Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Charles D Harrington
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Charles D Harrington
Organization Information
District:Chelmsford (00560000)School type:Elementary School
School:Charles D Harrington (00560025)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.2, Target = 94.7CPI = 87.2, Target = 94.7CPI = 87.2, Target = 94.7 90.9 85.9 87.2 1.3 94.7 95.5 5817650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 77, Target = 89.6CPI = 77, Target = 89.6CPI = 77, Target = 89.6 82.2 74.0 77.0 3.0 89.6 91.1 566350Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 74.1, Target = 76.4CPI = 74.1, Target = 76.4CPI = 74.1, Target = 76.4 74.2 74.2 74.1 -0.1 76.4 87.1 362825No Change
EL and Former EL -------21--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 77.4, Target = 90.7CPI = 77.4, Target = 90.7CPI = 77.4, Target = 90.7 84.0 69.4 77.4 8.0 90.7 92.0 833150Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 89, Target = 95.2CPI = 89, Target = 95.2CPI = 89, Target = 95.2 91.7 90.9 89.0 -1.9 95.2 95.9 342525No Change
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.1, Target = 94.8CPI = 89.1, Target = 94.8CPI = 89.1, Target = 94.8 91.1 85.5 89.1 3.6 94.8 95.6 5612250Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.8, Target = 94.6CPI = 89.8, Target = 94.6CPI = 89.8, Target = 94.6 90.7 89.2 89.8 0.6 94.6 95.4 6917650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 83.3, Target = 88.7CPI = 83.3, Target = 88.7CPI = 83.3, Target = 88.7 80.6 79.2 83.3 4.1 88.7 90.3 816350Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 83, Target = 80CPI = 83, Target = 80CPI = 83, Target = 80 78.2 78.2 83.0 4.8 80.0 89.1 7828100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------21--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 85.5, Target = 86.6CPI = 85.5, Target = 86.6CPI = 85.5, Target = 86.6 77.1 75.6 85.5 9.9 86.6 88.6 963175On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 92, Target = 97.5CPI = 92, Target = 97.5CPI = 92, Target = 97.5 95.7 96.9 92.0 -4.9 97.5 97.9 29250Declined
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.8, Target = 94.6CPI = 91.8, Target = 94.6CPI = 91.8, Target = 94.6 90.7 87.9 91.8 3.9 94.6 95.4 7412250Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 13.6 9.11760 3.0 0.617625
High needs 4.1 1.6630 8.1 0.06325
Econ. Disadvantaged 6.3 0.0280 6.3 0.02825
EL and Former EL--21---21-
Students w/ disabilities 2.5 3.23125 12.5 0.03125
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 21.2 20.0250 0.0 0.02525
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 12.6 8.21220 4.2 0.812225
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 33.2 29.01760 3.6 2.317625
High needs 13.9 11.1630 8.3 3.26325
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.7 10.72825 6.5 3.62825
EL and Former EL--21---21-
Students w/ disabilities 7.7 16.13125 12.8 0.03125
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 59.4 40.0250 0.0 4.0250
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 30.8 31.11220 4.2 0.812225
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 50.0 61.0 11.0 51.0No94100Above Target
High needsSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 53.0 39.0 -14.0 51.0No3325Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-13--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-14--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-16--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 41.0 62.0 21.0 51.0Yes63100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 57.0 62.0 5.0 51.0No93100Above Target
High needsSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 48.5 37.0 -11.5 51.0No3225Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-13--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-13--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-15--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 57.0 62.0 5.0 51.0Yes63100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 79.5 60.02025
High needs 79.5 60.02025
EL and Former EL- 60.020-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students176176100Yes176176100Yes----
High needs6363100Yes6363100Yes----
Econ. Disadvantaged2828100Yes2828100Yes----
EL and Former EL21---21-------
Students w/ disabilities3131100Yes3131100Yes----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian2525100Yes2525100Yes----
Afr. Amer./Black8---8-------
Hispanic/Latino14---14-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White122122100Yes122122100Yes----

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles