Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Hancock

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Hancock

Organization Information

District:

Brockton (00440000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Hancock (00440045)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		76.5	67.0	74.7	7.7	86.3	88.3	15	342	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		71.8	60.6	69.3	8.7	83.6	85.9	22	201	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		60.9	60.9	68.3	7.4	64.2	80.5	18	169	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		77.0	59.4	69.0	9.6	86.6	88.5	43	42	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		44.0	44.6	60.7	16.1	67.3	72.0	39	28	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		70.9	58.5	70.2	11.7	83.0	85.5	35	160	50	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		64.1	70.4	77.2	6.8	79.1	82.1	70	34	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		82.4	75.2	79.5	4.3	89.7	91.2	14	117	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		72.1	72.2	74.6	2.4	83.7	86.1	14	342	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		66.9	65.8	69.8	4.0	80.7	83.5	25	201	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		66.2	66.2	69.1	2.9	69.0	83.1	22	169	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		74.6	63.3	69.6	6.3	85.2	87.3	36	42	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		39.3	53.6	59.8	6.2	64.6	69.7	35	28	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		64.5	63.8	70.3	6.5	79.3	82.3	43	160	50	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		61.7	72.4	68.4	-4.0	77.7	80.9	33	34	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		77.9	79.1	80.8	1.7	87.1	89.0	17	117	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		66.9	64.2	57.6	-6.6	80.7	83.5	11	112	0	Declined
High needs		63.3	57.1	50.4	-6.7	78.6	81.7	12	67	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		59.9	59.9	51.8	-8.1	63.2	80.0	21	55	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		60.2	52.4	54.6	2.2	76.8	80.1	50	54	50	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		75.0	73.0	62.8	-10.2	85.4	87.5	4	37	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	3.0	3.8	342	25	19.1	14.0	342	25
High needs	2.2	1.0	201	0	24.6	17.9	201	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	2.6	1.2	169	0	22.7	18.3	169	25
EL and Former EL	3.1	0.0	42	0	34.4	16.7	42	25
Students w/ disabilities	3.6	0.0	28	0	50.0	32.1	28	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Afr. Amer./Black	0.0	1.3	160	25	29.0	17.5	160	25
Hispanic/Latino	7.9	2.9	34	0	10.5	8.8	34	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	3.3	6.0	117	25	8.1	11.1	117	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	11.3	13.7	342	25	15.8	14.9	342	0
High needs	5.6	9.5	201	25	21.8	19.9	201	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	6.5	10.1	169	25	22.1	21.3	169	0
EL and Former EL	6.3	7.1	42	25	28.1	19.0	42	25
Students w/ disabilities	3.6	7.1	28	25	35.7	32.1	28	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Afr. Amer./Black	5.1	10.0	160	25	26.1	18.8	160	25
Hispanic/Latino	10.5	2.9	34	0	13.2	17.6	34	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	16.3	19.7	117	25	8.1	7.7	117	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	2.9	2.7	112	0	22.5	22.3	112	0
High needs	0.0	0.0	67	0	32.6	29.9	67	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	0.0	55	0	28.9	29.1	55	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Afr. Amer./Black	0.0	3.7	54	25	35.7	25.9	54	25
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	5.3	2.7	37	0	10.5	18.9	37	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		35.0	52.0	17.0	51.0	Yes	213	100	Above Target
High needs		27.0	49.0	22.0	51.0	Yes	129	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		28.0	49.0	21.0	51.0	Yes	105	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	26	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	22	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		27.0	44.0	17.0	51.0	Yes	98	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	26	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
White		39.0	61.0	22.0	51.0	Yes	68	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		50.0	43.0	-7.0	51.0	No	213	50	Below Target
High needs		45.5	45.0	-0.5	51.0	No	129	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		45.0	45.0	0.0	51.0	No	105	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	26	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	22	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		44.5	36.5	-8.0	51.0	Yes	98	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	26	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
White		58.0	46.5	-11.5	51.0	Yes	68	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	66.0	60.0	39.00	25
High needs	66.0	60.0	39.00	25
EL and Former EL	66.0	60.0	39.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	357	355	99	Yes	357	355	99	Yes	114	114	100	Yes
High needs	211	211	100	Yes	211	211	100	Yes	69	69	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	179	179	100	Yes	179	179	100	Yes	57	57	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	43	43	100	Yes	43	43	100	Yes	13	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	29	29	100	Yes	29	29	100	Yes	9	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	16	-	-	-	16	-	-	-	8	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	171	170	99	Yes	171	170	99	Yes	55	55	100	Yes
Hispanic/Latino	34	34	100	Yes	34	34	100	Yes	8	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	13	-	-	-	13	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	121	120	99	Yes	121	120	99	Yes	38	38	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.