Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Greenlodge

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Greenlodge

Organization Information

District:

Dedham (00730000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Greenlodge (00730025)

Grades served:

01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		88.7	95.7	91.8	-3.9	93.4	94.4	78	174	0	Declined
High needs		75.0	91.7	82.1	-9.6	85.4	87.5	79	56	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	22	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		72.2	91.7	80.8	-10.9	83.8	86.1	90	39	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		89.5	95.4	92.0	-3.4	93.9	94.8	72	143	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		90.0	89.5	93.8	4.3	94.2	95.0	88	174	75	On Target
High needs		79.2	75.0	85.7	10.7	87.9	89.6	88	56	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	22	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		76.7	64.6	80.8	16.2	86.4	88.4	90	39	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		91.0	92.3	94.2	1.9	94.8	95.5	86	143	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		90.0	85.4	86.6	1.2	94.2	95.0	70	54	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		92.2	89.1	88.7	-0.4	95.5	96.1	68	42	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	20.7	26.4	174	25	0.6	1.7	174	0
High needs	9.3	7.1	56	0	1.9	5.4	56	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	22	-	-	-	22	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Students w/ disabilities	8.3	2.6	39	0	0.0	7.7	39	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	21.9	25.9	143	25	0.7	1.4	143	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	37.9	49.4	174	25	7.1	4.0	174	25
High needs	18.5	32.1	56	25	20.4	12.5	56	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	22	-	-	-	22	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Students w/ disabilities	13.9	23.1	39	25	30.6	17.9	39	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	42.3	47.6	143	25	4.4	4.2	143	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	18.3	14.8	54	0	3.3	3.7	54	0
High needs	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	21.7	16.7	42	0	4.3	2.4	42	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		69.5	55.0	-14.5	51.0	No	109	75	On Target
High needs		90.0	43.0	-47.0	51.0	No	37	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		37.0	26.5	-10.5	51.0	Yes	22	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		68.0	54.0	-14.0	51.0	No	90	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		48.0	60.0	12.0	51.0	Yes	109	100	Above Target
High needs		39.0	59.0	20.0	51.0	Yes	37	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		39.0	64.5	25.5	51.0	Yes	22	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		47.0	60.0	13.0	51.0	Yes	90	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	11.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	11.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	11.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	176	175	99	Yes	176	175	99	Yes	54	54	100	Yes
High needs	58	57	98	Yes	58	57	98	Yes	18	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	23	-	-	-	23	-	-	-	10	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	7	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	40	39	98	Yes	40	39	98	Yes	9	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	5	-	-	-	5	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	7	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	14	-	-	-	14	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	7	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	143	143	100	Yes	143	143	100	Yes	42	42	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.