Massachusetts School and District Profiles

James M. Quinn School
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - James M. Quinn School
Organization Information
District:Dartmouth (00720000)School type:Elementary School
School:James M. Quinn School (00720040)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80.4, Target = 91.7 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 80.4, Target = 91.7 75 or Higher All Students 85.8 88.3 80.4 -7.9 91.7 92.9 283600Declined
High needsCPI = 64, Target = 86.6 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 64, Target = 86.6 75 or Higher High needs 77.0 78.1 64.0 -14.1 86.6 88.5 91290Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 72.3, Target = 81.9 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 72.3, Target = 81.9 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 80.2 80.2 72.3 -7.9 81.9 90.1 29660Declined
EL and Former ELCPI = 53.4, Target = 82 - EL and Former EL75 or Higher EL and Former ELEL and Former EL CPI = 53.4, Target = 82 75 or Higher EL and Former EL 80.4 80.4 53.4 -27.0 82.0 90.2 6290Declined
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 49.7, Target = 77.8 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 49.7, Target = 77.8 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 61.9 68.2 49.7 -18.5 77.8 81.0 14750Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.  92.7---- 96.4-27--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 80, Target = 91.5 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 80, Target = 91.5 75 or Higher White 85.4 88.2 80.0 -8.2 91.5 92.7 153140Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.1, Target = 90.7 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 83.1, Target = 90.7 75 or Higher All Students 84.1 85.9 83.1 -2.8 90.7 92.1 393590Declined
High needsCPI = 69.4, Target = 84.8 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 69.4, Target = 84.8 75 or Higher High needs 73.9 76.4 69.4 -7.0 84.8 87.0 241290Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 75.4, Target = 78.6 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 75.4, Target = 78.6 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 76.7 76.7 75.4 -1.3 78.6 88.4 446625No Change
EL and Former ELCPI = 64.7, Target = 79.6 - EL and Former EL75 or Higher EL and Former ELEL and Former EL CPI = 64.7, Target = 79.6 75 or Higher EL and Former EL 77.7 77.7 64.7 -13.0 79.6 88.9 21290Declined
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 57.7, Target = 77.4 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 57.7, Target = 77.4 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 61.2 73.1 57.7 -15.4 77.4 80.6 30750Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.  87.5---- 93.8-27--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 82.7, Target = 90.7 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 82.7, Target = 90.7 75 or Higher White 84.0 86.0 82.7 -3.3 90.7 92.0 233130Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.3, Target = 93.1 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 85.3, Target = 93.1 75 or Higher All Students 88.1 86.8 85.3 -1.5 93.1 94.1 6513325No Change
High needsCPI = 75.5, Target = 88.2 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 75.5, Target = 88.2 75 or Higher High needs 79.7 85.0 75.5 -9.5 88.2 89.9 75480Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------24--
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilities  67.6---- 83.8-29--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.4, Target = 93.5 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 84.4, Target = 93.5 75 or Higher White 88.8 87.5 84.4 -3.1 93.5 94.4 481140Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 12.8 8.13600 2.4 10.63600
High needs 6.2 6.21290 5.4 24.01290
Econ. Disadvantaged 6.9 6.1660 5.6 16.7660
EL and Former EL 7.1 13.82925 3.6 34.5290
Students w/ disabilities 3.0 0.0750 10.6 40.0750
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--27---27-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 13.1 8.33140 2.4 11.83140
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 23.1 27.035925 4.7 10.03590
High needs 12.4 14.012925 10.1 23.31290
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.7 15.26625 11.1 18.2660
EL and Former EL 21.4 17.2290 7.1 34.5290
Students w/ disabilities 6.1 4.0750 12.1 32.0750
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--27---27-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 22.9 25.931325 5.1 10.23130
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 15.1 22.613325 0.9 2.31330
High needs 11.4 12.5480 0.0 6.3480
Econ. Disadvantaged--24---24-
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities--29---29-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 17.0 22.811425 1.1 2.61140
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 38, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 38, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 61.5 38.0 -23.5 51.0No22525Below Target
High needsSGP = 26.5, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 26.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 61.0 26.5 -34.5 51.0No740Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 30.5, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 30.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 58.5 30.5 -28.0 51.0No4225Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-12--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 22, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities SGP = 22, Target = 51 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 66.0 22.0 -44.0 51.0No390Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 37.5, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 37.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 61.0 37.5 -23.5 51.0No19625Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 38.5, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 38.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 52.5 38.5 -14.0 51.0No22425Below Target
High needsSGP = 37.5, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 37.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 52.0 37.5 -14.5 51.0No7425Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 38.5, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 38.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 46.0 38.5 -7.5 51.0No4225Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-12--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 25, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities SGP = 25, Target = 51 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 52.0 25.0 -27.0 51.0No390Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 39, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 39, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 52.0 39.0 -13.0 51.0No19525Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.019.00-
High needs- 60.019.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.019.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students37036799Yes37036599Yes135135100Yes
High needs13313299Yes13313198Yes4848100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged6969100Yes696899Yes24---
EL and Former EL313097Yes312997Yes6---
Students w/ disabilities7676100Yes7676100Yes2929100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian3---3---1---
Afr. Amer./Black6---6---3---
Hispanic/Latino11---11---5---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2929100Yes292897Yes11---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White32131899Yes32131799Yes115115100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles