Massachusetts School and District Profiles

George F. Kelly Elementary
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - George F. Kelly Elementary
Organization Information
District:Chelsea (00570000)School type:Elementary School
School:George F. Kelly Elementary (00570035)Grades served:01,02,03,04
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 66.6, Target = 85 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 66.6, Target = 85 75 or Higher All Students 74.3 69.0 66.6 -2.4 85.0 87.2 626325No Change
High needsCPI = 61.9, Target = 84.4 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 61.9, Target = 84.4 75 or Higher High needs 73.2 66.2 61.9 -4.3 84.4 86.6 71770Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 64.5, Target = 71.9 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 64.5, Target = 71.9 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 69.3 69.3 64.5 -4.8 71.9 84.7 101530Declined
EL and Former ELCPI = 55.6, Target = 80.5 - EL and Former EL75 or Higher EL and Former ELEL and Former EL CPI = 55.6, Target = 80.5 75 or Higher EL and Former EL 66.5 61.4 55.6 -5.8 80.5 83.3 8540Declined
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 30.7, Target = 72.9 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 30.7, Target = 72.9 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 53.6 42.0 30.7 -11.3 72.9 76.8 1350Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 65.8, Target = 85.1 - Hispanic/Latino75 or Higher Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino CPI = 65.8, Target = 85.1 75 or Higher Hispanic/Latino 74.5 67.2 65.8 -1.4 85.1 87.3 2324325No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------12--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 74.4, Target = 89.4 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 74.4, Target = 89.4 75 or Higher All Students 81.8 79.3 74.4 -4.9 89.4 90.9 142630Declined
High needsCPI = 69.1, Target = 89 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 69.1, Target = 89 75 or Higher High needs 81.1 75.1 69.1 -6.0 89.0 90.6 231770Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 70.3, Target = 79.1 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 70.3, Target = 79.1 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 77.2 77.2 70.3 -6.9 79.1 88.6 261530Declined
EL and Former ELCPI = 68.5, Target = 85 - EL and Former EL75 or Higher EL and Former ELEL and Former EL CPI = 68.5, Target = 85 75 or Higher EL and Former EL 74.3 73.6 68.5 -5.1 85.0 87.2 33540Declined
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 37.1, Target = 82.5 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 37.1, Target = 82.5 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 70.0 51.1 37.1 -14.0 82.5 85.0 2350Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 74.5, Target = 89.4 - Hispanic/Latino75 or Higher Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino CPI = 74.5, Target = 89.4 75 or Higher Hispanic/Latino 81.9 78.2 74.5 -3.7 89.4 91.0 522430Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------12--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 2.1 3.426325 16.4 20.92630
High needs 2.1 1.71770 19.9 27.11770
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.5 2.01530 16.4 24.21530
EL and Former EL 0.0 0.0540 23.6 29.6540
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0350 52.3 68.6350
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino 2.4 2.924325 18.1 22.62430
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--12---12-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 18.2 17.12630 11.4 16.02630
High needs 15.7 12.41770 16.2 20.31770
Econ. Disadvantaged 16.4 12.41530 14.5 20.31530
EL and Former EL 10.9 9.3540 18.2 16.7540
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0350 47.7 57.1350
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino 17.4 16.02430 12.3 15.22430
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--12---12-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All students --- 51.0-133--
High needs --- 51.0-86--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-73--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-25--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-125--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-5--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All students --- 51.0-133--
High needs --- 51.0-86--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-73--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-25--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-125--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-5--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 82.0 60.0118.0025
High needs 82.0 60.0118.0025
EL and Former EL 82.0 60.0118.0025
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students263263100Yes263263100Yes----
High needs177177100Yes177177100Yes----
Econ. Disadvantaged153153100Yes153153100Yes----
EL and Former EL5454100Yes5454100Yes----
Students w/ disabilities3535100Yes3535100Yes----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian3---3-------
Afr. Amer./Black4---4-------
Hispanic/Latino243243100Yes243243100Yes----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.1---1-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White12---12-------

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles