Massachusetts School and District Profiles

George H Potter
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - George H Potter
Organization Information
District:Dartmouth (00720000)School type:Elementary School
School:George H Potter (00720030)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.6, Target = 92.7CPI = 84.6, Target = 92.7CPI = 84.6, Target = 92.7 87.4 85.5 84.6 -0.9 92.7 93.7 4521025No Change
High needsCPI = 77.2, Target = 87.7CPI = 77.2, Target = 87.7CPI = 77.2, Target = 87.7 78.9 74.4 77.2 2.8 87.7 89.5 578950Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 80.3, Target = 81.6CPI = 80.3, Target = 81.6CPI = 80.3, Target = 81.6 79.9 79.9 80.3 0.4 81.6 90.0 686150Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL -------18--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 59.5, Target = 81.2CPI = 59.5, Target = 81.2CPI = 59.5, Target = 81.2 67.7 52.2 59.5 7.3 81.2 83.9 342950Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.4, Target = 92.8CPI = 84.4, Target = 92.8CPI = 84.4, Target = 92.8 87.6 85.9 84.4 -1.5 92.8 93.8 2918425No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.8, Target = 89.4CPI = 84.8, Target = 89.4CPI = 84.8, Target = 89.4 81.8 86.2 84.8 -1.4 89.4 90.9 4720925No Change
High needsCPI = 76.7, Target = 83.5CPI = 76.7, Target = 83.5CPI = 76.7, Target = 83.5 71.7 75.0 76.7 1.7 83.5 85.9 538950Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 79.1, Target = 77.8CPI = 79.1, Target = 77.8CPI = 79.1, Target = 77.8 75.8 75.8 79.1 3.3 77.8 87.9 6361100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------18--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 62.9, Target = 80.6CPI = 62.9, Target = 80.6CPI = 62.9, Target = 80.6 66.7 62.5 62.9 0.4 80.6 83.4 452950Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.4, Target = 89.8CPI = 85.4, Target = 89.8CPI = 85.4, Target = 89.8 82.5 87.1 85.4 -1.7 89.8 91.3 3618325No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 75.4, Target = 93.8CPI = 75.4, Target = 93.8CPI = 75.4, Target = 93.8 89.4 79.8 75.4 -4.4 93.8 94.7 35650Declined
High needsCPI = 64.6, Target = 89.7CPI = 64.6, Target = 89.7CPI = 64.6, Target = 89.7 82.3 71.9 64.6 -7.3 89.7 91.2 40240Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------14--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 77.2, Target = 93.8CPI = 77.2, Target = 93.8CPI = 77.2, Target = 93.8 89.4 79.1 77.2 -1.9 93.8 94.7 205825No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 13.4 10.02100 6.5 5.221025
High needs 5.6 5.6890 13.3 11.28925
Econ. Disadvantaged 6.1 6.6610 7.6 8.2610
EL and Former EL--18---18-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0290 35.3 27.62925
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 14.1 10.31840 6.8 5.418425
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 27.6 27.32090 6.5 6.22090
High needs 14.4 13.5890 14.4 12.48925
Econ. Disadvantaged 13.6 11.5610 13.6 9.86125
EL and Former EL--18---18-
Students w/ disabilities 5.9 6.92925 29.4 24.12925
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 28.3 26.81830 6.3 6.01830
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 10.2 12.36525 8.2 15.4650
High needs 6.3 0.0240 15.6 29.2240
Econ. Disadvantaged--14---14-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--9---9-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 10.5 13.85825 9.3 12.1580
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 62.5 37.0 -25.5 51.0No13725Below Target
High needsSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 56.0 34.0 -22.0 51.0No5425Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 31.5, Target = 51SGP = 31.5, Target = 51SGP = 31.5, Target = 51 58.0 31.5 -26.5 51.0No3625Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51 70.0 35.0 -35.0 51.0No12325Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 36.5, Target = 51SGP = 36.5, Target = 51SGP = 36.5, Target = 51 65.0 36.5 -28.5 51.0No13625Below Target
High needsSGP = 33.5, Target = 51SGP = 33.5, Target = 51SGP = 33.5, Target = 51 53.5 33.5 -20.0 51.0No5425Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51 55.0 34.5 -20.5 51.0No3625Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 36.5, Target = 51SGP = 36.5, Target = 51SGP = 36.5, Target = 51 65.5 36.5 -29.0 51.0No12225Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.013-
High needs- 60.013-
EL and Former EL- 60.013-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students217216100Yes21721599Yes676597Yes
High needs939299Yes939299Yes252496Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged656498Yes656498Yes15---
EL and Former EL18---18---2---
Students w/ disabilities2929100Yes2929100Yes9---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black4---4---2---
Hispanic/Latino11---11---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.11---11---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White19018999Yes19018899Yes605897Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles