Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Haggerty
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Haggerty
Organization Information
District:Cambridge (00490000)School type:Elementary School
School:Haggerty (00490020)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.1, Target = 93.1CPI = 87.1, Target = 93.1CPI = 87.1, Target = 93.1 88.2 89.2 87.1 -2.1 93.1 94.1 579725No Change
High needsCPI = 81.1, Target = 87CPI = 81.1, Target = 87CPI = 81.1, Target = 87 77.7 84.1 81.1 -3.0 87.0 88.9 75530Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 80.3, Target = 88.3CPI = 80.3, Target = 88.3CPI = 80.3, Target = 88.3 87.2 87.2 80.3 -6.9 88.3 93.6 68330Declined
EL and Former EL -------12--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 77.8, Target = 82.8CPI = 77.8, Target = 82.8CPI = 77.8, Target = 82.8 70.5 76.7 77.8 1.1 82.8 85.3 842750Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 82.1, Target = 85.4CPI = 82.1, Target = 85.4CPI = 82.1, Target = 85.4 75.0 87.1 82.1 -5.0 85.4 87.5 84280Declined
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 93.4, Target = 98CPI = 93.4, Target = 98CPI = 93.4, Target = 98 96.6 92.3 93.4 1.1 98.0 98.3 813875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.7, Target = 91.6CPI = 82.7, Target = 91.6CPI = 82.7, Target = 91.6 85.6 80.4 82.7 2.3 91.6 92.8 379750Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 73.6, Target = 86.3CPI = 73.6, Target = 86.3CPI = 73.6, Target = 86.3 76.5 71.1 73.6 2.5 86.3 88.3 405350Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 68.9, Target = 71.5CPI = 68.9, Target = 71.5CPI = 68.9, Target = 71.5 68.9 68.9 68.9 0.0 71.5 84.5 223325No Change
EL and Former EL -------12--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 72.2, Target = 82.2CPI = 72.2, Target = 82.2CPI = 72.2, Target = 82.2 69.4 61.2 72.2 11.0 82.2 84.7 702750Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 76.8, Target = 84.5CPI = 76.8, Target = 84.5CPI = 76.8, Target = 84.5 73.5 73.4 76.8 3.4 84.5 86.8 702850Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 92.8, Target = 96.8CPI = 92.8, Target = 96.8CPI = 92.8, Target = 96.8 94.5 87.0 92.8 5.8 96.8 97.3 793875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80, Target = 88.2CPI = 80, Target = 88.2CPI = 80, Target = 88.2 79.8 77.9 80.0 2.1 88.2 89.9 473050Improved Below Target
High needs -------14--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------10--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------12--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
White -------10--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 15.7 13.4970 2.9 5.2970
High needs 12.1 5.7530 5.2 9.4530
Econ. Disadvantaged 10.8 6.1330 0.0 6.1330
EL and Former EL--12---12-
Students w/ disabilities 10.3 3.7270 10.3 14.8270
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black 12.9 10.7280 3.2 10.7280
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--15---15-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 20.4 21.1380 2.0 2.6380
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 26.5 27.8970 10.8 11.3970
High needs 13.8 18.95325 17.2 17.0530
Econ. Disadvantaged 10.8 15.23325 16.2 21.2330
EL and Former EL--12---12-
Students w/ disabilities 13.8 18.52725 27.6 18.52725
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black 12.5 17.92825 15.6 14.3280
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--15---15-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 39.6 31.6380 4.2 5.3380
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 2.9 30.03025 14.3 6.73025
High needs--14---14-
Econ. Disadvantaged--10---10-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--8---8-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--12---12-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White--10---10-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 61.5 58.0 -3.5 51.0No6075On Target
High needsSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 48.5 56.0 7.5 51.0No3375On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-22--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-6--
Afr. Amer./BlackSGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51 64.0 45.5 -18.5 51.0No2050Below Target
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 72, Target = 51SGP = 72, Target = 51SGP = 72, Target = 51 62.0 72.0 10.0 51.0Yes23100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51 50.0 55.5 5.5 51.0Yes6075On Target
High needsSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 42.0 59.0 17.0 51.0No33100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-22--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-6--
Afr. Amer./BlackSGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51 43.0 47.5 4.5 51.0No2050Below Target
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 71, Target = 51SGP = 71, Target = 51SGP = 71, Target = 51 50.0 71.0 21.0 51.0Yes23100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.014-
High needs- 60.014-
EL and Former EL- 60.014-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students9797100Yes9797100Yes3030100Yes
High needs5353100Yes5353100Yes14---
Econ. Disadvantaged3333100Yes3333100Yes10---
EL and Former EL12---12-------
Students w/ disabilities2727100Yes2727100Yes8---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian10---10---2---
Afr. Amer./Black2828100Yes2828100Yes12---
Hispanic/Latino5---5---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.15---15---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1---1---
White3838100Yes3838100Yes10---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles