Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Bates Elementary School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Phineas Bates

Organization Information

District:

Boston (00350000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Phineas Bates (00350278)

Grades served:

PK,K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		75.5	82.0	85.2	3.2	85.7	87.8	48	157	75	On Target
High needs		70.7	77.1	77.1	0.0	82.9	85.4	57	85	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		76.2	76.2	75.4	-0.8	78.2	88.1	43	65	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		69.4	75.0	75.8	0.8	82.2	84.7	69	33	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		65.9	79.4	84.7	5.3	80.1	83.0	87	54	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		71.8	77.8	78.2	0.4	83.6	85.9	74	54	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		94.0	93.3	94.4	1.1	96.5	97.0	87	31	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		69.7	75.9	78.2	2.3	82.3	84.9	22	157	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		64.0	68.9	72.9	4.0	79.0	82.0	36	85	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		70.2	70.2	71.5	1.3	72.7	85.1	30	65	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		67.9	66.1	72.7	6.6	81.3	84.0	47	33	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		56.7	71.1	74.5	3.4	74.7	78.4	63	54	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		67.3	70.7	74.5	3.8	80.9	83.7	52	54	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		91.0	89.4	87.9	-1.5	94.8	95.5	50	31	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		64.8	64.3	74.0	9.7	79.5	82.4	31	51	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		56.8	-	-	-	-	78.4	-	20	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		50.0	-	-	-	-	75.0	-	20	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	17.5	19.7	157	25	9.1	5.1	157	25
High needs	7.2	8.2	85	25	13.3	9.4	85	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	7.9	7.7	65	0	12.7	12.3	65	0
EL and Former EL	6.3	9.1	33	25	15.6	12.1	33	25
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Afr. Amer./Black	3.9	9.3	54	25	7.8	5.6	54	25
Hispanic/Latino	15.1	20.4	54	25	15.1	9.3	54	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	38.5	35.5	31	0	0.0	0.0	31	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	22.5	33.8	157	25	14.8	12.7	157	25
High needs	8.5	18.8	85	25	23.2	20.0	85	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	9.7	15.4	65	25	19.4	23.1	65	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	21.2	33	25	22.6	18.2	33	25
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Afr. Amer./Black	9.8	18.5	54	25	13.7	16.7	54	0
Hispanic/Latino	15.4	35.2	54	25	23.1	14.8	54	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	57.7	51.6	31	0	3.8	3.2	31	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	14.3	25.5	51	25	31.0	11.8	51	25
High needs	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		68.0	45.0	-23.0	51.0	No	106	50	Below Target
High needs		64.0	45.0	-19.0	51.0	No	52	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		63.5	46.0	-17.5	51.0	No	40	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		62.5	40.0	-22.5	51.0	No	33	25	Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		66.0	47.0	-19.0	51.0	No	37	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	24	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		64.0	31.5	-32.5	51.0	No	106	25	Below Target
High needs		62.0	28.0	-34.0	51.0	No	52	0	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		63.5	24.0	-39.5	51.0	No	40	0	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		63.5	28.0	-35.5	51.0	Yes	33	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		55.0	38.0	-17.0	51.0	No	37	25	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	24	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	36.5	60.0	52.00	0
High needs	36.5	60.0	52.00	0
EL and Former EL	36.5	60.0	52.00	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	159	159	100	Yes	159	159	100	Yes	51	51	100	Yes
High needs	86	86	100	Yes	86	86	100	Yes	20	20	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	66	66	100	Yes	66	66	100	Yes	15	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	33	33	100	Yes	33	33	100	Yes	7	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	17	-	-	-	17	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	7	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	54	54	100	Yes	54	54	100	Yes	20	20	100	Yes
Hispanic/Latino	55	55	100	Yes	55	55	100	Yes	16	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	11	-	-	-	11	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	31	31	100	Yes	31	31	100	Yes	11	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.