Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Martin Luther King Jr.

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Martin Luther King Jr.

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.6, Target = 92.5 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 85.6, Target = 92.5 75 or Higher All Students 88.7 85.7 85.6 -0.1 92.5 94.4 5010125No Change
High needsCPI = 78.6, Target = 90.4 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 78.6, Target = 90.4 75 or Higher High needs 85.6 78.2 78.6 0.4 90.4 92.8 645550Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 77.5, Target = 81.9 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 77.5, Target = 81.9 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 80.3 80.3 77.5 -2.8 81.9 90.2 53400Declined
EL and Former EL -------12--
Students w/ disabilities  75.0---- 87.5-28--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------24--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 74.3, Target = 88.7 - Afr. Amer./Black75 or Higher Afr. Amer./BlackAfr. Amer./Black CPI = 74.3, Target = 88.7 75 or Higher Afr. Amer./Black 83.1 77.3 74.3 -3.0 88.7 91.6 49340Declined
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------26--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.1, Target = 86.5 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 85.1, Target = 86.5 75 or Higher All Students 79.7 80.8 85.1 4.3 86.5 89.9 4910150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 75.9, Target = 81.7 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 75.9, Target = 81.7 75 or Higher High needs 72.6 72.9 75.9 3.0 81.7 86.3 505550Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 77.5, Target = 74.7 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 77.5, Target = 74.7CPI = 77.5, Target = 74.775 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 72.4 72.4 77.5 5.1 74.7 86.2 5440100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------12--
Students w/ disabilities  65.0---- 82.5-28--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------24--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 76.5, Target = 82 - Afr. Amer./Black75 or Higher Afr. Amer./BlackAfr. Amer./Black CPI = 76.5, Target = 82 75 or Higher Afr. Amer./Black 73.0 68.8 76.5 7.7 82.0 86.5 693450Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------26--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 79.3, Target = 78 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 79.3, Target = 78CPI = 79.3, Target = 7875 or Higher All Students 67.0 85.4 79.3 -6.1 78.0 83.5 4529100Above Target
High needs -------18--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------15--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------8--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 19.5 28.710125 9.1 4.010125
High needs 4.3 10.95525 14.9 5.55525
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.3 10.04025 13.2 5.04025
EL and Former EL--12---12-
Students w/ disabilities--28---28-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--24---24-
Afr. Amer./Black 9.4 5.9340 15.6 11.83425
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--26---26-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 40.3 47.510125 10.4 10.91010
High needs 19.1 25.55525 17.0 18.2550
Econ. Disadvantaged 15.8 22.54025 15.8 15.0400
EL and Former EL--12---12-
Students w/ disabilities--28---28-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--24---24-
Afr. Amer./Black 18.8 29.43425 18.8 17.6340
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--26---26-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 8.3 24.12925 8.3 10.3290
High needs--18---18-
Econ. Disadvantaged--15---15-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--8---8-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 59, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 51.0 59.0 8.0 51.0No4975On Target
High needsSGP = 47, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 47, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 51.0 47.0 -4.0 51.0No3150Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-22--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-9--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-17--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-11--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 44, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 44, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 36.0 44.0 8.0 51.0Yes4975On Target
High needsSGP = 44, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 44, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 36.0 44.0 8.0 51.0Yes3175On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-22--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-9--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-17--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-11--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.013.00-
High needs- 60.013.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.013.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students109109100Yes109109100Yes3030100Yes
High needs6262100Yes6262100Yes19---
Econ. Disadvantaged4343100Yes4343100Yes16---
EL and Former EL17---17---4---
Students w/ disabilities3030100Yes3030100Yes11---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian26---26---6---
Afr. Amer./Black3636100Yes3636100Yes9---
Hispanic/Latino11---11---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.6---6---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White3030100Yes3030100Yes8---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles