Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Mason Elementary School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Samuel W Mason

Organization Information
District:Boston (00350000)School type:Elementary School
School:Samuel W Mason (00350304)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 3
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 65.5, Target = 87.5CPI = 65.5, Target = 87.5CPI = 65.5, Target = 87.5 78.6 69.3 65.5 -3.8 87.5 89.3 51000Declined
High needsCPI = 60.4, Target = 86.8CPI = 60.4, Target = 86.8CPI = 60.4, Target = 86.8 77.3 63.8 60.4 -3.4 86.8 88.7 5770Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 60.9, Target = 66.5CPI = 60.9, Target = 66.5CPI = 60.9, Target = 66.5 63.5 63.5 60.9 -2.6 66.5 81.8 5620Declined
EL and Former EL -------21--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 53.4, Target = 82.2CPI = 53.4, Target = 82.2CPI = 53.4, Target = 82.2 69.4 62.2 53.4 -8.8 82.2 84.7 21440Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 62.5, Target = 88CPI = 62.5, Target = 88CPI = 62.5, Target = 88 79.4 71.0 62.5 -8.5 88.0 89.7 13520Declined
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 67.6, Target = 85.4CPI = 67.6, Target = 85.4CPI = 67.6, Target = 85.4 75.0 66.9 67.6 0.7 85.4 87.5 283450Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------2--
White -------5--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 67.9, Target = 88.7CPI = 67.9, Target = 88.7CPI = 67.9, Target = 88.7 80.7 76.4 67.9 -8.5 88.7 90.4 7990Declined
High needsCPI = 61.2, Target = 88.2CPI = 61.2, Target = 88.2CPI = 61.2, Target = 88.2 79.7 70.6 61.2 -9.4 88.2 89.9 6760Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 61.7, Target = 72.6CPI = 61.7, Target = 72.6CPI = 61.7, Target = 72.6 70.1 70.1 61.7 -8.4 72.6 85.1 6620Declined
EL and Former EL -------21--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 50.6, Target = 84.9CPI = 50.6, Target = 84.9CPI = 50.6, Target = 84.9 74.1 67.3 50.6 -16.7 84.9 87.1 14430Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 71.6, Target = 90.9CPI = 71.6, Target = 90.9CPI = 71.6, Target = 90.9 84.4 77.7 71.6 -6.1 90.9 92.2 52510Declined
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 62.5, Target = 85.9CPI = 62.5, Target = 85.9CPI = 62.5, Target = 85.9 75.9 75.7 62.5 -13.2 85.9 88.0 14340Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------2--
White -------5--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 56.3, Target = 81.9CPI = 56.3, Target = 81.9CPI = 56.3, Target = 81.9 69.0 64.5 56.3 -8.2 81.9 84.5 10280Declined
High needsCPI = 50, Target = 79.1CPI = 50, Target = 79.1CPI = 50, Target = 79.1 64.1 57.0 50.0 -7.0 79.1 82.1 11220Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------14--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------1--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 4.8 5.01000 16.2 25.01000
High needs 1.3 2.67725 20.0 28.6770
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.6 3.26225 19.7 29.0620
EL and Former EL--21---21-
Students w/ disabilities 2.6 0.0440 17.9 36.4440
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black 3.6 3.8520 14.3 30.8520
Hispanic/Latino 2.9 5.93425 17.6 17.6340
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--2---2-
White--5---5-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 17.1 14.1990 15.2 22.2990
High needs 7.5 6.6760 18.8 27.6760
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.9 8.16225 18.0 27.4620
EL and Former EL--21---21-
Students w/ disabilities 5.1 2.3430 20.5 41.9430
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black 14.3 9.8510 14.3 15.7510
Hispanic/Latino 20.6 14.7340 14.7 32.4340
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--2---2-
White--5---5-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 9.7 3.6280 22.6 39.3280
High needs 8.0 0.0220 28.0 45.5220
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--14---14-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--1---1-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 41.5, Target = 51SGP = 41.5, Target = 51SGP = 41.5, Target = 51 39.0 41.5 2.5 51.0No5850Below Target
High needsSGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51 39.0 35.0 -4.0 51.0No4325Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 33.5, Target = 51SGP = 33.5, Target = 51SGP = 33.5, Target = 51 45.0 33.5 -11.5 51.0No3425Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-11--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./BlackSGP = 32.5, Target = 51SGP = 32.5, Target = 51SGP = 32.5, Target = 51 51.5 32.5 -19.0 51.0No3225Below Target
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
White --- 51.0----
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51 36.0 35.0 -1.0 51.0No5725Below Target
High needsSGP = 33.5, Target = 51SGP = 33.5, Target = 51SGP = 33.5, Target = 51 36.0 33.5 -2.5 51.0No4225Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 33.5, Target = 51SGP = 33.5, Target = 51SGP = 33.5, Target = 51 36.0 33.5 -2.5 51.0No3425Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-11--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./BlackSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 36.0 45.0 9.0 51.0No3150Below Target
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
White --- 51.0----
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 44.0 60.0320
High needs 44.0 60.0320
EL and Former EL- 60.032-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students106106100Yes10610599Yes2929100Yes
High needs8383100Yes838299Yes2323100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged6868100Yes6868100Yes18---
EL and Former EL24---24---7---
Students w/ disabilities4545100Yes454498Yes17---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian3---3-------
Afr. Amer./Black5353100Yes535298Yes14---
Hispanic/Latino3737100Yes3737100Yes12---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.6---6---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.2---2-------
White5---5---1---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles