Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Maria L. Baldwin
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Maria L. Baldwin
Organization Information
District:Cambridge (00490000)School type:Elementary School
School:Maria L. Baldwin (00490005)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86, Target = 89.1CPI = 86, Target = 89.1CPI = 86, Target = 89.1 83.6 86.2 86.0 -0.2 89.1 91.8 5112125No Change
High needsCPI = 72.7, Target = 81.3CPI = 72.7, Target = 81.3CPI = 72.7, Target = 81.3 71.9 72.1 72.7 0.6 81.3 86.0 355450Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 73.4, Target = 74.8CPI = 73.4, Target = 74.8CPI = 73.4, Target = 74.8 72.5 72.5 73.4 0.9 74.8 86.3 333250Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 66, Target = 76.7CPI = 66, Target = 76.7CPI = 66, Target = 76.7 65.0 64.7 66.0 1.3 76.7 82.5 553950Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------13--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 73.6, Target = 76.5CPI = 73.6, Target = 76.5CPI = 73.6, Target = 76.5 64.7 80.3 73.6 -6.7 76.5 82.4 46360Declined
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96.6, Target = 95.9CPI = 96.6, Target = 95.9 93.9 92.7 96.6 3.9 95.9 97.0 9751100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 81.1, Target = 86.9CPI = 81.1, Target = 86.9CPI = 81.1, Target = 86.9 80.3 85.5 81.1 -4.4 86.9 90.2 311220Declined
High needsCPI = 65.7, Target = 76.8CPI = 65.7, Target = 76.8CPI = 65.7, Target = 76.8 65.2 74.5 65.7 -8.8 76.8 82.6 14540Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 65.6, Target = 75.5CPI = 65.6, Target = 75.5CPI = 65.6, Target = 75.5 73.3 73.3 65.6 -7.7 75.5 86.7 12320Declined
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 59, Target = 72.7CPI = 59, Target = 72.7CPI = 59, Target = 72.7 59.0 69.7 59.0 -10.7 72.7 79.5 34390Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------13--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 66.2, Target = 72.4CPI = 66.2, Target = 72.4CPI = 66.2, Target = 72.4 58.6 75.8 66.2 -9.6 72.4 79.3 24370Declined
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.7, Target = 93.3CPI = 91.7, Target = 93.3CPI = 91.7, Target = 93.3 89.9 90.8 91.7 0.9 93.3 95.0 735150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.4, Target = 88.5CPI = 82.4, Target = 88.5CPI = 82.4, Target = 88.5 82.7 89.3 82.4 -6.9 88.5 91.4 55440Declined
High needs  54.3---- 77.2-20--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------11--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------12--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------24--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 23.6 27.312125 6.3 8.31210
High needs 3.8 11.15425 15.4 16.7540
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.3 9.43225 16.7 15.6320
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities 2.6 5.13925 20.5 23.1390
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--13---13-
Afr. Amer./Black 6.1 2.8360 9.1 13.9360
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 32.8 43.15125 3.4 2.05125
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 34.9 36.11220 5.6 10.71220
High needs 15.7 11.1540 13.7 20.4540
Econ. Disadvantaged 13.8 9.4320 13.8 18.8320
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities 7.9 5.1390 15.8 25.6390
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--13---13-
Afr. Amer./Black 6.1 5.4370 9.1 21.6370
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 49.1 51.0510 1.8 2.0510
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 40.5 29.5440 2.4 6.8440
High needs--20---20-
Econ. Disadvantaged--11---11-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--12---12-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--24---24-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51 49.0 67.0 18.0 51.0No77100Above Target
High needsSGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51 39.0 66.0 27.0 51.0No33100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-17--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 31.0 53.0 22.0 51.0No26100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-6--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-25--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 71, Target = 51SGP = 71, Target = 51SGP = 71, Target = 51 50.0 71.0 21.0 51.0Yes35100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 33.5 42.0 8.5 51.0No7650Below Target
High needsSGP = 37.5, Target = 51SGP = 37.5, Target = 51SGP = 37.5, Target = 51 30.5 37.5 7.0 51.0No3250Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-16--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 23.0 37.0 14.0 51.0No2575On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-6--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-25--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 50.5, Target = 51SGP = 50.5, Target = 51 34.0 50.5 16.5 51.0Yes34100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.012-
High needs- 60.012-
EL and Former EL- 60.012-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students12512499Yes125125100Yes4545100Yes
High needs5757100Yes5757100Yes2121100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged3333100Yes3333100Yes11---
EL and Former EL6---6-------
Students w/ disabilities4242100Yes4242100Yes17---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian13---13---2---
Afr. Amer./Black383797Yes3838100Yes12---
Hispanic/Latino12---12---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.9---9---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White5353100Yes5353100Yes2525100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles