Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Lambert-Lavoie
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Lambert-Lavoie
Organization Information
District:Chicopee (00610000)School type:Elementary School
School:Lambert-Lavoie (00610040)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Berkshires +Title I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.2, Target = 89.6CPI = 85.2, Target = 89.6CPI = 85.2, Target = 89.6 82.2 86.9 85.2 -1.7 89.6 91.1 4813325No Change
High needsCPI = 78.5, Target = 87.2CPI = 78.5, Target = 87.2CPI = 78.5, Target = 87.2 78.1 82.3 78.5 -3.8 87.2 89.1 63780Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 79.6, Target = 84.4CPI = 79.6, Target = 84.4CPI = 79.6, Target = 84.4 83.0 83.0 79.6 -3.4 84.4 91.5 64700Declined
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 81.3, Target = 83.7CPI = 81.3, Target = 83.7CPI = 81.3, Target = 83.7 72.0 83.3 81.3 -2.0 83.7 86.0 843625No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.3, Target = 90.7CPI = 87.3, Target = 90.7CPI = 87.3, Target = 90.7 84.1 86.7 87.3 0.6 90.7 92.1 468150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.7, Target = 85.2CPI = 86.7, Target = 85.2CPI = 86.7, Target = 85.2 74.6 88.0 86.7 -1.3 85.2 87.3 54133100Above Target
High needsCPI = 81.7, Target = 82.7CPI = 81.7, Target = 82.7 70.3 82.0 81.7 -0.3 82.7 85.2 747875On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 82.5, Target = 83.7CPI = 82.5, Target = 83.7CPI = 82.5, Target = 83.7 82.2 82.2 82.5 0.3 83.7 91.1 767075On Target
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 77.8, Target = 76.4CPI = 77.8, Target = 76.4CPI = 77.8, Target = 76.4 59.5 79.2 77.8 -1.4 76.4 79.8 6936100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.2, Target = 86.8CPI = 89.2, Target = 86.8CPI = 89.2, Target = 86.8 77.4 89.6 89.2 -0.4 86.8 88.7 5781100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.1, Target = 78.2CPI = 82.1, Target = 78.2CPI = 82.1, Target = 78.2 62.7 83.3 82.1 -1.2 78.2 81.4 5439100Above Target
High needsCPI = 73.9, Target = 76.7CPI = 73.9, Target = 76.7CPI = 73.9, Target = 76.7 60.0 82.4 73.9 -8.5 76.7 80.0 72230Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.1, Target = 80.2CPI = 84.1, Target = 80.2CPI = 84.1, Target = 80.2 66.0 82.5 84.1 1.6 80.2 83.0 4622100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 14.1 10.51330 6.7 6.013325
High needs 4.0 5.17825 9.3 9.0780
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.3 4.3700 10.1 8.67025
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--22---22-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino 3.3 2.8360 13.3 8.33625
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 14.9 16.0810 5.3 3.78125
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 39.3 34.61330 5.9 6.81330
High needs 29.3 21.8780 10.7 9.07825
Econ. Disadvantaged 30.4 21.4700 10.1 7.17025
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--22---22-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino 30.0 16.7360 16.7 13.93625
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 38.3 40.7810 3.2 3.7810
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 16.7 23.13925 3.7 7.7390
High needs 18.5 8.7230 3.7 13.0230
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--9---9-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 12.5 31.82225 2.5 9.1220
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 52.0 43.0 -9.0 51.0No8350Below Target
High needsSGP = 32.5, Target = 51SGP = 32.5, Target = 51SGP = 32.5, Target = 51 41.0 32.5 -8.5 51.0No5025Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51 41.0 31.0 -10.0 51.0No4625Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-21--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 53.0 46.0 -7.0 51.0No5450Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 56.0 49.0 -7.0 51.0No8350Below Target
High needsSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 49.0 41.0 -8.0 51.0No5050Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 48.0 43.0 -5.0 51.0No4650Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-21--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 51.5 52.0 0.5 51.0No5475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students14614398Yes14614398Yes4141100Yes
High needs908898Yes908898Yes2525100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged817998Yes817998Yes22---
EL and Former EL1---1-------
Students w/ disabilities29---29---10---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian6---6---2---
Afr. Amer./Black5---5---1---
Hispanic/Latino414098Yes414098Yes13---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.6---6---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White888698Yes888698Yes2424100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles