Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Ashland High

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Ashland High

Organization Information

District:

Ashland (00140000)

School type:

High School

School:

Ashland High (00140505)

Grades served:

09,10,11,12

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		98.5	99.6	99.9	0.3	99.1	99.3	97	171	100	Above Target
High needs		92.9	98.3	99.4	1.1	95.9	96.5	97	40	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		90.0	97.1	99.1	2.0	94.2	95.0	96	29	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		99.2	99.5	99.8	0.3	99.5	99.6	87	131	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		96.9	99.0	99.4	0.4	98.2	98.5	99	171	100	Above Target
High needs		86.8	96.1	97.5	1.4	92.3	93.4	99	40	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		85.0	94.4	96.6	2.2	91.3	92.5	99	29	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		97.4	98.9	99.6	0.7	98.5	98.7	99	131	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		95.6	95.8	98.6	2.8	97.4	97.8	95	165	100	Above Target
High needs		88.2	85.4	93.6	8.2	93.1	94.1	93	35	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	24	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		96.5	95.9	98.8	2.9	98.0	98.3	95	130	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	72.0	69.0	171	0	0.0	0.0	171	25
High needs	40.9	32.5	40	0	0.0	0.0	40	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Students w/ disabilities	19.2	24.1	29	25	0.0	0.0	29	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	74.4	71.8	131	0	0.0	0.0	131	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	78.1	78.4	171	0	0.0	0.0	171	25
High needs	62.2	45.0	40	0	0.0	0.0	40	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Students w/ disabilities	44.4	34.5	29	0	0.0	0.0	29	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	79.0	78.6	131	0	0.0	0.0	131	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	33.3	60.6	165	25	0.0	0.0	165	25
High needs	17.1	31.4	35	25	0.0	0.0	35	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	24	-	-	-	24	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	35.7	58.5	130	25	0.0	0.0	130	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		58.5	67.0	8.5	51.0	Yes	164	100	Above Target
High needs		50.0	68.5	18.5	51.0	Yes	38	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	29	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		57.0	66.0	9.0	51.0	Yes	128	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		65.0	77.0	12.0	51.0	Yes	165	100	Above Target
High needs		72.0	87.0	15.0	51.0	Yes	39	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		80.0	85.0	5.0	51.0	Yes	29	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		63.5	77.0	13.5	51.0	Yes	129	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	5.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	5.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	5.00	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		96.9	92.6	-4.3	80.0	90.0	175	75	On Target
High needs		91.9	83.6	-8.3	80.0	90.0	61	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		87.9	77.5	-10.4	80.0	90.0	40	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	11	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
White		97.9	93.2	-4.7	80.0	90.0	147	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		96.1	96.9	0.8	85.0	95.0	191	100	Above Target
High needs		90.4	91.9	1.5	85.0	95.0	62	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		86.1	87.9	1.8	85.0	95.0	33	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	15	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	15	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
White		95.7	97.9	2.2	85.0	95.0	145	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		0.6	0.7	0.6	0.1	0.4	0.3	66	719	25	No Change
High needs		0.7	2.2	2.6	-0.4	0.4	0.4	41	151	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	52	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		1.3	3.9	2.0	1.9	0.8	0.7	52	98	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	38	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	43	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		0.6	0.3	0.3	0.0	0.4	0.3	73	601	75	On Target

Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more) About the Data
	2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged	PPI Points
All students	-	-
High needs	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	175	173	99	Yes	177	175	99	Yes	177	175	99	Yes
High needs	41	41	100	Yes	41	41	100	Yes	41	41	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	14	-	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	30	30	100	Yes	30	30	100	Yes	30	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Asian	18	-	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	12	-	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	133	131	98	Yes	135	133	99	Yes	135	134	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.