Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Putnam Avenue Upper School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Putnam Avenue Upper School

Organization Information

District:

Cambridge (00490000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Putnam Avenue Upper School (00490310)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		82.9	84.3	81.4	-2.9	88.6	91.5	18	240	0	Declined
High needs		77.9	79.3	75.4	-3.9	85.3	89.0	27	140	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		81.3	81.3	78.7	-2.6	82.9	90.7	26	114	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		61.3	72.0	62.3	-9.7	74.2	80.7	29	57	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		80.7	82.6	76.9	-5.7	87.1	90.4	31	91	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino		75.0	77.6	69.2	-8.4	83.3	87.5	13	39	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White		86.7	87.7	90.4	2.7	91.1	93.4	38	68	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		72.1	70.6	67.8	-2.8	81.4	86.1	17	236	0	Declined
High needs		65.6	63.5	56.9	-6.6	77.1	82.8	19	138	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		63.0	63.0	58.9	-4.1	66.1	81.5	16	112	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		48.8	53.9	46.9	-7.0	65.9	74.4	41	56	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	22	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		68.0	66.7	56.9	-9.8	78.7	84.0	34	90	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino		57.7	57.8	54.5	-3.3	71.8	78.9	15	39	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White		78.6	75.0	78.4	3.4	85.7	89.3	35	67	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		69.5	77.4	66.9	-10.5	79.7	84.8	26	80	0	Declined
High needs		61.0	75.7	51.6	-24.1	74.0	80.5	15	46	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		75.9	75.9	48.8	-27.1	77.9	88.0	13	42	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		65.8	69.0	50.8	-18.2	77.2	82.9	43	31	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		74.1	-	-	-	-	87.1	-	26	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	10.4	11.3	240	0	8.5	12.9	240	0
High needs	6.0	2.1	140	0	12.0	17.9	140	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	6.5	1.8	114	0	10.2	14.0	114	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.7	0.0	57	0	16.9	33.3	57	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Asian	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Afr. Amer./Black	4.5	2.2	91	0	7.9	18.7	91	0
Hispanic/Latino	3.4	0.0	39	0	17.2	20.5	39	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
White	19.3	27.9	68	25	7.0	5.9	68	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	18.7	16.5	236	0	24.8	28.8	236	0
High needs	15.0	5.1	138	0	34.6	40.6	138	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	16.7	5.4	112	0	34.3	37.5	112	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.7	0.0	56	0	51.7	55.4	56	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Asian	-	-	22	-	-	-	22	-
Afr. Amer./Black	8.9	5.6	90	0	30.0	40.0	90	0
Hispanic/Latino	6.9	2.6	39	0	34.5	41.0	39	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
White	31.0	32.8	67	0	22.4	19.4	67	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	3.2	3.8	80	25	6.3	26.3	80	0
High needs	2.6	0.0	46	0	10.5	43.5	46	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	3.4	0.0	42	0	6.9	47.6	42	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Afr. Amer./Black	0.0	0.0	31	0	16.0	41.9	31	0
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	26	-	-	-	26	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		46.0	36.0	-10.0	51.0	No	217	25	Below Target
High needs		46.0	31.5	-14.5	51.0	No	130	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		46.0	37.0	-9.0	51.0	No	106	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		48.5	33.0	-15.5	51.0	No	49	25	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	23	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		46.0	21.0	-25.0	51.0	No	83	0	Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		46.0	19.0	-27.0	51.0	No	37	0	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
White		44.0	51.0	7.0	51.0	Yes	58	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		50.0	30.0	-20.0	51.0	No	213	0	Below Target
High needs		53.0	27.0	-26.0	51.0	No	127	0	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		52.0	29.0	-23.0	51.0	No	104	0	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		47.0	25.0	-22.0	51.0	No	46	0	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		42.5	20.0	-22.5	51.0	No	83	0	Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		41.5	25.0	-16.5	51.0	No	37	0	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
White		53.0	33.0	-20.0	51.0	Yes	57	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	2.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	2.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	2.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	253	252	100	Yes	254	248	98	Yes	84	84	100	Yes
High needs	149	148	99	Yes	150	146	97	Yes	48	48	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	119	118	99	Yes	119	115	97	Yes	43	43	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	15	-	-	-	16	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	57	57	100	Yes	57	56	98	Yes	19	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Asian	27	-	-	-	27	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	94	93	99	Yes	94	92	98	Yes	32	32	100	Yes
Hispanic/Latino	39	39	100	Yes	39	39	100	Yes	11	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	16	-	-	-	16	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	72	72	100	Yes	73	72	99	Yes	28	28	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.