Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Clinton Middle School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Clinton Middle School

Organization Information

District:

Clinton (00640000)

School type:

Elementary-Middle School

School:

Clinton Middle School (00640305)

Grades served:

04,05,06,07,08

Region:

Central

Title I status:

Title I School (TA)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		84.0	78.9	82.4	3.5	90.7	92.0	50	648	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		75.4	70.1	72.4	2.3	85.7	87.7	37	322	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		73.3	73.3	76.1	2.8	75.5	86.7	47	237	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		67.8	61.3	53.9	-7.4	81.2	83.9	12	71	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		59.2	55.9	58.5	2.6	76.2	79.6	40	121	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		85.8	-	-	-	-	92.9	-	31	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		72.0	73.6	71.7	-1.9	83.7	86.0	29	138	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		87.2	80.2	85.2	5.0	92.5	93.6	31	461	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		71.7	66.5	69.6	3.1	83.5	85.9	31	648	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		59.6	54.2	57.4	3.2	76.4	79.8	16	322	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		56.6	56.6	59.8	3.2	60.2	78.3	21	237	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		53.4	42.5	48.6	6.1	72.8	76.7	10	71	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		41.1	40.5	39.3	-1.2	65.6	70.6	14	121	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		66.7	-	-	-	-	83.4	-	31	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		60.2	55.6	60.7	5.1	76.8	80.1	21	138	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		75.1	69.5	73.4	3.9	85.5	87.6	18	461	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		65.2	72.7	69.1	-3.6	79.7	82.6	59	248	0	Declined
High needs		52.8	62.8	60.5	-2.3	72.5	76.4	56	119	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		66.1	66.1	62.4	-3.7	68.9	83.1	70	93	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		40.9	53.3	46.3	-7.0	65.5	70.5	47	40	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		51.3	60.3	58.2	-2.1	71.6	75.7	62	52	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		69.7	76.4	72.9	-3.5	82.3	84.9	37	180	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	3.8	4.3	648	25	10.2	10.0	648	0
High needs	1.9	0.6	322	0	17.5	18.0	322	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	2.1	0.8	237	0	14.5	16.0	237	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	0.0	71	0	25.4	39.4	71	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.8	0.0	121	0	32.8	31.4	121	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	31	-	-	-	31	-
Hispanic/Latino	3.1	1.4	138	0	15.0	22.5	138	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	4.1	5.4	461	25	9.1	6.9	461	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	7.4	11.4	648	25	22.0	21.9	648	0
High needs	3.2	5.3	322	25	35.8	32.9	322	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	4.1	6.8	237	25	33.7	30.8	237	0
EL and Former EL	1.4	1.4	71	0	54.8	40.8	71	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.8	121	25	51.2	57.0	121	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	31	-	-	-	31	-
Hispanic/Latino	4.7	7.2	138	25	36.4	28.3	138	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	7.6	12.8	461	25	17.1	18.4	461	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	7.7	3.2	248	0	15.9	15.3	248	0
High needs	1.7	0.8	119	0	25.6	24.4	119	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	2.1	1.1	93	0	23.2	20.4	93	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	40	0	34.0	45.0	40	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Hispanic/Latino	2.0	1.9	52	0	29.4	32.7	52	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	9.5	3.9	180	0	12.3	10.0	180	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		34.0	45.0	11.0	51.0	Yes	630	75	On Target
High needs		31.0	37.5	6.5	51.0	No	312	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		32.0	39.0	7.0	51.0	Yes	231	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		40.0	42.5	2.5	51.0	No	62	50	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		25.0	35.0	10.0	51.0	No	120	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	26	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		38.0	44.0	6.0	51.0	No	133	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		33.0	44.5	11.5	51.0	Yes	454	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		43.0	47.0	4.0	51.0	Yes	631	75	On Target
High needs		39.0	43.0	4.0	51.0	No	312	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		39.0	44.0	5.0	51.0	No	231	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		46.5	40.0	-6.5	51.0	No	63	25	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		43.0	35.0	-8.0	51.0	No	120	25	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	26	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		42.0	44.0	2.0	51.0	No	134	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		43.0	48.0	5.0	51.0	Yes	454	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	73.5	60.0	34.00	25
High needs	73.5	60.0	34.00	25
EL and Former EL	73.5	60.0	34.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	673	672	100	Yes	674	673	100	Yes	262	261	100	Yes
High needs	345	344	100	Yes	345	344	100	Yes	132	131	99	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	253	253	100	Yes	253	253	100	Yes	101	101	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	83	83	100	Yes	83	83	100	Yes	25	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	128	127	99	Yes	128	127	99	Yes	43	42	98	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Asian	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	33	33	100	Yes	33	33	100	Yes	12	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	151	151	100	Yes	151	151	100	Yes	58	58	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	9	-	-	-	9	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	471	470	100	Yes	471	470	100	Yes	186	185	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.