Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Riverdale
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Riverdale
Organization Information
District:Dedham (00730000)School type:Elementary School
School:Riverdale (00730045)Grades served:01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.6, Target = 90.6CPI = 84.6, Target = 90.6CPI = 84.6, Target = 90.6 83.9 88.6 84.6 -4.0 90.6 92.0 451090Declined
High needsCPI = 77.3, Target = 85.2CPI = 77.3, Target = 85.2CPI = 77.3, Target = 85.2 74.6 78.7 77.3 -1.4 85.2 87.3 585525No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 82.3, Target = 88.1CPI = 82.3, Target = 88.1CPI = 82.3, Target = 88.1 87.0 87.0 82.3 -4.7 88.1 93.5 76310Declined
EL and Former EL -------15--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 66.7, Target = 80.3CPI = 66.7, Target = 80.3CPI = 66.7, Target = 80.3 66.3 69.4 66.7 -2.7 80.3 83.2 56300Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.4, Target = 91.4CPI = 87.4, Target = 91.4CPI = 87.4, Target = 91.4 85.3 88.5 87.4 -1.1 91.4 92.7 478725No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.3, Target = 93.5CPI = 85.3, Target = 93.5CPI = 85.3, Target = 93.5 88.8 87.1 85.3 -1.8 93.5 94.4 4910925No Change
High needsCPI = 75.9, Target = 89.1CPI = 75.9, Target = 89.1CPI = 75.9, Target = 89.1 81.3 80.3 75.9 -4.4 89.1 90.7 50550Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 77.4, Target = 84.4CPI = 77.4, Target = 84.4CPI = 77.4, Target = 84.4 83.0 83.0 77.4 -5.6 84.4 91.5 53310Declined
EL and Former EL -------15--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 62.5, Target = 84.3CPI = 62.5, Target = 84.3CPI = 62.5, Target = 84.3 73.1 71.3 62.5 -8.8 84.3 86.6 43300Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.1, Target = 94.1CPI = 87.1, Target = 94.1CPI = 87.1, Target = 94.1 89.8 86.8 87.1 0.3 94.1 94.9 448750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.3, Target = 88CPI = 83.3, Target = 88CPI = 83.3, Target = 88 79.5 93.9 83.3 -10.6 88.0 89.8 58330Declined
High needs -------16--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------9--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83.7, Target = 88.1CPI = 83.7, Target = 88.1CPI = 83.7, Target = 88.1 79.6 95.2 83.7 -11.5 88.1 89.8 44260Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 14.3 15.61090 3.8 6.41090
High needs 10.6 12.75525 8.5 10.9550
Econ. Disadvantaged 20.0 19.4310 4.0 9.7310
EL and Former EL--15---15-
Students w/ disabilities 3.7 3.3300 14.8 16.7300
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 13.5 14.98725 4.5 4.6870
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 23.8 34.910925 3.8 11.91090
High needs 14.9 32.75525 8.5 21.8550
Econ. Disadvantaged 24.0 41.93125 8.0 19.4310
EL and Former EL--15---15-
Students w/ disabilities 3.7 10.03025 14.8 36.7300
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 23.6 36.88725 4.5 9.2870
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 16.2 33.33325 0.0 9.1330
High needs--16---16-
Econ. Disadvantaged--9---9-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 16.1 34.62625 0.0 11.5260
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51 47.5 36.0 -11.5 51.0No7125Below Target
High needsSGP = 38.5, Target = 51SGP = 38.5, Target = 51SGP = 38.5, Target = 51 45.0 38.5 -6.5 51.0No3625Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-10--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 44.0 42.0 -2.0 51.0No5750Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 43.0 43.0 0.0 51.0No7150Below Target
High needsSGP = 40.5, Target = 51SGP = 40.5, Target = 51SGP = 40.5, Target = 51 48.5 40.5 -8.0 51.0No3650Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-10--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 38.5 49.0 10.5 51.0Yes5775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.015-
High needs- 60.015-
EL and Former EL- 60.015-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students116116100Yes116116100Yes3535100Yes
High needs6262100Yes6262100Yes18---
Econ. Disadvantaged3636100Yes3636100Yes10---
EL and Former EL20---20---4---
Students w/ disabilities3131100Yes3131100Yes11---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1---1---
Asian3---3---1---
Afr. Amer./Black6---6---3---
Hispanic/Latino16---16---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.1---1-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White8989100Yes8989100Yes2626100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles