Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Mission Hill K-8 School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

This organization is currently closed.


2016 Accountability Data - Mission Hill School
Organization Information
District:Boston (00350000)School type:Elementary-Middle School
School:Mission Hill School (00350382)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 3
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 58.4, Target = 87.9CPI = 58.4, Target = 87.9CPI = 58.4, Target = 87.9 79.2 64.1 58.4 -5.7 87.9 89.6 4920Declined
High needsCPI = 45.7, Target = 81.4CPI = 45.7, Target = 81.4CPI = 45.7, Target = 81.4 68.1 58.3 45.7 -12.6 81.4 84.1 2640Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 42.6, Target = 59.8CPI = 42.6, Target = 59.8CPI = 42.6, Target = 59.8 56.1 56.1 42.6 -13.5 59.8 78.1 2470Declined
EL and Former EL -------15--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 51.4, Target = 72.3CPI = 51.4, Target = 72.3CPI = 51.4, Target = 72.3 52.5 50.7 51.4 0.7 72.3 76.3 183750Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------25--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 53.1, Target = 83.5CPI = 53.1, Target = 83.5CPI = 53.1, Target = 83.5 71.7 58.9 53.1 -5.8 83.5 85.9 1490Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------14--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 43.3, Target = 82.8CPI = 43.3, Target = 82.8CPI = 43.3, Target = 82.8 70.5 42.5 43.3 0.8 82.8 85.3 29050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 29, Target = 74.9CPI = 29, Target = 74.9CPI = 29, Target = 74.9 56.9 36.0 29.0 -7.0 74.9 78.5 2630Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 26.1, Target = 40.8CPI = 26.1, Target = 40.8CPI = 26.1, Target = 40.8 35.4 35.4 26.1 -9.3 40.8 67.7 1470Declined
EL and Former EL -------16--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 30.9, Target = 65CPI = 30.9, Target = 65CPI = 30.9, Target = 65 40.0 32.9 30.9 -2.0 65.0 70.0 43425No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------24--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 38.5, Target = 82.3CPI = 38.5, Target = 82.3CPI = 38.5, Target = 82.3 69.6 36.5 38.5 2.0 82.3 84.8 14850Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------14--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students -------16--
High needs -------9--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------8--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------2--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------3--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 5.7 9.89225 26.4 39.1920
High needs 1.6 0.0640 31.7 51.6640
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0470 37.8 53.2470
EL and Former EL--15---15-
Students w/ disabilities 2.9 0.0370 35.3 40.5370
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--25---25-
Hispanic/Latino 0.0 4.14925 31.1 49.0490
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--14---14-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 4.1 12.29025 55.7 57.8900
High needs 0.0 0.0630 64.4 76.2630
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0470 67.9 78.7470
EL and Former EL--16---16-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0340 68.3 76.5340
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--24---24-
Hispanic/Latino 2.1 12.54825 66.7 64.6480
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--14---14-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--16---16-
High needs--9---9-
Econ. Disadvantaged--8---8-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--2---2-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--3---3-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 52.0 34.0 -18.0 51.0No5625Below Target
High needsSGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51 52.5 31.0 -21.5 51.0No4425Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 17, Target = 51SGP = 17, Target = 51SGP = 17, Target = 51 44.5 17.0 -27.5 51.0No310Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-11--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51 48.0 46.5 -1.5 51.0No2450Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-17--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51 37.0 32.0 -5.0 51.0No2925Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-8--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 18, Target = 51SGP = 18, Target = 51SGP = 18, Target = 51 32.0 18.0 -14.0 51.0No600Below Target
High needsSGP = 17, Target = 51SGP = 17, Target = 51SGP = 17, Target = 51 23.0 17.0 -6.0 51.0No480Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 12, Target = 51SGP = 12, Target = 51SGP = 12, Target = 51 22.0 12.0 -10.0 51.0No350Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-12--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 26, Target = 51SGP = 26, Target = 51SGP = 26, Target = 51 32.0 26.0 -6.0 51.0No250Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-19--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 16.5, Target = 51SGP = 16.5, Target = 51SGP = 16.5, Target = 51 31.0 16.5 -14.5 51.0No300Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-8--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.017-
High needs- 60.017-
EL and Former EL- 60.017-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students1259778No1259781No34---
High needs906877No906983No23---
Econ. Disadvantaged685076No685284No19---
EL and Former EL23---23---6---
Students w/ disabilities534075No533881No11---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1---1---
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black302592No30---7---
Hispanic/Latino675278No675381No20---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.5---5-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White22---22---6---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles