0	51.0	No	215	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		44.5	41.0	-3.5	51.0	No	109	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		43.5	38.0	-5.5	51.0	No	138	25	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		57.5	39.5	-18.0	51.0	No	42	25	Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		44.0	46.0	2.0	51.0	No	89	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	17	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		42.0	44.0	2.0	51.0	Yes	471	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		47.0	39.0	-8.0	51.0	No	629	25	Below Target
High needs		43.0	33.5	-9.5	51.0	No	214	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		47.0	38.5	-8.5	51.0	No	110	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		37.0	26.5	-10.5	51.0	No	136	0	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		54.0	43.0	-11.0	51.0	No	43	50	Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		52.0	38.0	-14.0	51.0	No	89	25	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		47.0	38.5	-8.5	51.0	No	468	25	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	15.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	15.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	15.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	674	668	99	Yes	674	666	99	Yes	231	230	100	Yes
High needs	242	239	99	Yes	242	239	99	Yes	86	86	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	124	121	98	Yes	124	121	98	Yes	48	48	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	26	26	100	Yes	26	26	100	Yes	7	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	151	151	100	Yes	151	151	100	Yes	47	47	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	14	-	-	-	14	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	50	50	100	Yes	50	50	100	Yes	21	21	100	Yes
Hispanic/Latino	103	101	98	Yes	103	101	98	Yes	33	33	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	18	-	-	-	18	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	489	486	99	Yes	489	484	99	Yes	170	169	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.