Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Joseph Demello
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Joseph Demello
Organization Information
District:Dartmouth (00720000)School type:Elementary School
School:Joseph Demello (00720015)Grades served:01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.9, Target = 92.9CPI = 92.9, Target = 92.9 87.9 94.4 92.9 -1.5 92.9 94.0 8526075On Target
High needsCPI = 85.8, Target = 87.2CPI = 85.8, Target = 87.2CPI = 85.8, Target = 87.2 78.0 86.9 85.8 -1.1 87.2 89.0 899525No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 89.6, Target = 91.9CPI = 89.6, Target = 91.9CPI = 89.6, Target = 91.9 91.2 91.2 89.6 -1.6 91.9 95.6 965375On Target
EL and Former EL -------24--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 76.3, Target = 78.7CPI = 76.3, Target = 78.7CPI = 76.3, Target = 78.7 63.4 71.9 76.3 4.4 78.7 81.7 813850Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.3, Target = 92.8CPI = 92.3, Target = 92.8 87.6 94.5 92.3 -2.2 92.8 93.8 7423975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91, Target = 92.9CPI = 91, Target = 92.9CPI = 91, Target = 92.9 87.8 91.6 91.0 -0.6 92.9 93.9 7626025No Change
High needsCPI = 82.9, Target = 86.1CPI = 82.9, Target = 86.1CPI = 82.9, Target = 86.1 76.2 84.2 82.9 -1.3 86.1 88.1 799525No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 87.3, Target = 87.3CPI = 87.3, Target = 87.3 86.1 86.1 87.3 1.2 87.3 93.1 915375On Target
EL and Former EL -------24--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 73, Target = 77.1CPI = 73, Target = 77.1CPI = 73, Target = 77.1 60.7 71.9 73.0 1.1 77.1 80.4 723850Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91, Target = 92.8CPI = 91, Target = 92.8CPI = 91, Target = 92.8 87.7 91.9 91.0 -0.9 92.8 93.9 6923925No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.6, Target = 92.9CPI = 86.6, Target = 92.9CPI = 86.6, Target = 92.9 87.8 91.0 86.6 -4.4 92.9 93.9 70800Declined
High needsCPI = 75, Target = 86.4CPI = 75, Target = 86.4CPI = 75, Target = 86.4 76.6 82.7 75.0 -7.7 86.4 88.3 74320Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------19--
EL and Former EL -------10--
Students w/ disabilities -------11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.5, Target = 92.4CPI = 86.5, Target = 92.4CPI = 86.5, Target = 92.4 87.0 91.4 86.5 -4.9 92.4 93.5 57720Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 21.2 23.12600 1.5 2.72600
High needs 10.0 8.4950 4.4 5.3950
Econ. Disadvantaged 14.8 9.4530 1.9 3.8530
EL and Former EL--24---24-
Students w/ disabilities 3.1 5.33825 12.5 13.2380
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--14---14-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 22.0 23.82390 1.7 2.92390
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 40.8 38.82600 1.9 2.32600
High needs 23.3 15.8950 5.6 5.3950
Econ. Disadvantaged 31.5 20.8530 3.7 3.8530
EL and Former EL--24---24-
Students w/ disabilities 6.3 5.3380 15.6 10.53825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--14---14-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 42.6 38.92390 2.1 2.12390
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 27.7 25.0800 1.1 8.8800
High needs 11.5 9.4320 3.8 15.6320
Econ. Disadvantaged--19---19-
EL and Former EL--10---10-
Students w/ disabilities--11---11-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 26.4 26.4720 1.1 8.3720
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 64.0 49.0 -15.0 51.0No16450Below Target
High needsSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 63.5 40.0 -23.5 51.0No6125Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 38.5, Target = 51SGP = 38.5, Target = 51SGP = 38.5, Target = 51 71.0 38.5 -32.5 51.0No3625Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-17--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 64.0 49.0 -15.0 51.0No14950Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 54.0 44.0 -10.0 51.0No16550Below Target
High needsSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 51.0 44.0 -7.0 51.0No6150Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 55.0 42.0 -13.0 51.0Yes3675On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-17--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 53.5 45.0 -8.5 51.0No15050Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 46.0 60.0220
High needs 46.0 60.0220
EL and Former EL- 60.022-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students268267100Yes269268100Yes8282100Yes
High needs9898100Yes9999100Yes3232100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged5454100Yes5555100Yes19---
EL and Former EL24---24---10---
Students w/ disabilities4040100Yes4040100Yes11---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---1-------
Afr. Amer./Black3---3---2---
Hispanic/Latino3---4---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.14---14---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White247246100Yes247246100Yes7474100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles