Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Chittick Elementary School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - James J Chittick
Organization Information
District:Boston (00350000)School type:Elementary School
School:James J Chittick (00350154)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 3
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 76.1, Target = 81.7CPI = 76.1, Target = 81.7CPI = 76.1, Target = 81.7 68.7 68.8 76.1 7.3 81.7 84.4 1811450Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 72.4, Target = 81.3CPI = 72.4, Target = 81.3CPI = 72.4, Target = 81.3 67.9 65.1 72.4 7.3 81.3 84.0 348850Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 73.4, Target = 70.3CPI = 73.4, Target = 70.3CPI = 73.4, Target = 70.3 67.6 67.6 73.4 5.8 70.3 83.8 3376100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------17--
Students w/ disabilities  57.5---- 78.8-29--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 76.6, Target = 82.8CPI = 76.6, Target = 82.8CPI = 76.6, Target = 82.8 70.5 71.7 76.6 4.9 82.8 85.3 587850Improved Below Target
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 75, Target = 76.9CPI = 75, Target = 76.9CPI = 75, Target = 76.9 60.4 66.4 75.0 8.6 76.9 80.2 612850Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------2--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 65.6, Target = 80.4CPI = 65.6, Target = 80.4CPI = 65.6, Target = 80.4 66.4 67.5 65.6 -1.9 80.4 83.2 411425No Change
High needsCPI = 65.1, Target = 79.9CPI = 65.1, Target = 79.9CPI = 65.1, Target = 79.9 65.6 67.2 65.1 -2.1 79.9 82.8 138825No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 63.2, Target = 68.1CPI = 63.2, Target = 68.1CPI = 63.2, Target = 68.1 65.2 65.2 63.2 -2.0 68.1 82.6 87625No Change
EL and Former EL -------17--
Students w/ disabilities  56.7---- 78.4-29--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 63.8, Target = 79.7CPI = 63.8, Target = 79.7CPI = 63.8, Target = 79.7 65.2 68.5 63.8 -4.7 79.7 82.6 18780Declined
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 65.2, Target = 81.8CPI = 65.2, Target = 81.8CPI = 65.2, Target = 81.8 68.8 65.2 65.2 0.0 81.8 84.4 222825No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------2--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 40.5, Target = 74.1CPI = 40.5, Target = 74.1CPI = 40.5, Target = 74.1 55.6 50.0 40.5 -9.5 74.1 77.8 1290Declined
High needs -------19--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------16--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------18--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 1.0 2.611425 17.1 9.611425
High needs 1.3 1.1880 21.8 11.48825
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.6 1.3760 17.2 10.57625
EL and Former EL--17---17-
Students w/ disabilities--29---29-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black 1.4 3.87825 14.5 10.37825
Hispanic/Latino 0.0 0.0280 20.7 10.72825
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--2---2-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 3.8 6.111425 15.4 28.91140
High needs 3.9 1.1880 16.9 29.5880
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.6 1.3760 18.8 32.9760
EL and Former EL--17---17-
Students w/ disabilities--29---29-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black 2.9 7.77825 13.0 30.8780
Hispanic/Latino 3.6 3.6280 21.4 32.1280
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--2---2-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 0.0 0.0290 33.3 62.1290
High needs--19---19-
Econ. Disadvantaged--16---16-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--7---7-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--18---18-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51 61.0 36.0 -25.0 51.0Yes5575On Target
High needsSGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51 61.5 32.0 -29.5 51.0No4125Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 31.5, Target = 51SGP = 31.5, Target = 51SGP = 31.5, Target = 51 59.0 31.5 -27.5 51.0No3425Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-9--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./BlackSGP = 31.5, Target = 51SGP = 31.5, Target = 51SGP = 31.5, Target = 51 71.0 31.5 -39.5 51.0Yes3675On Target
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0----
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 26, Target = 51SGP = 26, Target = 51SGP = 26, Target = 51 42.0 26.0 -16.0 51.0Yes5575On Target
High needsSGP = 26, Target = 51SGP = 26, Target = 51SGP = 26, Target = 51 41.0 26.0 -15.0 51.0No410Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 22, Target = 51SGP = 22, Target = 51SGP = 22, Target = 51 39.5 22.0 -17.5 51.0No340Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-9--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./BlackSGP = 24.5, Target = 51SGP = 24.5, Target = 51SGP = 24.5, Target = 51 44.0 24.5 -19.5 51.0No360Below Target
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0----
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.013-
High needs- 60.013-
EL and Former EL- 60.013-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students11811799Yes11711699Yes323197Yes
High needs929199Yes919099Yes22---
Econ. Disadvantaged807999Yes797899Yes19---
EL and Former EL18---17---4---
Students w/ disabilities323197Yes313097Yes9---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---1-------
Afr. Amer./Black818099Yes818099Yes20---
Hispanic/Latino2929100Yes2828100Yes11---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.5---5---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White2---2-------

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles