Massachusetts School and District Profiles

New Mission High School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - New Mission High School

Organization Information

District:

Boston (00350000)

School type:

High School

School:

New Mission High School (00350542)

Grades served:

09,10,11,12

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		92.3	97.3	99.3	2.0	95.5	96.2	78	75	100	Above Target
High needs		92.2	96.2	98.9	2.7	95.5	96.1	92	45	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		96.7	96.7	98.7	2.0	97.0	98.4	85	38	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		89.8	98.0	99.5	1.5	94.1	94.9	96	54	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		92.0	94.7	94.7	0.0	95.3	96.0	64	76	75	On Target
High needs		91.3	93.3	93.5	0.2	94.9	95.7	93	46	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		94.6	94.6	94.9	0.3	95.1	97.3	91	39	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		89.2	93.6	95.4	1.8	93.7	94.6	98	54	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		76.5	84.4	87.1	2.7	86.3	88.3	28	62	75	On Target
High needs		76.1	82.7	84.8	2.1	86.1	88.1	54	33	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		82.7	82.7	85.7	3.0	84.1	91.4	54	28	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		70.0	80.8	86.3	5.5	82.5	85.0	79	42	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	30.7	25.3	75	0	0.0	0.0	75	25
High needs	26.9	24.4	45	0	0.0	0.0	45	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	30.4	26.3	38	0	0.0	0.0	38	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	25.5	29.6	54	25	0.0	0.0	54	25
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	48.0	48.7	76	0	1.3	0.0	76	25
High needs	42.3	45.7	46	0	1.9	0.0	46	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	47.8	43.6	39	0	2.2	0.0	39	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	47.1	50.0	54	0	2.0	0.0	54	25
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	9.1	1.6	62	0	2.6	0.0	62	25
High needs	9.1	3.0	33	0	3.6	0.0	33	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	10.2	3.6	28	0	4.1	0.0	28	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	11.5	2.4	42	0	3.8	0.0	42	25
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		43.0	62.0	19.0	51.0	Yes	68	100	Above Target
High needs		48.0	62.0	14.0	51.0	Yes	39	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		50.0	61.5	11.5	51.0	Yes	32	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		30.0	63.0	33.0	51.0	Yes	47	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		54.0	59.0	5.0	51.0	No	69	75	On Target
High needs		61.0	59.5	-1.5	51.0	No	40	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		60.0	57.0	-3.0	51.0	No	33	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		56.0	58.0	2.0	51.0	Yes	47	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	20	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	16.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	16.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	16.00	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		88.6	98.2	9.6	80.0	90.0	56	100	Above Target
High needs		87.3	98.0	10.7	80.0	90.0	49	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	9	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		95.5	100.0	4.5	80.0	90.0	40	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	15	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		92.9	91.4	-1.5	85.0	95.0	70	75	On Target
High needs		92.5	90.5	-2.0	85.0	95.0	63	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	7	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	11	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		90.7	97.7	7.0	85.0	95.0	44	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	20	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	4	-	-

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		1.6	1.4	1.0	0.4	0.9	0.8	52	301	25	No Change
High needs		1.4	1.2	1.2	0.0	0.8	0.7	63	165	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		0.7	-	-	-	-	0.4	-	136	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	42	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		1.8	1.1	0.0	1.1	1.1	0.9	82	189	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	94	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-

Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more) About the Data
	2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged	PPI Points
All students	1	0
High needs	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	78	77	99	Yes	78	78	100	Yes	78	78	100	Yes
High needs	46	45	98	Yes	46	46	100	Yes	46	46	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	39	38	97	Yes	39	39	100	Yes	39	39	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	14	-	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	56	56	100	Yes	56	56	100	Yes	56	56	100	Yes
Hispanic/Latino	20	-	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.