Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Highlands
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Highlands
Organization Information
District:Danvers (00710000)School type:Elementary School
School:Highlands (00710010)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.5, Target = 92.2CPI = 87.5, Target = 92.2CPI = 87.5, Target = 92.2 86.6 89.5 87.5 -2.0 92.2 93.3 5920425No Change
High needsCPI = 82.4, Target = 86.8CPI = 82.4, Target = 86.8CPI = 82.4, Target = 86.8 77.3 81.9 82.4 0.5 86.8 88.7 807150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 89.7, Target = 86.3CPI = 89.7, Target = 86.3CPI = 89.7, Target = 86.3 85.1 85.1 89.7 4.6 86.3 92.6 9646100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 74, Target = 83.1CPI = 74, Target = 83.1CPI = 74, Target = 83.1 71.1 76.9 74.0 -2.9 83.1 85.6 75260Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.4, Target = 92.9CPI = 87.4, Target = 92.9CPI = 87.4, Target = 92.9 87.9 89.4 87.4 -2.0 92.9 94.0 4717025No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85, Target = 91.9CPI = 85, Target = 91.9CPI = 85, Target = 91.9 86.1 83.1 85.0 1.9 91.9 93.1 4820450Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 78.5, Target = 86.3CPI = 78.5, Target = 86.3CPI = 78.5, Target = 86.3 76.5 75.4 78.5 3.1 86.3 88.3 617150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 80.4, Target = 80.6CPI = 80.4, Target = 80.6 78.8 78.8 80.4 1.6 80.6 89.4 684675On Target
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 70.2, Target = 82.2CPI = 70.2, Target = 82.2CPI = 70.2, Target = 82.2 69.5 66.3 70.2 3.9 82.2 84.8 652650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.1, Target = 92.4CPI = 85.1, Target = 92.4CPI = 85.1, Target = 92.4 86.9 83.1 85.1 2.0 92.4 93.5 3417050Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 66.4, Target = 89.1CPI = 66.4, Target = 89.1CPI = 66.4, Target = 89.1 81.3 71.5 66.4 -5.1 89.1 90.7 19760Declined
High needs  76.1---- 88.1-27--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 66.5, Target = 89.4CPI = 66.5, Target = 89.4CPI = 66.5, Target = 89.4 81.8 70.9 66.5 -4.4 89.4 90.9 6650Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 12.2 11.32040 3.3 4.92040
High needs 5.2 2.8710 6.9 5.67125
Econ. Disadvantaged 8.1 2.2460 2.7 2.24625
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities 3.8 3.8260 11.5 7.72625
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 12.2 11.81700 3.2 5.31700
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 20.9 21.62040 7.7 6.920425
High needs 13.6 15.57125 15.3 11.37125
Econ. Disadvantaged 15.4 15.2460 10.3 6.54625
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities 7.7 7.7260 23.1 23.1260
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 20.4 21.21700 7.0 6.51700
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 2.0 3.97625 14.0 17.1760
High needs--27---27-
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 2.3 4.66525 14.0 16.9650
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 52.0 42.0 -10.0 51.0No12750Below Target
High needsSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 48.0 56.0 8.0 51.0No3775On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-22--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 40.5, Target = 51SGP = 40.5, Target = 51SGP = 40.5, Target = 51 52.0 40.5 -11.5 51.0No10650Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51 51.0 34.5 -16.5 51.0Yes12875On Target
High needsSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 48.0 43.0 -5.0 51.0No3850Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-23--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 51.0 37.0 -14.0 51.0Yes10775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.06-
High needs- 60.06-
EL and Former EL- 60.06-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students208208100Yes208208100Yes7979100Yes
High needs7474100Yes7474100Yes2929100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged4747100Yes4747100Yes19---
EL and Former EL10---10---4---
Students w/ disabilities2727100Yes2727100Yes12---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian6---6---1---
Afr. Amer./Black5---5---1---
Hispanic/Latino15---15---7---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.9---9---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White171171100Yes171171100Yes6666100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles