Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Morse
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Morse
Organization Information
District:Cambridge (00490000)School type:Elementary School
School:Morse (00490045)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.9, Target = 90.7CPI = 85.9, Target = 90.7CPI = 85.9, Target = 90.7 86.1 82.2 85.9 3.7 90.7 93.1 5111950Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 79.8, Target = 87.8CPI = 79.8, Target = 87.8CPI = 79.8, Target = 87.8 81.7 76.4 79.8 3.4 87.8 90.9 697350Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 80.3, Target = 79.5CPI = 80.3, Target = 79.5 77.6 77.6 80.3 2.7 79.5 88.8 685775On Target
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 72.2, Target = 83.9CPI = 72.2, Target = 83.9CPI = 72.2, Target = 83.9 75.8 68.4 72.2 3.8 83.9 87.9 714450Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------12--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 78.3, Target = 90.6CPI = 78.3, Target = 90.6CPI = 78.3, Target = 90.6 85.9 76.7 78.3 1.6 90.6 93.0 694650Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
White  91.3---- 95.7-32--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88, Target = 87.7CPI = 88, Target = 87.7 81.6 79.6 88.0 8.4 87.7 90.8 6211975On Target
High needsCPI = 82.5, Target = 82.9CPI = 82.5, Target = 82.9 74.3 72.5 82.5 10.0 82.9 87.2 787375On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 83.8, Target = 75.4CPI = 83.8, Target = 75.4CPI = 83.8, Target = 75.4 73.2 73.2 83.8 10.6 75.4 86.6 8057100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 76.1, Target = 79.3CPI = 76.1, Target = 79.3CPI = 76.1, Target = 79.3 68.9 62.5 76.1 13.6 79.3 84.5 804450Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------12--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 81.5, Target = 84.2CPI = 81.5, Target = 84.2CPI = 81.5, Target = 84.2 76.3 72.7 81.5 8.8 84.2 88.2 834650Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
White  85.3---- 92.7-32--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 74.4, Target = 88.1CPI = 74.4, Target = 88.1CPI = 74.4, Target = 88.1 82.2 78.3 74.4 -3.9 88.1 91.1 32390Declined
High needs  73.9---- 87.0-25--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------16--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------4--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 8.8 16.811925 8.8 6.711925
High needs 7.0 12.37325 14.1 9.67325
Econ. Disadvantaged 8.8 12.35725 14.0 8.85725
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 4.54425 18.4 15.94425
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--12---12-
Afr. Amer./Black 2.3 8.74625 11.6 10.9460
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--14---14-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White--32---32-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 21.1 32.811925 10.5 5.911925
High needs 14.1 19.27325 16.9 9.67325
Econ. Disadvantaged 14.0 17.55725 17.5 8.85725
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities 2.6 6.84425 28.9 13.64425
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--12---12-
Afr. Amer./Black 4.7 8.74625 14.0 15.2460
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--14---14-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White--32---32-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 26.3 12.8390 7.9 7.7390
High needs--25---25-
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--13---13-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--16---16-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--4---4-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 44.5 54.0 9.5 51.0Yes6375On Target
High needsSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 42.0 46.0 4.0 51.0Yes3575On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 42.0 46.0 4.0 51.0No2950Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./BlackSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 41.5 44.0 2.5 51.0No2150Below Target
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-13--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 48.0 55.0 7.0 51.0Yes6375On Target
High needsSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 45.0 54.0 9.0 51.0Yes3575On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51 49.0 35.0 -14.0 51.0Yes2975On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./BlackSGP = 32.5, Target = 51SGP = 32.5, Target = 51SGP = 32.5, Target = 51 44.0 32.5 -11.5 51.0Yes2275On Target
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-13--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.07-
High needs- 60.07-
EL and Former EL- 60.07-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students125125100Yes125125100Yes3939100Yes
High needs7676100Yes7676100Yes2525100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged5959100Yes5959100Yes20---
EL and Former EL7---7-------
Students w/ disabilities4444100Yes4444100Yes13---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian13---13---3---
Afr. Amer./Black4747100Yes4747100Yes16---
Hispanic/Latino15---15---8---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.14---14---8---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1-------
White3434100Yes3434100Yes4---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles