Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Otis Elementary School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - James Otis

Organization Information

District:

Boston (00350000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

James Otis (00350156)

Grades served:

PK,K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		73.9	61.2	73.7	12.5	84.8	87.0	13	171	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		73.5	61.4	73.3	11.9	84.5	86.8	38	158	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		60.4	60.4	75.8	15.4	63.7	80.2	46	92	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		72.4	57.8	71.0	13.2	83.9	86.2	52	131	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	22	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		75.4	59.5	73.3	13.8	85.7	87.7	55	144	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		79.5	75.8	86.7	10.9	88.0	89.8	54	169	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		79.2	75.7	86.2	10.5	87.9	89.6	89	156	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		75.0	75.0	87.4	12.4	77.1	87.5	91	91	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		80.9	75.5	86.6	11.1	88.9	90.5	84	129	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		80.6	75.0	86.8	11.8	88.7	90.3	92	142	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		53.1	42.9	50.5	7.6	72.6	76.6	6	51	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		52.1	42.6	48.3	5.7	72.1	76.1	9	45	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		42.6	42.6	49.1	6.5	47.4	71.3	16	29	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		49.4	39.2	46.1	6.9	70.5	74.7	26	32	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		55.0	35.9	49.4	13.5	73.8	77.5	24	40	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	2.7	1.8	171	0	28.2	13.5	171	25
High needs	2.2	1.3	158	0	28.3	13.9	158	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	1.1	1.1	92	0	29.2	9.8	92	25
EL and Former EL	2.8	1.5	131	0	33.0	15.3	131	25
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	22	-	-	-	22	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Hispanic/Latino	2.3	1.4	144	0	29.5	12.5	144	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	14.8	30.8	169	25	11.4	6.5	169	25
High needs	14.5	28.8	156	25	11.6	6.4	156	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	12.4	29.7	91	25	10.1	4.4	91	25
EL and Former EL	16.5	30.2	129	25	11.9	5.4	129	25
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Hispanic/Latino	14.0	30.3	142	25	11.6	4.9	142	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	0.0	2.0	51	25	61.5	35.3	51	25
High needs	0.0	0.0	45	0	62.2	35.6	45	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	0.0	29	0	59.3	37.9	29	25
EL and Former EL	0.0	0.0	32	0	70.0	40.6	32	25
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	2.5	40	25	68.8	35.0	40	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		39.5	55.5	16.0	51.0	Yes	100	100	Above Target
High needs		40.0	55.0	15.0	51.0	Yes	91	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		37.0	56.0	19.0	51.0	Yes	62	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		40.5	56.0	15.5	51.0	Yes	71	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		37.0	58.5	21.5	51.0	Yes	86	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		61.0	81.0	20.0	51.0	Yes	100	100	Above Target
High needs		60.5	81.0	20.5	51.0	Yes	91	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		61.0	79.0	18.0	51.0	Yes	63	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		64.0	86.0	22.0	51.0	Yes	71	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		61.5	83.0	21.5	51.0	Yes	86	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	34.0	60.0	188.00	0
High needs	34.0	60.0	188.00	0
EL and Former EL	34.0	60.0	188.00	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	174	174	100	Yes	174	172	99	Yes	53	52	98	Yes
High needs	160	160	100	Yes	160	158	99	Yes	47	46	98	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	93	93	100	Yes	93	92	99	Yes	30	30	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	132	132	100	Yes	132	130	98	Yes	34	33	97	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	23	-	-	-	23	-	-	-	10	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	146	146	100	Yes	146	144	99	Yes	42	41	98	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
White	21	-	-	-	21	-	-	-	6	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.