Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Bournedale Elementary School
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Bournedale Elementary School
Organization Information
District:Bourne (00360000)School type:Elementary School
School:Bournedale Elementary School (00360005)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.7, Target = 94.5 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 84.7, Target = 94.5 75 or Higher All Students 90.5 86.0 84.7 -1.3 94.5 95.3 4613225No Change
High needsCPI = 72.4, Target = 88.2 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 72.4, Target = 88.2 75 or Higher High needs 79.7 74.0 72.4 -1.6 88.2 89.9 344925No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 77.3, Target = 84.7 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 77.3, Target = 84.7 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 83.3 83.3 77.3 -6.0 84.7 91.7 52320Declined
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.9, Target = 94.6 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 84.9, Target = 94.6 75 or Higher White 90.7 86.9 84.9 -2.0 94.6 95.4 3212125No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.7, Target = 92.8 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 83.7, Target = 92.8 75 or Higher All Students 87.6 80.9 83.7 2.8 92.8 93.8 4213250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 73, Target = 86.5 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 73, Target = 86.5 75 or Higher High needs 76.9 65.9 73.0 7.1 86.5 88.5 374950Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 81.3, Target = 78.6 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 81.3, Target = 78.6CPI = 81.3, Target = 78.675 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 76.7 76.7 81.3 4.6 78.6 88.4 7132100Above Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.1, Target = 92.8 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 84.1, Target = 92.8 75 or Higher White 87.7 81.3 84.1 2.8 92.8 93.9 2912150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 14.9 8.31320 2.7 6.81320
High needs 7.7 2.0490 7.7 14.3490
Econ. Disadvantaged 13.3 3.1320 0.0 9.4320
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--23---23-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 14.9 8.31210 3.0 6.61210
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 15.5 21.213225 8.8 5.313225
High needs 5.8 12.24925 23.1 12.24925
Econ. Disadvantaged 6.7 15.63225 13.3 6.33225
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--23---23-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 14.9 23.112125 9.0 5.812125
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 38, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 38, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 51.5 38.0 -13.5 51.0No6725Below Target
High needs --- 51.0-17--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-10--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 38, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 38, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 50.5 38.0 -12.5 51.0No6125Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 28, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 28, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 46.0 28.0 -18.0 51.0No670Below Target
High needs --- 51.0-17--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-10--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 28, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 28, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 49.0 28.0 -21.0 51.0No610Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students14614599Yes14614599Yes----
High needs5656100Yes5656100Yes----
Econ. Disadvantaged3838100Yes3838100Yes----
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities26---26-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian1---1-------
Afr. Amer./Black1---1-------
Hispanic/Latino6---6-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White13413399Yes13413399Yes----

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles