Massachusetts School and District Profiles

King Open

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - King Open

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.7, Target = 85.7 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 86.7, Target = 85.775 or Higher All Students 78.6 81.4 86.7 5.3 85.7 89.3 5510575On Target
High needsCPI = 78.3, Target = 78.6 - High needsHigh needs-CPI = 78.3, Target = 78.675 or Higher High needs 67.9 72.4 78.3 5.9 78.6 84.0 636075On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 75, Target = 73.4 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 75, Target = 73.4CPI = 75, Target = 73.475 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 71.0 71.0 75.0 4.0 73.4 85.5 4136100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------16--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 70.3, Target = 70.7 - Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities-CPI = 70.3, Target = 70.775 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 56.0 62.8 70.3 7.5 70.7 78.0 653775On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------19--
Hispanic/Latino -------18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87, Target = 91.5 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 87, Target = 91.5 75 or Higher White 87.3 84.1 87.0 2.9 91.5 93.7 435050Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.1, Target = 86.4 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 87.1, Target = 86.475 or Higher All Students 79.6 82.3 87.1 4.8 86.4 89.8 5710575On Target
High needsCPI = 78.8, Target = 79.9 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 78.8, Target = 79.9 75 or Higher High needs 69.8 73.5 78.8 5.3 79.9 84.9 636075On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 75.7, Target = 76.1 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 75.7, Target = 76.175 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 73.9 73.9 75.7 1.8 76.1 87.0 463675On Target
EL and Former EL -------16--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 72.3, Target = 71.8 - Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities-CPI = 72.3, Target = 71.875 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 57.7 69.5 72.3 2.8 71.8 78.9 703775On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------19--
Hispanic/Latino -------18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.5, Target = 92 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 86.5, Target = 92 75 or Higher White 88.0 83.2 86.5 3.3 92.0 94.0 415050Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 76.8, Target = 78 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 76.8, Target = 78 75 or Higher All Students 67.0 72.9 76.8 3.9 78.0 83.5 382875On Target
High needs -------18--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------9--
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilities -------11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------12--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 12.4 21.010525 9.7 5.710525
High needs 4.5 15.06025 16.4 10.06025
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.5 11.13625 18.2 8.33625
EL and Former EL--16---16-
Students w/ disabilities 2.4 8.13725 24.4 16.23725
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--19---19-
Hispanic/Latino--18---18-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 18.2 20.0500 9.1 6.05025
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 29.2 38.110525 7.1 4.810525
High needs 16.4 23.36025 10.4 8.36025
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.1 25.03625 11.4 8.33625
EL and Former EL--16---16-
Students w/ disabilities 17.1 10.8370 17.1 10.83725
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--19---19-
Hispanic/Latino--18---18-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 38.2 46.05025 5.5 4.05025
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 11.4 14.32825 14.3 10.72825
High needs--18---18-
Econ. Disadvantaged--9---9-
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities--11---11-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--12---12-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 56, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 59.0 56.0 -3.0 51.0Yes5775On Target
High needsSGP = 55, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 60.5 55.0 -5.5 51.0Yes3375On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-15--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 61, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 5175 or Higher White 60.0 61.0 1.0 51.0Yes25100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 39, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 39, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 34.0 39.0 5.0 51.0Yes5775On Target
High needsSGP = 36, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 36, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 30.0 36.0 6.0 51.0Yes3375On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-15--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 51, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 51, Target = 5175 or Higher White 40.0 51.0 11.0 51.0Yes2575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.012.00-
High needs- 60.012.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.012.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students12010894No12010894No322994No
High needs666395Yes666395Yes21---
Econ. Disadvantaged383797Yes383797Yes10---
EL and Former EL17---17---5---
Students w/ disabilities413995Yes413995Yes13---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian7---7---3---
Afr. Amer./Black20---20---9---
Hispanic/Latino18---18---5---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.15---15---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White605190No605190No13---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles