Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Robert J. Coelho Middle School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Robert J. Coelho Middle School

Organization Information

District:

Attleboro (00160000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Robert J. Coelho Middle School (00160305)

Grades served:

05,06,07,08

Region:

Southeast

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		87.9	91.8	91.9	0.1	92.9	94.0	58	661	75	On Target
High needs		77.4	81.3	81.7	0.4	86.8	88.7	59	227	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		85.3	85.3	86.2	0.9	86.5	92.7	65	123	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		73.8	76.6	76.6	0.0	84.7	86.9	61	32	25	No Change
Students w/ disabilities		68.4	70.8	73.0	2.2	81.6	84.2	61	126	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		84.8	84.0	87.5	3.5	91.1	92.4	75	56	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		92.4	-	-	-	-	96.2	-	29	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		88.1	93.0	92.5	-0.5	93.1	94.1	52	530	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		82.6	86.2	85.5	-0.7	89.9	91.3	72	661	25	No Change
High needs		69.1	72.0	69.6	-2.4	82.0	84.6	78	226	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		76.1	76.1	74.8	-1.3	78.1	88.1	77	122	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		67.9	75.0	68.0	-7.0	81.3	84.0	73	32	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		57.9	58.5	57.1	-1.4	75.4	79.0	73	126	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		72.7	77.0	75.4	-1.6	84.1	86.4	79	56	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		83.0	-	-	-	-	91.5	-	29	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		83.0	87.8	86.7	-1.1	90.1	91.5	73	530	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		72.3	77.0	75.2	-1.8	83.8	86.2	51	305	25	No Change
High needs		59.4	63.4	64.6	1.2	76.3	79.7	70	96	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		69.6	69.6	67.1	-2.5	72.1	84.8	67	54	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		53.6	51.2	60.6	9.4	72.9	76.8	79	52	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		61.9	66.7	62.0	-4.7	77.8	81.0	71	25	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		73.6	78.4	76.5	-1.9	84.6	86.8	41	237	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	15.0	15.3	661	0	4.1	3.0	661	25
High needs	4.7	4.4	227	0	10.2	7.0	227	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.8	6.5	123	25	8.7	8.1	123	0
EL and Former EL	3.1	3.1	32	0	18.8	15.6	32	25
Students w/ disabilities	2.5	1.6	126	0	18.3	11.1	126	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Hispanic/Latino	4.0	12.5	56	25	8.0	5.4	56	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	29	-	-	-	29	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	15.3	15.5	530	0	3.2	2.6	530	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	36.6	34.5	661	0	10.1	9.8	661	0
High needs	18.6	14.2	226	0	23.7	25.2	226	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	22.3	17.2	122	0	17.3	20.5	122	0
EL and Former EL	25.0	9.4	32	0	28.1	25.0	32	25
Students w/ disabilities	7.5	8.7	126	25	40.0	41.3	126	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Hispanic/Latino	26.0	25.0	56	0	22.0	16.1	56	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	29	-	-	-	29	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	38.2	36.4	530	0	8.2	9.1	530	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	10.8	6.9	305	0	12.3	9.8	305	25
High needs	5.0	2.1	96	0	26.1	22.9	96	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	4.3	3.7	54	0	17.4	20.4	54	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Students w/ disabilities	3.2	0.0	52	0	44.4	30.8	52	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Hispanic/Latino	3.7	4.0	25	0	18.5	16.0	25	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	11.9	6.8	237	0	11.9	8.0	237	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		54.0	48.0	-6.0	51.0	No	641	50	Below Target
High needs		48.5	45.0	-3.5	51.0	No	212	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		47.0	36.0	-11.0	51.0	No	116	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		57.0	53.0	-4.0	51.0	No	32	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		47.0	47.0	0.0	51.0	No	114	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	22	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		49.5	52.0	2.5	51.0	Yes	55	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	28	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		54.0	47.0	-7.0	51.0	No	515	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		58.5	51.0	-7.5	51.0	No	641	75	On Target
High needs		55.5	48.0	-7.5	51.0	No	211	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		55.0	48.5	-6.5	51.0	No	116	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		56.5	45.5	-11.0	51.0	No	32	50	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		52.0	46.0	-6.0	51.0	No	113	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	22	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		52.0	45.0	-7.0	51.0	No	55	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	29	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		60.0	51.0	-9.0	51.0	No	514	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	8.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	8.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	8.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	674	673	100	Yes	674	673	100	Yes	308	308	100	Yes
High needs	233	233	100	Yes	233	232	100	Yes	98	98	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	129	129	100	Yes	129	128	99	Yes	56	56	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	34	34	100	Yes	34	34	100	Yes	16	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	128	128	100	Yes	128	128	100	Yes	52	52	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	23	-	-	-	23	-	-	-	13	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	25	-	-	-	25	-	-	-	12	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	59	59	100	Yes	59	59	100	Yes	25	25	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	31	31	100	Yes	31	31	100	Yes	19	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	536	535	100	Yes	536	535	100	Yes	239	239	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.