Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Fletcher/Maynard Academy

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Fletcher/Maynard Academy

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.7, Target = 83.8 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 86.7, Target = 83.8CPI = 86.7, Target = 83.875 or Higher All Students 75.7 88.8 86.7 -2.1 83.8 87.9 5579100Above Target
High needsCPI = 83.7, Target = 83.1 - High needsHigh needs-CPI = 83.7, Target = 83.175 or Higher High needs 74.6 89.1 83.7 -5.4 83.1 87.3 835275On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 83.3, Target = 89.9 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 83.3, Target = 89.9 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 89.0 89.0 83.3 -5.7 89.9 94.5 81420Declined
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 77.6, Target = 79.2 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 77.6, Target = 79.2 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 68.8 83.9 77.6 -6.3 79.2 84.4 84290Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 87.1, Target = 78.9 - Afr. Amer./BlackAfr. Amer./Black-CPI = 87.1, Target = 78.9CPI = 87.1, Target = 78.975 or Higher Afr. Amer./Black 68.4 90.0 87.1 -2.9 78.9 84.2 9135100Above Target
Hispanic/Latino -------18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------17--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80.7, Target = 86.6 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 80.7, Target = 86.6 75 or Higher All Students 79.9 83.8 80.7 -3.1 86.6 90.0 29790Declined
High needsCPI = 78.4, Target = 85.6 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 78.4, Target = 85.6 75 or Higher High needs 78.4 82.8 78.4 -4.4 85.6 89.2 60520Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 75.6, Target = 84.4 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 75.6, Target = 84.4 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 83.0 83.0 75.6 -7.4 84.4 91.5 45420Declined
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 75, Target = 85.7 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 75, Target = 85.7 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 78.6 81.5 75.0 -6.5 85.7 89.3 77290Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 83.6, Target = 82.9 - Afr. Amer./BlackAfr. Amer./Black-CPI = 83.6, Target = 82.975 or Higher Afr. Amer./Black 74.3 86.4 83.6 -2.8 82.9 87.2 883575On Target
Hispanic/Latino -------18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------17--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 72.1, Target = 77.8 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 72.1, Target = 77.8 75 or Higher All Students 66.7 68.8 72.1 3.3 77.8 83.4 262650Improved Below Target
High needs -------16--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------7--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 5.0 11.47925 1.3 6.3790
High needs 4.7 5.85225 1.6 5.8520
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.0 4.84225 2.0 4.8420
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities 3.2 3.4290 3.2 6.9290
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black 5.7 14.33525 0.0 5.7350
Hispanic/Latino--18---18-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--17---17-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 20.0 27.87925 3.8 8.9790
High needs 17.2 17.3520 3.1 9.6520
Econ. Disadvantaged 16.0 16.7420 4.0 11.9420
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities 12.9 6.9290 6.5 17.2290
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black 28.6 37.13525 2.9 8.6350
Hispanic/Latino--18---18-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--17---17-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 10.7 7.7260 10.7 15.4260
High needs--16---16-
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--9---9-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--7---7-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 43.5, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 43.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 66.5 43.5 -23.0 51.0No3850Below Target
High needsSGP = 39, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 39, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 67.0 39.0 -28.0 51.0No2225Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-16--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-7--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 15.5, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 15.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 40.0 15.5 -24.5 51.0No380Below Target
High needsSGP = 14, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 14, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 38.0 14.0 -24.0 51.0No220Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-16--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-7--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.09.00-
High needs- 60.09.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.09.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students8585100Yes8585100Yes2626100Yes
High needs5757100Yes5757100Yes16---
Econ. Disadvantaged4343100Yes4343100Yes13---
EL and Former EL7---7---1---
Students w/ disabilities3131100Yes3131100Yes9---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian4---4---2---
Afr. Amer./Black3737100Yes3737100Yes8---
Hispanic/Latino19---19---8---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.5---5---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White19---19---7---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles