Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Highlands
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Highlands
Organization Information
District:Braintree (00400000)School type:Elementary School
School:Highlands (00400015)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.3, Target = 96.9CPI = 92.3, Target = 96.9CPI = 92.3, Target = 96.9 94.6 89.9 92.3 2.4 96.9 97.3 8023875On Target
High needsCPI = 85.3, Target = 90.7CPI = 85.3, Target = 90.7CPI = 85.3, Target = 90.7 84.1 77.9 85.3 7.4 90.7 92.1 888550Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 84.8, Target = 83.2CPI = 84.8, Target = 83.2CPI = 84.8, Target = 83.2 81.7 81.7 84.8 3.1 83.2 90.9 8633100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 82.4, Target = 88.5CPI = 82.4, Target = 88.5CPI = 82.4, Target = 88.5 80.3 74.1 82.4 8.3 88.5 90.2 925475On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------22--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.4, Target = 97CPI = 92.4, Target = 97CPI = 92.4, Target = 97 94.8 89.3 92.4 3.1 97.0 97.4 7520375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.3, Target = 95.1CPI = 86.3, Target = 95.1CPI = 86.3, Target = 95.1 91.6 87.9 86.3 -1.6 95.1 95.8 5323825No Change
High needsCPI = 76.8, Target = 87.5CPI = 76.8, Target = 87.5CPI = 76.8, Target = 87.5 78.5 76.6 76.8 0.2 87.5 89.3 548550Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 78.8, Target = 81.7CPI = 78.8, Target = 81.7CPI = 78.8, Target = 81.7 80.0 80.0 78.8 -1.2 81.7 90.0 613325No Change
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 74.5, Target = 84.5CPI = 74.5, Target = 84.5CPI = 74.5, Target = 84.5 73.4 73.6 74.5 0.9 84.5 86.7 765450Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------22--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.5, Target = 95.2CPI = 86.5, Target = 95.2CPI = 86.5, Target = 95.2 91.8 87.9 86.5 -1.4 95.2 95.9 4120325No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.5, Target = 96CPI = 88.5, Target = 96CPI = 88.5, Target = 96 93.1 91.7 88.5 -3.2 96.0 96.6 77960Declined
High needs  85.7---- 92.9-30--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------15--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.6, Target = 96.7CPI = 88.6, Target = 96.7CPI = 88.6, Target = 96.7 94.4 92.2 88.6 -3.6 96.7 97.2 68830Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 13.3 23.123825 2.7 1.723825
High needs 5.2 11.88525 7.8 3.58525
Econ. Disadvantaged 10.0 15.23325 10.0 3.03325
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities 3.8 9.35425 11.3 5.65425
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--22---22-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 13.2 22.720325 3.0 1.520325
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 23.9 32.823825 2.2 4.62380
High needs 10.4 11.88525 5.2 8.2850
Econ. Disadvantaged 23.3 18.2330 6.7 9.1330
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities 3.8 7.45425 7.5 7.4540
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--22---22-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.8 32.520325 2.5 5.42030
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 26.4 24.0960 2.8 2.19625
High needs--30---30-
Econ. Disadvantaged--15---15-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--14---14-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 24.6 24.1830 3.3 2.48325
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 40.0 46.0 6.0 51.0Yes15975On Target
High needsSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 33.0 54.0 21.0 51.0Yes55100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-24--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 30.0 44.0 14.0 51.0Yes3375On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-10--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51 37.0 49.5 12.5 51.0Yes14075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51 47.0 28.0 -19.0 51.0No1590Below Target
High needsSGP = 23, Target = 51SGP = 23, Target = 51SGP = 23, Target = 51 44.0 23.0 -21.0 51.0Yes5575On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-24--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 26, Target = 51SGP = 26, Target = 51SGP = 26, Target = 51 44.0 26.0 -18.0 51.0Yes3375On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-10--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 29.5, Target = 51SGP = 29.5, Target = 51SGP = 29.5, Target = 51 47.0 29.5 -17.5 51.0No1400Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.012-
High needs- 60.012-
EL and Former EL- 60.012-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students24924197Yes24924197Yes979699Yes
High needs898899Yes898899Yes313097Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged3434100Yes3434100Yes15---
EL and Former EL14---14---4---
Students w/ disabilities555498Yes555498Yes15---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian24---24---8---
Afr. Amer./Black6---6---1---
Hispanic/Latino6---6---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.1---1---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White21220496Yes21220496Yes848399Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles