Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Cambridge Street Upper School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Cambridge Street Upper School

Organization Information

District:

Cambridge (00490000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Cambridge Street Upper School (00490305)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		87.4	88.0	88.9	0.9	91.6	93.7	43	237	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		81.0	81.1	83.3	2.2	87.3	90.5	69	126	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		82.1	82.1	82.9	0.8	83.6	91.1	45	95	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		67.6	73.1	76.5	3.4	78.4	83.8	73	66	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		81.3	78.2	80.8	2.6	87.5	90.7	46	82	50	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		87.5	84.7	86.0	1.3	91.7	93.8	68	43	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
White		90.3	94.4	95.1	0.7	93.5	95.2	74	77	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		70.5	73.1	68.6	-4.5	80.3	85.3	19	237	0	Declined
High needs		59.4	62.7	59.0	-3.7	72.9	79.7	27	125	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		61.3	61.3	58.9	-2.4	64.5	80.7	16	95	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		45.8	57.8	53.0	-4.8	63.9	72.9	60	66	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		59.6	57.8	56.1	-1.7	73.1	79.8	30	82	25	No Change
Hispanic/Latino		63.6	59.7	64.9	5.2	75.7	81.8	48	42	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
White		80.8	85.7	81.3	-4.4	87.2	90.4	48	76	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		54.2	71.5	55.1	-16.4	69.5	77.1	12	83	0	Declined
High needs		46.6	60.4	52.0	-8.4	64.4	73.3	16	50	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		56.8	-	-	-	-	78.4	-	41	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		45.7	57.4	51.0	-6.4	63.8	72.9	47	26	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		47.3	-	46.0	-4.8	64.9	73.7	28	31	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White		62.9	84.5	70.5	-14.0	75.3	81.5	18	28	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	23.0	19.0	237	0	5.3	4.6	237	25
High needs	8.3	7.1	126	0	9.8	8.7	126	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	7.7	6.3	95	0	9.9	8.4	95	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Students w/ disabilities	6.0	4.5	66	0	14.9	13.6	66	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Asian	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Afr. Amer./Black	7.8	7.3	82	0	11.7	7.3	82	25
Hispanic/Latino	2.8	0.0	43	0	5.6	7.0	43	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
White	41.8	42.9	77	0	2.0	2.6	77	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	29.5	21.9	237	0	21.7	24.1	237	0
High needs	9.8	8.8	125	0	32.6	32.8	125	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	9.9	7.4	95	0	34.1	32.6	95	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Students w/ disabilities	3.0	7.6	66	25	40.3	43.9	66	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Asian	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Afr. Amer./Black	7.8	2.4	82	0	36.4	35.4	82	0
Hispanic/Latino	5.6	4.8	42	0	27.8	28.6	42	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
White	52.0	50.0	76	0	12.2	14.5	76	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	5.1	4.8	83	0	20.5	28.9	83	0
High needs	0.0	0.0	50	0	31.7	30.0	50	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	41	-	-	-	41	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	26	0	33.3	34.6	26	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	0.0	0.0	31	0	41.9	35.5	31	25
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
White	13.8	14.3	28	0	6.9	14.3	28	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		57.0	56.0	-1.0	51.0	Yes	219	75	On Target
High needs		51.5	56.0	4.5	51.0	Yes	111	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		51.5	52.0	0.5	51.0	Yes	87	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		50.5	57.0	6.5	51.0	Yes	58	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		56.0	45.0	-11.0	51.0	Yes	75	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		47.0	58.0	11.0	51.0	Yes	41	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
White		61.0	71.0	10.0	51.0	Yes	75	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		49.5	49.5	0.0	51.0	No	222	50	Below Target
High needs		38.0	41.0	3.0	51.0	No	113	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		32.5	36.0	3.5	51.0	No	87	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		41.5	42.0	0.5	51.0	No	60	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		41.0	35.5	-5.5	51.0	No	76	25	Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		28.0	44.5	16.5	51.0	No	40	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
White		64.0	61.0	-3.0	51.0	No	75	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	3.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	3.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	3.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	249	243	98	Yes	251	245	98	Yes	86	86	100	Yes
High needs	134	132	99	Yes	136	133	98	Yes	53	53	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	99	97	98	Yes	101	99	98	Yes	42	42	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	11	-	-	-	12	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	69	68	99	Yes	69	68	99	Yes	27	27	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	4	-	-	-	5	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Asian	19	-	-	-	20	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	86	85	99	Yes	86	85	99	Yes	32	32	100	Yes
Hispanic/Latino	44	44	100	Yes	44	43	98	Yes	14	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	13	-	-	-	13	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
White	80	78	98	Yes	80	77	96	Yes	28	28	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.