Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Belchertown High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Belchertown High

Organization Information
District:Belchertown (00240000)School type:High School
School:Belchertown High (00240505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:Pioneer ValleyTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 99.5, Target = 99.1CPI = 99.5, Target = 99.1 98.4 99.6 99.5 -0.1 99.1 99.2 84163100Above Target
High needsCPI = 97.7, Target = 94.3CPI = 97.7, Target = 94.3CPI = 97.7, Target = 94.3 90.2 98.1 97.7 -0.4 94.3 95.1 7833100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 99.7, Target = 99.1CPI = 99.7, Target = 99.1 98.5 99.7 99.7 0.0 99.1 99.3 81152100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.8, Target = 98.1CPI = 95.8, Target = 98.1CPI = 95.8, Target = 98.1 96.8 97.6 95.8 -1.8 98.1 98.4 7416225No Change
High needsCPI = 82.6, Target = 91.3CPI = 82.6, Target = 91.3CPI = 82.6, Target = 91.3 85.0 91.2 82.6 -8.6 91.3 92.5 51330Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 96, Target = 98.5CPI = 96, Target = 98.5CPI = 96, Target = 98.5 97.5 98.2 96.0 -2.2 98.5 98.8 6515125No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 96.9, Target = 97.3CPI = 96.9, Target = 97.3 95.3 97.6 96.9 -0.7 97.3 97.7 8216175On Target
High needsCPI = 88.3, Target = 88.2CPI = 88.3, Target = 88.2 79.8 92.8 88.3 -4.5 88.2 89.9 743275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 97, Target = 97.4CPI = 97, Target = 97.4 95.5 98.6 97.0 -1.6 97.4 97.8 7615075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 62.7 68.11630 0.0 0.016325
High needs 33.3 36.4330 0.0 0.03325
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--18---18-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 64.7 68.41520 0.0 0.015225
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 62.9 69.11620 0.6 2.51620
High needs 43.2 39.4330 2.7 12.1330
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--18---18-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 65.1 69.51510 0.7 2.01510
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 38.4 55.916125 0.0 0.61610
High needs 13.2 28.13225 0.0 3.1320
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--18---18-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 38.1 55.315025 0.0 0.71500
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 71, Target = 51SGP = 71, Target = 51SGP = 71, Target = 51 66.0 71.0 5.0 51.0No157100Above Target
High needsSGP = 48.5, Target = 51SGP = 48.5, Target = 51SGP = 48.5, Target = 51 61.0 48.5 -12.5 51.0No3250Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-17--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 73, Target = 51SGP = 73, Target = 51SGP = 73, Target = 51 65.0 73.0 8.0 51.0No147100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51 70.0 67.0 -3.0 51.0No157100Above Target
High needsSGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51 70.0 53.5 -16.5 51.0No3275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-17--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 67.5, Target = 51SGP = 67.5, Target = 51SGP = 67.5, Target = 51 70.0 67.5 -2.5 51.0No146100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 93.9, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.9, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.9, Target = 80 96.0 93.9 -2.1 80.0 90.018075On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 83.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 83.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 83.7, Target = 80 87.9 83.7 -4.2 80.0 90.04975On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.015--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.02--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.03--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.01--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.04--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 93.5, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.5, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.5, Target = 80 95.5 93.5 -2.0 80.0 90.017075On Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 96, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 96, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 96, Target = 85 95.0 96.0 1.0 85.0 95.0200100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 87.9, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 87.9, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 87.9, Target = 85 89.1 87.9 -1.2 85.0 95.05875On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.030--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.05--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.02--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.010--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.06--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 95.5, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.5, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.5, Target = 85 95.1 95.5 0.4 85.0 95.0177100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 0.7, Target = 0.9 1.6 0.9 0.7 0.2 0.9 0.86270875On Target
High needsDropout Rate = 3, Target = 1.8 3.1 1.8 3.0 -1.2 1.8 1.6351350Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------79--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------74--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------15--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteDropout Rate = 0.8, Target = 0.9 1.6 1.0 0.8 0.2 0.9 0.84964775On Target
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students170170100Yes17016999Yes170170100Yes
High needs3838100Yes3838100Yes3838100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged21---21---21---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities20---20---20---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1---1---
Asian2---2---2---
Afr. Amer./Black5---5---5---
Hispanic/Latino3---3---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1---1---
White156156100Yes15615599Yes156156100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles