Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Joseph F DiPietro Elementary School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - South Elementary

Organization Information

District:

Bellingham (00250000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

South Elementary (00250020)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		88.5	78.3	89.4	11.1	93.3	94.3	58	94	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		79.6	64.1	87.0	22.9	88.1	89.8	92	23	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		87.8	77.7	90.2	12.5	92.9	93.9	55	84	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		88.0	81.1	92.3	11.2	93.0	94.0	61	94	75	On Target
High needs		76.7	66.4	81.5	15.1	86.4	88.4	58	23	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		87.6	82.0	93.5	11.5	92.8	93.8	56	84	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	7.7	7.4	94	0	7.7	1.1	94	25
High needs	5.5	0.0	23	0	20.0	4.3	23	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	7.9	7.1	84	0	8.5	0.0	84	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	19.1	48.9	94	25	8.2	5.3	94	25
High needs	12.7	39.1	23	25	21.8	17.4	23	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	19.4	47.6	84	25	7.3	3.6	84	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
High needs		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
High needs		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	2.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	2.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	2.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	97	95	98	Yes	97	95	98	Yes	-	-	-	-
High needs	23	23	100	Yes	23	23	100	Yes	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	15	-	-	-	15	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	9	-	-	-	9	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	7	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	87	85	98	Yes	87	85	98	Yes	-	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.