Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Clap Elementary School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Roger Clap
Organization Information
District:Boston (00350000)School type:Elementary School
School:Roger Clap (00350298)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 69.8, Target = 81.6CPI = 69.8, Target = 81.6CPI = 69.8, Target = 81.6 68.5 75.8 69.8 -6.0 81.6 84.3 9580Declined
High needsCPI = 62.5, Target = 80.6CPI = 62.5, Target = 80.6CPI = 62.5, Target = 80.6 66.8 68.4 62.5 -5.9 80.6 83.4 7400Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 63.3, Target = 70.3CPI = 63.3, Target = 70.3CPI = 63.3, Target = 70.3 67.6 67.6 63.3 -4.3 70.3 83.8 8300Declined
EL and Former EL -------20--
Students w/ disabilities -------7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------13--
Hispanic/Latino  57.1---- 78.6-25--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------18--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 79.2, Target = 73.1CPI = 79.2, Target = 73.1CPI = 79.2, Target = 73.1 53.8 70.4 79.2 8.8 73.1 76.9 2559100Above Target
High needsCPI = 75, Target = 71.6CPI = 75, Target = 71.6CPI = 75, Target = 71.6 51.3 66.0 75.0 9.0 71.6 75.7 4641100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 76.6, Target = 68.6CPI = 76.6, Target = 68.6CPI = 76.6, Target = 68.6 65.7 65.7 76.6 10.9 68.6 82.9 5031100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------21--
Students w/ disabilities -------7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------13--
Hispanic/Latino  67.9---- 84.0-26--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------18--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students -------17--
High needs -------11--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------8--
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilities -------1--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------6--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 10.9 12.15825 15.6 13.85825
High needs 5.3 12.54025 21.1 20.0400
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.9 13.33025 20.6 20.0300
EL and Former EL--20---20-
Students w/ disabilities--7---7-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--13---13-
Hispanic/Latino--25---25-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--18---18-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 20.0 23.75925 21.5 15.35925
High needs 10.3 17.14125 25.6 19.54125
Econ. Disadvantaged 8.6 16.13125 25.7 16.13125
EL and Former EL--21---21-
Students w/ disabilities--7---7-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--13---13-
Hispanic/Latino--26---26-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--18---18-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--17---17-
High needs--11---11-
Econ. Disadvantaged--8---8-
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities--1---1-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--6---6-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 24, Target = 51SGP = 24, Target = 51SGP = 24, Target = 51 49.0 24.0 -25.0 51.0No300Below Target
High needs --- 51.0-18--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-13--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-3--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-13--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 41.5 61.0 19.5 51.0Yes32100Above Target
High needsSGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51 73.0 57.5 -15.5 51.0Yes2075On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-15--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-10--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-3--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-6--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-13--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 48.0 60.0270
High needs 48.0 60.0270
EL and Former EL- 60.027-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students666497Yes666598Yes19---
High needs474698Yes4747100Yes13---
Econ. Disadvantaged343397Yes3434100Yes9---
EL and Former EL24---24---6---
Students w/ disabilities8---8---1---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian3---3---1---
Afr. Amer./Black16---16---5---
Hispanic/Latino292793No292897Yes7---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.------------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White18---18---6---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles