Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Frederick J Dutile

District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Frederick J Dutile

Organization Information
District:Billerica (00310000)School type:Elementary School
School:Frederick J Dutile (00310007)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.7, Target = 92.5 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 83.7, Target = 92.5 75 or Higher All Students 87.1 87.0 83.7 -3.3 92.5 93.6 401500Declined
High needsCPI = 66.8, Target = 84.1 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 66.8, Target = 84.1 75 or Higher High needs 72.8 78.5 66.8 -11.7 84.1 86.4 15490Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------24--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 54.4, Target = 81.6 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 54.4, Target = 81.6 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 68.5 70.2 54.4 -15.8 81.6 84.3 23340Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 83.1, Target = 92.4 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 83.1, Target = 92.4 75 or Higher White 86.9 86.8 83.1 -3.7 92.4 93.5 231330Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.7, Target = 90.8 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 92.7, Target = 90.8CPI = 92.7, Target = 90.875 or Higher All Students 84.3 90.6 92.7 2.1 90.8 92.2 83150100Above Target
High needsCPI = 86.7, Target = 85.4 - High needsHigh needs-CPI = 86.7, Target = 85.4CPI = 86.7, Target = 85.475 or Higher High needs 75.0 85.5 86.7 1.2 85.4 87.5 9049100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------24--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 85.3, Target = 85.1 - Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities-CPI = 85.3, Target = 85.175 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 74.4 80.8 85.3 4.5 85.1 87.2 963475On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 92.1, Target = 91.4 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 92.1, Target = 91.475 or Higher White 85.2 90.4 92.1 1.7 91.4 92.6 7613375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 79, Target = 91.3 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 79, Target = 91.3 75 or Higher All Students 85.0 81.7 79.0 -2.7 91.3 92.5 44440Declined
High needs -------12--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------6--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 76.9, Target = 91.7 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 76.9, Target = 91.7 75 or Higher White 85.7 83.1 76.9 -6.2 91.7 92.9 19390Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 15.3 16.01500 2.8 8.71500
High needs 4.0 8.24925 4.0 24.5490
Econ. Disadvantaged--24---24-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 5.93425 7.7 35.3340
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 17.3 15.01330 3.1 8.31330
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 37.5 42.015025 2.1 1.315025
High needs 24.0 28.64925 4.0 2.04925
Econ. Disadvantaged--24---24-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 15.4 17.63425 3.8 2.93425
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 38.6 41.41330 2.4 1.513325
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 14.6 9.1440 2.4 6.8440
High needs--12---12-
Econ. Disadvantaged--6---6-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--9---9-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 16.2 7.7390 2.7 7.7390
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 47, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 47, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 66.0 47.0 -19.0 51.0No9850Below Target
High needsSGP = 43, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 43, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 58.0 43.0 -15.0 51.0No3150Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-15--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 45, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 45, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 69.0 45.0 -24.0 51.0No8850Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 47, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 47, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 70.0 47.0 -23.0 51.0Yes9875On Target
High needsSGP = 49, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 49, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 59.0 49.0 -10.0 51.0No3150Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-15--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 42.5, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 42.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 69.5 42.5 -27.0 51.0Yes8875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.02.00-
High needs- 60.02.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.02.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students15515197Yes15515197Yes454498Yes
High needs524997Yes524997Yes13---
Econ. Disadvantaged24---24---7---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities373495Yes373495Yes9---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian6---6---3---
Afr. Amer./Black3---3-------
Hispanic/Latino4---4---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.4---4---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1---1---
White13713498Yes13713498Yes3939100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles