Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Snowden International High School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Snowden International School at Copley

Organization Information

District:

Boston (00350000)

School type:

High School

School:

Snowden International School at Copley (00350690)

Grades served:

09,10,11,12

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		90.1	96.1	94.4	-1.7	94.2	95.1	17	71	75	On Target
High needs		88.7	95.2	92.6	-2.6	93.4	94.4	33	54	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		97.5	97.5	94.8	-2.7	97.7	98.8	40	43	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		84.5	96.2	97.0	0.8	91.0	92.3	69	25	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		94.7	96.6	91.2	-5.4	96.9	97.4	40	34	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		78.4	86.6	85.0	-1.6	87.4	89.2	23	70	25	No Change
High needs		76.6	85.0	81.1	-3.9	86.4	88.3	44	53	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		87.0	87.0	83.7	-3.3	88.1	93.5	43	43	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		69.4	86.3	81.0	-5.3	82.2	84.7	52	25	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		80.5	87.5	87.9	0.4	88.6	90.3	84	33	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		66.8	81.3	77.6	-3.7	80.6	83.4	14	68	0	Declined
High needs		66.1	79.5	73.6	-5.9	80.2	83.1	19	53	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		81.7	81.7	77.3	-4.4	83.2	90.9	25	43	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		59.3	83.1	84.0	0.9	76.3	79.7	73	25	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		68.6	-	-	-	-	84.3	-	31	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	19.7	14.1	71	0	1.3	4.2	71	0
High needs	14.0	9.3	54	0	1.8	5.6	54	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	16.0	9.3	43	0	2.0	4.7	43	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Afr. Amer./Black	21.2	8.0	25	0	0.0	0.0	25	25
Hispanic/Latino	17.2	14.7	34	0	0.0	8.8	34	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	24.7	38.6	70	25	5.5	7.1	70	0
High needs	23.6	32.1	53	25	5.5	9.4	53	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	27.1	34.9	43	25	4.2	11.6	43	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Afr. Amer./Black	19.4	28.0	25	25	6.5	12.0	25	0
Hispanic/Latino	25.0	42.4	33	25	7.1	3.0	33	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	4.5	5.9	68	25	9.0	10.3	68	0
High needs	4.0	1.9	53	0	10.0	13.2	53	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	4.4	2.3	43	0	6.7	7.0	43	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Afr. Amer./Black	3.2	4.0	25	25	6.5	0.0	25	25
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	31	-	-	-	31	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		49.0	44.5	-4.5	51.0	No	62	50	Below Target
High needs		48.0	41.0	-7.0	51.0	No	48	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		48.5	46.0	-2.5	51.0	No	37	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		34.5	48.0	13.5	51.0	Yes	23	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		53.0	36.0	-17.0	51.0	No	29	25	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		46.0	58.0	12.0	51.0	No	61	75	On Target
High needs		50.5	55.0	4.5	51.0	No	47	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		51.0	59.0	8.0	51.0	No	37	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	17	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	17	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		39.0	59.0	20.0	51.0	No	23	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		54.0	54.0	0.0	51.0	No	29	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	58.0	60.0	44.00	0
High needs	58.0	60.0	44.00	0
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	44.00	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		70.0	71.4	1.4	80.0	90.0	84	25	No Change
High needs		71.3	72.5	1.2	80.0	90.0	80	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	9	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	15	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		61.4	73.1	11.7	80.0	90.0	26	50	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		77.8	73.3	-4.5	80.0	90.0	45	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	8	-	-

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		73.1	74.0	0.9	85.0	95.0	100	25	No Change
High needs		74.4	75.5	1.1	85.0	95.0	94	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	10	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	26	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		84.4	65.9	-18.5	85.0	95.0	44	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino		64.3	80.6	16.3	85.0	95.0	36	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	9	-	-

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		3.8	5.8	2.6	3.2	2.2	1.9	25	388	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		2.8	6.1	1.8	4.3	1.6	1.4	53	271	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		1.4	-	-	-	-	0.7	-	215	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	38	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	90	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	27	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		2.6	5.3	1.3	4.0	1.5	1.3	52	156	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		4.5	6.1	3.6	2.5	2.6	2.3	32	166	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	29	-	-

Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more) About the Data
	2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged	PPI Points
All students	-	-
High needs	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	76	76	100	Yes	76	75	99	Yes	76	71	94	No
High needs	58	58	100	Yes	58	57	98	Yes	58	55	95	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	46	46	100	Yes	46	46	100	Yes	46	44	96	Yes
EL and Former EL	21	-	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	21	-	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Asian	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	28	28	100	Yes	28	28	100	Yes	28	26	93	No
Hispanic/Latino	36	36	100	Yes	36	35	97	Yes	36	33	92	No
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.