Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Grew Elementary School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Henry Grew
Organization Information
District:Boston (00350000)School type:Elementary School
School:Henry Grew (00350135)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 4
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80.6, Target = 78.4CPI = 80.6, Target = 78.4CPI = 80.6, Target = 78.4 63.0 69.6 80.6 11.0 78.4 81.5 2999100Above Target
High needsCPI = 79.5, Target = 78.4CPI = 79.5, Target = 78.4CPI = 79.5, Target = 78.4 63.0 67.6 79.5 11.9 78.4 81.5 687275On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 79.5, Target = 70.2CPI = 79.5, Target = 70.2CPI = 79.5, Target = 70.2 67.5 67.5 79.5 12.0 70.2 83.8 6366100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------14--
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 75.5, Target = 78.8CPI = 75.5, Target = 78.8CPI = 75.5, Target = 78.8 63.6 71.5 75.5 4.0 78.8 81.8 555250Improved Below Target
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 85.3, Target = 78.1CPI = 85.3, Target = 78.1CPI = 85.3, Target = 78.1 62.5 63.8 85.3 21.5 78.1 81.3 9139100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------3--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 76.8, Target = 78.5CPI = 76.8, Target = 78.5CPI = 76.8, Target = 78.5 63.2 72.4 76.8 4.4 78.5 81.6 1910050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 76, Target = 78.8CPI = 76, Target = 78.8CPI = 76, Target = 78.8 63.7 73.6 76.0 2.4 78.8 81.9 517350Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 76.5, Target = 76CPI = 76.5, Target = 76 73.8 73.8 76.5 2.7 76.0 86.9 496775On Target
EL and Former EL -------14--
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 73.6, Target = 77.5CPI = 73.6, Target = 77.5CPI = 73.6, Target = 77.5 61.4 73.5 73.6 0.1 77.5 80.7 575350Improved Below Target
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 78.8, Target = 80.2CPI = 78.8, Target = 80.2CPI = 78.8, Target = 80.2 66.1 67.8 78.8 11.0 80.2 83.1 713950Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------3--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 56.3, Target = 75.4CPI = 56.3, Target = 75.4CPI = 56.3, Target = 75.4 57.8 40.0 56.3 16.3 75.4 78.9 102450Improved Below Target
High needs -------19--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------2--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------15--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------1--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 3.1 4.09925 16.5 5.19925
High needs 2.8 2.8720 21.1 6.97225
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.7 1.5660 18.3 6.16625
EL and Former EL--14---14-
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black 0.0 3.85225 16.0 5.85225
Hispanic/Latino 2.6 0.0390 21.1 5.13925
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--3---3-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 8.2 16.010025 16.5 14.010025
High needs 8.5 19.27325 19.7 15.17325
Econ. Disadvantaged 8.3 19.46725 18.3 13.46725
EL and Former EL--14---14-
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black 6.0 11.35325 14.0 15.1530
Hispanic/Latino 7.9 23.13925 21.1 12.83925
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--3---3-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 0.0 0.0240 63.3 25.02425
High needs--19---19-
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--2---2-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--15---15-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--1---1-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 60.5, Target = 51SGP = 60.5, Target = 51SGP = 60.5, Target = 51 34.5 60.5 26.0 51.0Yes50100Above Target
High needsSGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51 34.5 68.0 33.5 51.0Yes35100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 70.5, Target = 51SGP = 70.5, Target = 51SGP = 70.5, Target = 51 34.5 70.5 36.0 51.0Yes30100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./BlackSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 34.5 59.0 24.5 51.0No27100Above Target
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-2--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 59.0 43.0 -16.0 51.0Yes5075On Target
High needsSGP = 30, Target = 51SGP = 30, Target = 51SGP = 30, Target = 51 61.5 30.0 -31.5 51.0No360Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51 61.5 28.0 -33.5 51.0No310Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./BlackSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 60.5 52.0 -8.5 51.0No2875On Target
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-2--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 51.5 60.0260
High needs 51.5 60.0260
EL and Former EL- 60.026-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students11411399Yes114114100Yes2626100Yes
High needs848399Yes8484100Yes21---
Econ. Disadvantaged767599Yes7676100Yes18---
EL and Former EL19---19---4---
Students w/ disabilities10---10---2---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---1-------
Afr. Amer./Black636298Yes6363100Yes16---
Hispanic/Latino4343100Yes4343100Yes9---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.4---4-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White3---3---1---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles