Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Downey

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Downey

Organization Information
District:	Brockton (00440000)	School type:	Elementary School
School:	Downey (00440110)	Grades served:	K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:	Commissioner's Districts	Title I status:	Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:			Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		67.0	64.9	66.2	1.3	80.8	83.5	5	311	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		65.6	61.8	62.8	1.0	79.9	82.8	8	232	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		61.9	61.9	63.0	1.1	65.1	81.0	7	192	50	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL		60.8	60.2	66.0	5.8	77.1	80.4	37	36	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		60.2	54.7	54.9	0.2	76.8	80.1	25	71	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		67.8	63.0	62.3	-0.7	81.2	83.9	11	155	25	No Change
Hispanic/Latino		55.9	61.6	63.8	2.2	74.3	78.0	16	49	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		68.9	71.1	72.5	1.4	81.9	84.5	4	81	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		67.5	72.4	70.9	-1.5	81.0	83.8	10	310	25	No Change
High needs		66.7	69.9	67.3	-2.6	80.6	83.4	18	231	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		70.6	70.6	67.6	-3.0	73.1	85.3	18	192	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		61.9	66.3	73.6	7.3	77.8	81.0	48	36	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		62.0	59.7	58.2	-1.5	77.8	81.0	31	70	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		64.1	70.1	66.9	-3.2	79.1	82.1	28	154	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino		62.0	70.3	69.4	-0.9	77.8	81.0	36	49	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		73.4	78.0	76.5	-1.5	84.5	86.7	9	81	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		61.4	67.6	62.4	-5.2	77.5	80.7	15	107	0	Declined
High needs		59.5	65.1	59.4	-5.7	76.4	79.8	26	85	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		65.2	65.2	56.8	-8.4	68.1	82.6	30	73	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		58.7	-	69.0	11.5	72.5	79.4	72	25	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		58.3	67.0	58.2	-8.8	75.7	79.2	59	55	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		64.3	-	-	-	-	82.2	-	28	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.3	1.9	311	25	23.6	21.2	311	25
High needs	0.8	1.7	232	25	28.0	25.0	232	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.9	1.6	192	25	26.4	24.5	192	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	5.6	36	25	34.1	22.2	36	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	71	0	44.0	35.2	71	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Afr. Amer./Black	1.3	2.6	155	25	28.8	26.5	155	0
Hispanic/Latino	1.7	0.0	49	0	20.7	22.4	49	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	1.3	2.5	81	25	15.8	14.8	81	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	5.5	7.1	310	25	19.0	20.3	310	0
High needs	5.8	5.2	231	0	22.9	23.4	231	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.7	5.2	192	0	21.5	21.9	192	0
EL and Former EL	4.7	8.3	36	25	23.3	22.2	36	0
Students w/ disabilities	1.3	0.0	70	0	42.7	37.1	70	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Afr. Amer./Black	3.9	6.5	154	25	22.9	25.3	154	0
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	2.0	49	25	24.1	20.4	49	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	11.8	11.1	81	0	9.2	13.6	81	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	6.1	3.7	107	0	14.3	20.6	107	0
High needs	2.8	3.5	85	25	18.3	24.7	85	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	3.3	4.1	73	25	16.4	27.4	73	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	4.0	25	25	40.0	24.0	25	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	5.7	1.8	55	0	18.9	23.6	55	0
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	28	-	-	-	28	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		33.0	55.0	22.0	51.0	No	183	100	Above Target
High needs		31.0	50.0	19.0	51.0	No	139	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		31.0	50.0	19.0	51.0	No	115	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		34.0	54.5	20.5	51.0	No	26	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		29.0	35.0	6.0	51.0	No	32	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		33.5	50.0	16.5	51.0	No	95	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		33.0	51.5	18.5	51.0	No	30	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		35.0	59.0	24.0	51.0	No	47	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		52.5	40.5	-12.0	51.0	No	182	50	Below Target
High needs		53.0	39.0	-14.0	51.0	No	138	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		54.0	38.0	-16.0	51.0	No	115	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		58.0	46.0	-12.0	51.0	Yes	26	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		43.0	16.0	-27.0	51.0	No	31	0	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		52.5	44.5	-8.0	51.0	No	94	50	Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		49.0	40.5	-8.5	51.0	No	30	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		50.5	37.0	-13.5	51.0	No	47	25	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	51.5	60.0	34	0
High needs	51.5	60.0	34	0
EL and Former EL	51.5	60.0	34	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	331	330	100	Yes	330	329	100	Yes	109	109	100	Yes
High needs	250	249	100	Yes	249	248	100	Yes	87	87	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	208	207	100	Yes	208	207	100	Yes	74	74	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	40	40	100	Yes	40	40	100	Yes	18	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	77	76	99	Yes	76	75	99	Yes	26	26	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	7	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	167	167	100	Yes	166	166	100	Yes	57	57	100	Yes
Hispanic/Latino	51	50	98	Yes	51	50	98	Yes	16	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	19	-	-	-	19	-	-	-	7	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	86	86	100	Yes	86	86	100	Yes	28	28	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Downey

Downey (00440110)

2016 Accountability Data - Downey

School and District Profiles