Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Archie T Morrison
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Archie T Morrison
Organization Information
District:Braintree (00400000)School type:Elementary School
School:Archie T Morrison (00400033)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94, Target = 96.9CPI = 94, Target = 96.9CPI = 94, Target = 96.9 94.7 92.4 94.0 1.6 96.9 97.4 8920375On Target
High needsCPI = 90.7, Target = 94.9CPI = 90.7, Target = 94.9CPI = 90.7, Target = 94.9 91.3 88.2 90.7 2.5 94.9 95.7 989175On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 89.1, Target = 89.6CPI = 89.1, Target = 89.6 88.6 88.6 89.1 0.5 89.6 94.3 956275On Target
EL and Former EL  88.6---- 94.3-29--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 86.8, Target = 95CPI = 86.8, Target = 95CPI = 86.8, Target = 95 91.5 82.6 86.8 4.2 95.0 95.8 973675On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian  94.8---- 97.4-25--
Afr. Amer./Black -------22--
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.6, Target = 97.4CPI = 94.6, Target = 97.4CPI = 94.6, Target = 97.4 95.5 93.1 94.6 1.5 97.4 97.8 89144100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89, Target = 93.3CPI = 89, Target = 93.3CPI = 89, Target = 93.3 88.5 88.6 89.0 0.4 93.3 94.3 6620350Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 85.7, Target = 88.4CPI = 85.7, Target = 88.4CPI = 85.7, Target = 88.4 80.1 85.1 85.7 0.6 88.4 90.1 889150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 83.1, Target = 87.2CPI = 83.1, Target = 87.2CPI = 83.1, Target = 87.2 86.0 86.0 83.1 -2.9 87.2 93.0 78620Declined
EL and Former EL  88.6---- 94.3-29--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 77.8, Target = 87.3CPI = 77.8, Target = 87.3CPI = 77.8, Target = 87.3 78.2 80.6 77.8 -2.8 87.3 89.1 83360Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian  99.0---- 99.5-25--
Afr. Amer./Black -------22--
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.6, Target = 94.2CPI = 89.6, Target = 94.2CPI = 89.6, Target = 94.2 90.1 88.7 89.6 0.9 94.2 95.1 6014450Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.5, Target = 88.4CPI = 87.5, Target = 88.4 80.1 82.9 87.5 4.6 88.4 90.1 736475On Target
High needsCPI = 79.6, Target = 80.2CPI = 79.6, Target = 80.2 66.1 74.1 79.6 5.5 80.2 83.1 862775On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------21--
EL and Former EL -------10--
Students w/ disabilities -------8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.8, Target = 88.5CPI = 90.8, Target = 88.5CPI = 90.8, Target = 88.5 80.3 83.8 90.8 7.0 88.5 90.2 8046100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 20.0 20.22030 1.6 2.02030
High needs 12.6 9.9910 2.3 2.2910
Econ. Disadvantaged 14.0 9.7620 3.5 3.2620
EL and Former EL--29---29-
Students w/ disabilities 5.6 8.33625 5.6 5.6360
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--25---25-
Afr. Amer./Black--22---22-
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 22.2 23.61440 1.4 1.41440
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 34.7 38.420325 2.1 3.02030
High needs 24.1 28.69125 4.6 5.5910
Econ. Disadvantaged 24.6 22.6620 3.5 6.5620
EL and Former EL--29---29-
Students w/ disabilities 8.3 30.63625 8.3 13.9360
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--25---25-
Afr. Amer./Black--22---22-
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 32.6 38.914425 2.1 2.81440
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 23.8 26.66425 7.9 3.16425
High needs 7.4 7.4270 11.1 3.72725
Econ. Disadvantaged--21---21-
EL and Former EL--10---10-
Students w/ disabilities--8---8-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.6 32.64625 5.9 0.04625
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51 51.0 44.5 -6.5 51.0Yes12075On Target
High needsSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 30.0 54.0 24.0 51.0Yes51100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 42.5 57.0 14.5 51.0No37100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-18--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-18--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-9--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51 45.0 42.5 -2.5 51.0Yes8875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 25.5, Target = 51SGP = 25.5, Target = 51SGP = 25.5, Target = 51 33.5 25.5 -8.0 51.0Yes12075On Target
High needsSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 28.0 34.0 6.0 51.0Yes5175On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 29, Target = 51SGP = 29, Target = 51SGP = 29, Target = 51 33.0 29.0 -4.0 51.0No370Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-18--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-18--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-9--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 23.5, Target = 51SGP = 23.5, Target = 51SGP = 23.5, Target = 51 33.0 23.5 -9.5 51.0Yes8875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 69.5 60.02825
High needs 69.5 60.02825
EL and Former EL 69.5 60.028-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students21921799Yes21921799Yes6565100Yes
High needs10210199Yes10210199Yes2828100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged686799Yes686799Yes22---
EL and Former EL373697Yes373697Yes10---
Students w/ disabilities3838100Yes3838100Yes9---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian3333100Yes3333100Yes8---
Afr. Amer./Black22---22---8---
Hispanic/Latino12---12---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White14914799Yes14914799Yes4646100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles