Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Michael Driscoll

District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Michael Driscoll

Organization Information
District:Brookline (00460000)School type:Elementary-Middle School
School:Michael Driscoll (00460020)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.5, Target = 96.3 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 92.5, Target = 96.3 75 or Higher All Students 93.7 92.4 92.5 0.1 96.3 96.9 8537475On Target
High needsCPI = 76.5, Target = 90.1 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 76.5, Target = 90.1 75 or Higher High needs 83.0 76.9 76.5 -0.4 90.1 91.5 5510025No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------31--
EL and Former EL -------13--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 72.4, Target = 89.2 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 72.4, Target = 89.2 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 81.5 74.0 72.4 -1.6 89.2 90.8 787625No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 94.8, Target = 97.8 - Asian75 or Higher AsianAsian CPI = 94.8, Target = 97.8 75 or Higher Asian 96.2 91.2 94.8 3.6 97.8 98.1 7543100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black  85.7---- 92.9-26--
Hispanic/Latino  84.0---- 92.0-29--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.CPI = 96.5, Target = 96.4 - Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-CPI = 96.5, Target = 96.475 or Higher Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 93.8 95.1 96.5 1.4 96.4 96.9 6857100Above Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.4, Target = 97.3 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 94.4, Target = 97.3 75 or Higher White 95.3 94.6 94.4 -0.2 97.3 97.7 81219100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.2, Target = 96.2 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 91.2, Target = 96.2 75 or Higher All Students 93.5 89.7 91.2 1.5 96.2 96.8 90374100Above Target
High needsCPI = 72.5, Target = 90.6 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 72.5, Target = 90.6 75 or Higher High needs 83.9 68.3 72.5 4.2 90.6 92.0 6810050Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------31--
EL and Former EL -------13--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 67.4, Target = 88.5 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 67.4, Target = 88.5 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 80.2 65.9 67.4 1.5 88.5 90.1 857650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 93.6, Target = 98.3 - Asian75 or Higher AsianAsian CPI = 93.6, Target = 98.3 75 or Higher Asian 97.0 91.2 93.6 2.4 98.3 98.5 6643100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black  70.2---- 85.1-26--
Hispanic/Latino  81.0---- 90.5-29--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.CPI = 95.6, Target = 97 - Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.75 or Higher Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. CPI = 95.6, Target = 97 75 or Higher Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 94.8 94.1 95.6 1.5 97.0 97.4 7857100Above Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93, Target = 97.6 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 93, Target = 97.6 75 or Higher White 95.8 91.4 93.0 1.6 97.6 97.9 84219100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.7, Target = 91.1 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 85.7, Target = 91.1 75 or Higher All Students 84.7 89.6 85.7 -3.9 91.1 92.4 8612175On Target
High needsCPI = 64.5, Target = 85.9 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 64.5, Target = 85.9 75 or Higher High needs 78.8 75.0 64.5 -10.5 85.9 89.4 72310Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------14--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------18--
Afr. Amer./Black -------11--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.7, Target = 92 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 88.7, Target = 92 75 or Higher White 86.3 90.1 88.7 -1.4 92.0 93.2 8071100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 24.6 21.13740 4.0 3.73740
High needs 6.7 7.01000 14.4 14.01000
Econ. Disadvantaged--31---31-
EL and Former EL--13---13-
Students w/ disabilities 5.4 6.67625 16.2 18.4760
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 27.8 27.9430 9.3 4.74325
Afr. Amer./Black--26---26-
Hispanic/Latino--29---29-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 33.3 28.1570 2.0 1.85725
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 24.6 20.52190 1.4 1.82190
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 46.9 51.937425 5.4 6.13740
High needs 15.6 13.01000 18.9 22.01000
Econ. Disadvantaged--31---31-
EL and Former EL--13---13-
Students w/ disabilities 14.9 11.8760 23.0 27.6760
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 53.7 60.54325 1.9 4.7430
Afr. Amer./Black--26---26-
Hispanic/Latino--29---29-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 51.0 64.95725 2.0 1.85725
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 49.3 52.12190 3.9 3.72190
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 20.4 24.812125 3.5 9.11210
High needs 0.0 12.93125 13.3 29.0310
Econ. Disadvantaged--14---14-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--18---18-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--18---18-
Afr. Amer./Black--11---11-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--15---15-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 15.1 31.07125 2.7 5.6710
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 58, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 56.0 58.0 2.0 51.0No28375On Target
High needsSGP = 54, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 50.0 54.0 4.0 51.0No7775On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-25--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 53.5, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities-SGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 5175 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 48.0 53.5 5.5 51.0No6675On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
AsianSGP = 69, Target = 51 - AsianAsian-SGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 5175 or Higher Asian 60.0 69.0 9.0 51.0Yes35100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-20--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-45--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 54, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 5175 or Higher White 55.5 54.0 -1.5 51.0No16575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 65, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 62.0 65.0 3.0 51.0Yes283100Above Target
High needsSGP = 59, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 50.0 59.0 9.0 51.0Yes7775On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-25--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 56.5, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities-SGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 5175 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 48.5 56.5 8.0 51.0No6675On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
AsianSGP = 66, Target = 51 - AsianAsian-SGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 5175 or Higher Asian 71.0 66.0 -5.0 51.0Yes35100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-20--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.SGP = 60, Target = 51 - Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 5175 or Higher Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 65.0 60.0 -5.0 51.0Yes45100Above Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 67, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 5175 or Higher White 60.0 67.0 7.0 51.0Yes165100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.09.00-
High needs- 60.09.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.09.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students400400100Yes398398100Yes132132100Yes
High needs124124100Yes124124100Yes4242100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged3535100Yes3535100Yes17---
EL and Former EL35---35---14---
Students w/ disabilities7676100Yes7676100Yes18---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian5454100Yes5252100Yes23---
Afr. Amer./Black2626100Yes2626100Yes11---
Hispanic/Latino3333100Yes3333100Yes7---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.5858100Yes5858100Yes15---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White229229100Yes229229100Yes7676100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles