Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Lt Job Lane School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Lt Job Lane School

Organization Information

District:

Bedford (00230000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Lt Job Lane School (00230012)

Grades served:

03,04,05

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Title I School (TA)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		92.4	93.8	92.5	-1.3	95.6	96.2	82	518	75	On Target
High needs		81.4	84.7	82.2	-2.5	89.2	90.7	79	171	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		84.7	84.7	75.6	-9.1	86.0	92.4	44	42	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		83.0	88.3	85.1	-3.2	88.7	91.5	89	69	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		75.3	78.8	77.3	-1.5	85.6	87.7	83	96	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		96.0	98.4	96.9	-1.5	97.7	98.0	81	73	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		82.9	73.3	67.2	-6.1	90.0	91.5	24	29	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino		89.4	89.7	80.6	-9.1	93.8	94.7	82	31	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		93.0	94.8	94.7	-0.1	95.9	96.5	89	370	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		91.1	92.1	92.9	0.8	94.8	95.6	84	518	75	On Target
High needs		81.4	83.6	84.8	1.2	89.2	90.7	86	171	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		79.2	79.2	79.2	0.0	80.9	89.6	63	42	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		82.0	88.8	90.6	1.8	88.0	91.0	91	69	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		75.7	76.6	79.4	2.8	85.8	87.9	87	96	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		96.4	99.0	99.0	0.0	97.9	98.2	87	73	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		81.4	75.0	78.4	3.4	89.2	90.7	74	29	50	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		88.5	86.2	82.3	-3.9	93.3	94.3	80	31	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		91.2	92.3	93.7	1.4	94.9	95.6	83	370	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		85.8	88.9	85.3	-3.6	91.7	92.9	65	173	0	Declined
High needs		70.9	80.5	70.3	-10.2	83.0	85.5	59	53	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		72.5	77.4	74.1	-3.3	84.0	86.3	84	27	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		89.8	93.6	89.8	-3.8	94.1	94.9	27	27	75	On Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		86.8	89.2	87.1	-2.1	92.3	93.4	61	122	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	34.9	28.8	518	0	1.7	3.1	518	0
High needs	12.5	8.8	171	0	5.4	8.2	171	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	13.0	7.1	42	0	3.7	11.9	42	0
EL and Former EL	13.3	11.6	69	0	5.0	8.7	69	0
Students w/ disabilities	6.5	5.2	96	0	7.6	11.5	96	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	60.3	39.7	73	0	0.0	1.4	73	0
Afr. Amer./Black	6.7	3.4	29	0	10.0	20.7	29	0
Hispanic/Latino	10.3	19.4	31	25	0.0	16.1	31	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	33.2	29.5	370	0	1.6	1.1	370	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	49.1	54.1	518	25	3.8	3.5	518	0
High needs	26.8	29.8	171	25	10.7	9.4	171	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	16.7	9.5	42	0	14.8	9.5	42	25
EL and Former EL	38.3	37.7	69	0	6.7	4.3	69	25
Students w/ disabilities	19.6	22.9	96	25	18.5	14.6	96	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	80.8	74.0	73	0	0.0	1.4	73	0
Afr. Amer./Black	20.0	10.3	29	0	20.0	10.3	29	25
Hispanic/Latino	17.2	29.0	31	25	3.4	9.7	31	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	46.5	55.7	370	25	3.3	2.7	370	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	22.1	27.7	173	25	2.0	6.4	173	0
High needs	2.0	11.3	53	25	4.0	18.9	53	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	14.8	27	25	3.2	18.5	27	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	28.6	44.4	27	25	0.0	3.7	27	0
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	21.3	28.7	122	25	1.4	4.1	122	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		74.0	55.5	-18.5	51.0	No	326	75	On Target
High needs		69.5	50.5	-19.0	51.0	No	108	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		64.0	36.0	-28.0	51.0	No	29	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		68.0	52.0	-16.0	51.0	No	41	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		73.0	53.0	-20.0	51.0	No	64	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		80.0	56.0	-24.0	51.0	No	44	75	On Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	17	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	22	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		73.5	57.0	-16.5	51.0	No	229	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		57.0	39.0	-18.0	51.0	Yes	327	75	On Target
High needs		47.0	35.0	-12.0	51.0	No	108	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		52.0	32.0	-20.0	51.0	No	29	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		48.0	35.0	-13.0	51.0	No	41	25	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		53.0	32.5	-20.5	51.0	Yes	64	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		73.0	47.0	-26.0	51.0	Yes	44	75	On Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	17	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	22	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		52.0	38.5	-13.5	51.0	Yes	230	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	59.0	60.0	43.00	0
High needs	59.0	60.0	43.00	0
EL and Former EL	59.0	60.0	43.00	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	535	533	100	Yes	535	533	100	Yes	177	176	99	Yes
High needs	182	181	99	Yes	182	181	99	Yes	55	55	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	48	47	98	Yes	48	47	98	Yes	15	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	73	73	100	Yes	73	73	100	Yes	24	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	99	99	100	Yes	99	99	100	Yes	27	27	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	77	77	100	Yes	77	77	100	Yes	27	27	100	Yes
Afr. Amer./Black	31	31	100	Yes	31	31	100	Yes	9	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	34	34	100	Yes	34	34	100	Yes	13	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	15	-	-	-	15	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	378	376	99	Yes	378	376	99	Yes	124	123	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.