Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Francis Wyman Elementary

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Francis Wyman Elementary

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.9, Target = 92.2 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 83.9, Target = 92.2 75 or Higher All Students 86.7 84.9 83.9 -1.0 92.2 93.4 4224625No Change
High needsCPI = 65.6, Target = 81.6 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 65.6, Target = 81.6 75 or Higher High needs 68.5 67.6 65.6 -2.0 81.6 84.3 126925No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 74.2, Target = 81.1 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 74.2, Target = 81.1 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 79.4 79.4 74.2 -5.2 81.1 89.7 37310Declined
EL and Former EL -------18--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 55.6, Target = 77.4 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 55.6, Target = 77.4 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 61.2 50.0 55.6 5.6 77.4 80.6 263650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 93.2, Target = 92.5 - AsianAsian-CPI = 93.2, Target = 92.575 or Higher Asian 87.1 90.5 93.2 2.7 92.5 93.6 484475On Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------21--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83.1, Target = 93.3 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 83.1, Target = 93.3 75 or Higher White 88.5 84.6 83.1 -1.5 93.3 94.3 2316325No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.8, Target = 90.9 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 83.8, Target = 90.9 75 or Higher All Students 84.4 82.6 83.8 1.2 90.9 92.2 4324550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 64, Target = 79.1 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 64, Target = 79.1 75 or Higher High needs 64.1 68.8 64.0 -4.8 79.1 82.1 11680Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 77.4, Target = 77.1 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 77.4, Target = 77.175 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 75.0 75.0 77.4 2.4 77.1 87.5 533175On Target
EL and Former EL -------18--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 47.1, Target = 75 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 47.1, Target = 75 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 57.2 53.8 47.1 -6.7 75.0 78.6 11350Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 96.6, Target = 89.6 - AsianAsian-CPI = 96.6, Target = 89.6CPI = 96.6, Target = 89.675 or Higher Asian 82.1 92.6 96.6 4.0 89.6 91.1 5544100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------21--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 82.4, Target = 92 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 82.4, Target = 92 75 or Higher White 86.3 81.0 82.4 1.4 92.0 93.2 2216250Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 72.7, Target = 93.5 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 72.7, Target = 93.5 75 or Higher All Students 88.8 77.1 72.7 -4.4 93.5 94.4 28870Declined
High needs  72.7---- 86.4-25--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------8--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------14--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 71.3, Target = 93.9 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 71.3, Target = 93.9 75 or Higher White 89.5 78.3 71.3 -7.0 93.9 94.8 10610Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 7.6 6.12460 6.0 8.92460
High needs 1.6 0.0690 18.8 21.7690
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.9 0.0310 8.8 12.9310
EL and Former EL--18---18-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0360 33.3 30.6360
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 16.2 9.1440 8.1 2.34425
Afr. Amer./Black--21---21-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 7.3 5.51630 6.1 9.81630
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 23.7 29.024525 7.6 8.22450
High needs 14.1 16.26825 21.9 25.0680
Econ. Disadvantaged 17.6 22.63125 11.8 6.53125
EL and Former EL--18---18-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 5.73525 36.4 42.9350
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 54.1 59.1440 5.4 2.34425
Afr. Amer./Black--21---21-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 20.1 24.716225 8.9 9.91620
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 2.4 10.38725 8.4 14.9870
High needs--25---25-
Econ. Disadvantaged--8---8-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--14---14-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 1.6 9.86125 4.9 14.8610
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All students --- 51.0-164--
High needs --- 51.0-43--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-26--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-10--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-118--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All students --- 51.0-164--
High needs --- 51.0-43--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-26--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-10--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-118--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 80.0 60.024.0025
High needs 80.0 60.024.0025
EL and Former EL- 60.024.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students25725599Yes25725599Yes9191100Yes
High needs787799Yes787799Yes2929100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged3636100Yes3636100Yes10---
EL and Former EL25---25---7---
Students w/ disabilities3838100Yes383797Yes16---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian494898Yes4949100Yes16---
Afr. Amer./Black22---22---6---
Hispanic/Latino13---13---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7---5---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White166166100Yes16616599Yes6262100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles