Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Thompson

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Thompson

Organization Information
District:Arlington (00100000)School type:Elementary School
School:Thompson (00100050)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.4, Target = 94.9CPI = 91.4, Target = 94.9CPI = 91.4, Target = 94.9 91.2 93.6 91.4 -2.2 94.9 95.6 7618325No Change
High needsCPI = 82.4, Target = 87.6CPI = 82.4, Target = 87.6CPI = 82.4, Target = 87.6 78.8 86.9 82.4 -4.5 87.6 89.4 80610Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 83.3, Target = 87.8CPI = 83.3, Target = 87.8CPI = 83.3, Target = 87.8 86.7 86.7 83.3 -3.4 87.8 93.4 81360Declined
EL and Former ELCPI = 79.8, Target = 87.6CPI = 79.8, Target = 87.6CPI = 79.8, Target = 87.6 78.8 84.5 79.8 -4.7 87.6 89.4 78260Declined
Students w/ disabilities -------23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian  89.7---- 94.9-27--
Afr. Amer./Black -------10--
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.5, Target = 96.4CPI = 93.5, Target = 96.4CPI = 93.5, Target = 96.4 93.9 95.0 93.5 -1.5 96.4 97.0 8211675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.8, Target = 94.3CPI = 89.8, Target = 94.3CPI = 89.8, Target = 94.3 90.3 88.5 89.8 1.3 94.3 95.2 6918250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 78.7, Target = 89CPI = 78.7, Target = 89CPI = 78.7, Target = 89 81.1 78.5 78.7 0.2 89.0 90.6 626150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 71.5, Target = 80.1CPI = 71.5, Target = 80.1CPI = 71.5, Target = 80.1 78.3 78.3 71.5 -6.8 80.1 89.2 30360Declined
EL and Former ELCPI = 71.2, Target = 89.9CPI = 71.2, Target = 89.9CPI = 71.2, Target = 89.9 82.7 78.4 71.2 -7.2 89.9 91.4 42260Declined
Students w/ disabilities -------23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian  91.4---- 95.7-27--
Afr. Amer./Black -------10--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.8, Target = 95.2CPI = 93.8, Target = 95.2CPI = 93.8, Target = 95.2 91.8 91.1 93.8 2.7 95.2 95.9 8311675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.3, Target = 90.3CPI = 89.3, Target = 90.3 83.3 92.4 89.3 -3.1 90.3 91.7 815675On Target
High needs -------19--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilities -------6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------9--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.6, Target = 91.4CPI = 93.6, Target = 91.4CPI = 93.6, Target = 91.4 85.3 92.7 93.6 0.9 91.4 92.7 9135100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 32.5 27.31830 1.3 2.21830
High needs 12.3 4.9610 3.1 4.9610
Econ. Disadvantaged 15.6 8.3360 2.2 5.6360
EL and Former EL 10.3 0.0260 3.4 3.8260
Students w/ disabilities--23---23-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--27---27-
Afr. Amer./Black--10---10-
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--15---15-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 39.0 35.31160 1.0 1.71160
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 42.8 43.41820 4.4 6.01820
High needs 23.4 13.1610 10.9 14.8610
Econ. Disadvantaged 24.4 11.1360 11.1 22.2360
EL and Former EL 17.2 15.4260 10.3 26.9260
Students w/ disabilities--23---23-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--27---27-
Afr. Amer./Black--10---10-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--15---15-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 50.0 52.61160 4.8 2.611625
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 41.1 44.6560 1.8 5.4560
High needs--19---19-
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities--6---6-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--9---9-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 46.3 57.13525 2.4 2.9350
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 64.0 56.0 -8.0 51.0No10075On Target
High needsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 61.0 53.0 -8.0 51.0No3575On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 64.0 55.0 -9.0 51.0No2575On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-14--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-15--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-6--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 51 65.5 70.0 4.5 51.0No59100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 36.5, Target = 51SGP = 36.5, Target = 51SGP = 36.5, Target = 51 48.0 36.5 -11.5 51.0Yes10075On Target
High needsSGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51 30.0 31.0 1.0 51.0No3650Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 26, Target = 51SGP = 26, Target = 51SGP = 26, Target = 51 40.0 26.0 -14.0 51.0No250Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-14--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-15--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-6--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 38.5, Target = 51SGP = 38.5, Target = 51SGP = 38.5, Target = 51 53.0 38.5 -14.5 51.0Yes6075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 57.0 60.0330
High needs 57.0 60.0330
EL and Former EL 57.0 60.0330
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students19419198Yes19419098Yes585697Yes
High needs686799Yes686799Yes20---
Econ. Disadvantaged3838100Yes3838100Yes14---
EL and Former EL3030100Yes3030100Yes8---
Students w/ disabilities24---24---6---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian3030100Yes3030100Yes9---
Afr. Amer./Black10---10---4---
Hispanic/Latino14---14---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.15---15---7---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White12412198Yes12412198Yes363597Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles