Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Auburn Senior High
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Auburn Senior High
Organization Information
District:Auburn (00170000)School type:High School
School:Auburn Senior High (00170505)Grades served:PK,09,10,11,12
Region:CentralTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 97.5, Target = 97.8CPI = 97.5, Target = 97.8 96.3 99.2 97.5 -1.7 97.8 98.2 41167100Above Target
High needsCPI = 92.5, Target = 93CPI = 92.5, Target = 93 88.0 95.7 92.5 -3.2 93.0 94.0 324075On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged  100.0---- 100.0-27--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 97.6, Target = 98.4CPI = 97.6, Target = 98.4 97.2 99.6 97.6 -2.0 98.4 98.6 25144100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.6, Target = 95.6CPI = 90.6, Target = 95.6CPI = 90.6, Target = 95.6 92.5 97.9 90.6 -7.3 95.6 96.3 391650Declined
High needsCPI = 75, Target = 87.3CPI = 75, Target = 87.3CPI = 75, Target = 87.3 78.3 94.0 75.0 -19.0 87.3 89.2 18390Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged  94.8---- 97.4-27--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.7, Target = 96.2CPI = 91.7, Target = 96.2CPI = 91.7, Target = 96.2 93.4 97.8 91.7 -6.1 96.2 96.7 311410Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.7, Target = 95.5CPI = 91.7, Target = 95.5CPI = 91.7, Target = 95.5 92.3 95.1 91.7 -3.4 95.5 96.2 461560Declined
High needsCPI = 79.1, Target = 88CPI = 79.1, Target = 88CPI = 79.1, Target = 88 79.4 92.0 79.1 -12.9 88.0 89.7 30370Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged  98.8---- 99.4-25--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.5, Target = 96.2CPI = 91.5, Target = 96.2CPI = 91.5, Target = 96.2 93.4 95.2 91.5 -3.7 96.2 96.7 311330Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 56.5 44.91670 0.6 1.21670
High needs 24.1 20.0400 3.4 2.54025
Econ. Disadvantaged--27---27-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 58.1 45.11440 0.0 1.41440
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 52.9 44.81650 0.7 3.61650
High needs 31.0 15.4390 3.4 15.4390
Econ. Disadvantaged--27---27-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--15---15-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 51.1 44.71410 0.7 2.81410
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 32.6 20.51560 0.7 0.015625
High needs 8.0 2.7370 4.0 0.03725
Econ. Disadvantaged--25---25-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--14---14-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 32.5 19.51330 0.0 0.013325
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 44.5 42.0 -2.5 51.0No16150Below Target
High needsSGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51 33.0 33.0 0.0 51.0No3725Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-25--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 40.5, Target = 51SGP = 40.5, Target = 51SGP = 40.5, Target = 51 49.0 40.5 -8.5 51.0No14050Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 27, Target = 51SGP = 27, Target = 51SGP = 27, Target = 51 41.0 27.0 -14.0 51.0No1590Below Target
High needsSGP = 27, Target = 51SGP = 27, Target = 51SGP = 27, Target = 51 32.0 27.0 -5.0 51.0No350Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-24--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 27, Target = 51SGP = 27, Target = 51SGP = 27, Target = 51 41.0 27.0 -14.0 51.0No1370Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.07-
High needs- 60.07-
EL and Former EL- 60.07-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 91.8, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.8, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.8, Target = 80 90.9 91.8 0.9 80.0 90.017075On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 83.9, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 83.9, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 83.9, Target = 80 81.0 83.9 2.9 80.0 90.06275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.024--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.01--
Asian --- 80.0 90.01--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.01--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.09--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.05--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 91.5, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.5, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.5, Target = 80 90.9 91.5 0.6 80.0 90.015375On Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 92, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 92, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 92, Target = 85 94.7 92.0 -2.7 85.0 95.017575On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 82.5, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 82.5, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 82.5, Target = 85 86.7 82.5 -4.2 85.0 95.0630Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.01--
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.022--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.04--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.06--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 92.1, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.1, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.1, Target = 85 95.3 92.1 -3.2 85.0 95.016575On Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 0.8, Target = 0.4 0.7 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.45865225No Change
High needsDropout Rate = 3.2, Target = 1.3 2.3 2.7 3.2 -0.5 1.3 1.23412525No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged  4.1---- 2.1-73--
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilities -------56--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------3--
Asian -------15--
Afr. Amer./Black -------10--
Hispanic/Latino -------38--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 0.9, Target = 0.4 0.6 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.34457125No Change
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students16916899Yes16916698Yes16916899Yes
High needs4141100Yes414098Yes4141100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged2727100Yes2727100Yes2727100Yes
EL and Former EL4---4---4---
Students w/ disabilities17---17---17---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian5---5---5---
Afr. Amer./Black5---5---5---
Hispanic/Latino11---11---11---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White145145100Yes14514298Yes14514499Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles