Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Fairview Elementary

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Fairview Elementary

Organization Information

District:

Chicopee (00610000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Fairview Elementary (00610050)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Berkshires +

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		79.1	83.0	82.0	-1.0	87.8	89.6	33	194	25	No Change
High needs		76.8	81.6	80.1	-1.5	86.5	88.4	70	143	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		81.9	81.9	80.6	-1.3	83.4	91.0	70	129	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		45.2	62.5	62.9	0.4	68.0	72.6	46	33	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		73.7	79.1	78.9	-0.2	84.7	86.9	77	83	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		81.5	85.8	83.2	-2.6	89.2	90.8	23	95	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		79.4	79.5	84.2	4.7	88.0	89.7	45	195	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		77.5	76.9	82.5	5.6	86.9	88.8	78	144	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		76.9	76.9	82.1	5.2	78.8	88.5	75	130	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		52.9	60.6	72.7	12.1	72.5	76.5	72	33	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		72.9	72.2	80.7	8.5	84.2	86.5	77	83	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		82.6	85.5	86.2	0.7	89.9	91.3	40	96	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		67.1	62.9	78.6	15.7	80.8	83.6	42	63	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		63.5	62.8	74.5	11.7	78.7	81.8	73	49	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		63.5	63.5	73.9	10.4	66.5	81.8	74	45	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		57.5	-	71.7	6.9	75.2	78.8	75	30	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		70.6	63.0	84.6	21.6	82.9	85.3	49	26	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	6.0	5.7	194	0	3.3	4.6	194	0
High needs	3.8	6.3	143	25	3.8	4.2	143	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	3.4	7.0	129	25	2.5	3.1	129	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	33	0	11.5	12.1	33	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Hispanic/Latino	5.1	3.6	83	0	3.8	7.2	83	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	6.0	7.4	95	25	2.4	3.2	95	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	15.9	29.2	195	25	9.9	9.2	195	0
High needs	15.0	31.9	144	25	12.8	10.4	144	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	14.3	32.3	130	25	12.6	11.5	130	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Students w/ disabilities	3.8	15.2	33	25	30.8	15.2	33	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Hispanic/Latino	6.3	26.5	83	25	19.0	12.0	83	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	24.1	32.3	96	25	2.4	8.3	96	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	0.0	15.9	63	25	17.9	11.1	63	25
High needs	0.0	12.2	49	25	16.3	14.3	49	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	11.1	45	25	16.2	15.6	45	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	20.0	30	25	15.6	20.0	30	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	0.0	15.4	26	25	28.0	3.8	26	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		60.0	38.0	-22.0	51.0	No	123	25	Below Target
High needs		62.0	39.0	-23.0	51.0	No	87	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		62.0	37.0	-25.0	51.0	No	76	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		62.0	44.0	-18.0	51.0	No	59	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		60.0	37.0	-23.0	51.0	No	53	25	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		48.5	51.0	2.5	51.0	Yes	124	75	On Target
High needs		45.0	52.0	7.0	51.0	Yes	88	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		44.5	51.0	6.5	51.0	Yes	77	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		47.0	60.0	13.0	51.0	Yes	59	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		51.0	38.5	-12.5	51.0	Yes	54	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	17.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	17.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	17.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	205	204	100	Yes	205	205	100	Yes	70	70	100	Yes
High needs	151	150	99	Yes	151	151	100	Yes	55	55	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	137	136	99	Yes	137	137	100	Yes	51	51	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	20	-	-	-	20	-	-	-	10	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	33	33	100	Yes	33	33	100	Yes	10	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	5	-	-	-	5	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	88	88	100	Yes	88	88	100	Yes	33	33	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	100	99	99	Yes	100	100	100	Yes	29	29	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.