Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Wood Hill Middle School

District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Wood Hill Middle School

Organization Information
District:Andover (00090000)School type:Middle School
School:Wood Hill Middle School (00090350)Grades served:06,07,08
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 97.3, Target = 97.8 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 97.3, Target = 97.875 or Higher All Students 96.3 94.1 97.3 3.2 97.8 98.2 95408100Above Target
High needsCPI = 91, Target = 91.1 - High needsHigh needs-CPI = 91, Target = 91.175 or Higher High needs 84.8 80.4 91.0 10.6 91.1 92.4 9611475On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 94.4, Target = 82.2 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 94.4, Target = 82.2CPI = 94.4, Target = 82.275 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 80.6 80.6 94.4 13.8 82.2 90.3 9531100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------12--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 88.9, Target = 90 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 88.9, Target = 90 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 82.9 75.9 88.9 13.0 90.0 91.5 978375On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 98.8, Target = 99.3 - AsianAsian-CPI = 98.8, Target = 99.375 or Higher Asian 98.8 98.6 98.8 0.2 99.3 99.4 83101100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------13--
Hispanic/Latino -------22--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 97.6, Target = 97.8 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 97.6, Target = 97.875 or Higher White 96.3 94.2 97.6 3.4 97.8 98.2 95264100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91, Target = 94.8 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 91, Target = 94.8 75 or Higher All Students 91.0 89.5 91.0 1.5 94.8 95.5 8940775On Target
High needsCPI = 76.1, Target = 83.3 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 76.1, Target = 83.3 75 or Higher High needs 71.4 66.8 76.1 9.3 83.3 85.7 9111475On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 83.9, Target = 73.7 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 83.9, Target = 73.7CPI = 83.9, Target = 73.775 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 71.3 71.3 83.9 12.6 73.7 85.7 9531100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------12--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 71.4, Target = 81.2 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 71.4, Target = 81.2 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 67.8 61.9 71.4 9.5 81.2 83.9 948375On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 96.5, Target = 99.1 - Asian75 or Higher AsianAsian CPI = 96.5, Target = 99.1 75 or Higher Asian 98.4 97.2 96.5 -0.7 99.1 99.2 69101100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------13--
Hispanic/Latino -------22--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.3, Target = 94.7 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 91.3, Target = 94.7 75 or Higher White 90.9 89.7 91.3 1.6 94.7 95.5 87263100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80.2, Target = 90.7 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 80.2, Target = 90.7 75 or Higher All Students 84.1 83.1 80.2 -2.9 90.7 92.1 721160Declined
High needsCPI = 61.3, Target = 76.8 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 61.3, Target = 76.8 75 or Higher High needs 60.2 63.3 61.3 -2.0 76.8 80.1 513125No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------5--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 60.2, Target = 81 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 60.2, Target = 81 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 67.4 62.5 60.2 -2.3 81.0 83.7 772725No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 90, Target = 94.9 - Asian75 or Higher AsianAsian CPI = 90, Target = 94.9 75 or Higher Asian 91.3 89.3 90.0 0.7 94.9 95.7 5325100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 80, Target = 91.4 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 80, Target = 91.4 75 or Higher White 85.2 82.5 80.0 -2.5 91.4 92.6 618025No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 26.6 39.540825 2.9 1.240825
High needs 3.9 14.911425 11.8 4.411425
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.7 25.83125 18.5 3.23125
EL and Former EL--12---12-
Students w/ disabilities 2.5 7.28325 15.0 4.88325
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 46.1 65.310125 0.0 1.01010
Afr. Amer./Black--13---13-
Hispanic/Latino--22---22-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.6 32.626425 2.4 1.126425
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 44.7 51.140725 6.9 3.940725
High needs 12.0 21.111425 27.0 13.211425
Econ. Disadvantaged 22.2 25.83125 22.2 9.73125
EL and Former EL--12---12-
Students w/ disabilities 5.1 14.58325 32.1 15.78325
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 75.3 85.110125 1.1 4.01010
Afr. Amer./Black--13---13-
Hispanic/Latino--22---22-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 38.0 42.626325 6.3 2.726325
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 3.0 9.511625 4.4 7.81160
High needs 0.0 3.23125 20.0 25.8310
Econ. Disadvantaged--5---5-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0270 23.1 25.9270
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 7.1 20.02525 0.0 8.0250
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 2.1 6.38025 4.1 5.0800
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 66, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 45.0 66.0 21.0 51.0Yes394100Above Target
High needsSGP = 63, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 33.5 63.0 29.5 51.0Yes104100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-29--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-10--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 64, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities-SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 5175 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 36.0 64.0 28.0 51.0Yes74100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
AsianSGP = 77, Target = 51 - AsianAsian-SGP = 77, Target = 51SGP = 77, Target = 5175 or Higher Asian 65.0 77.0 12.0 51.0Yes99100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-13--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 64, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 5175 or Higher White 41.0 64.0 23.0 51.0Yes255100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 63, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 53.0 63.0 10.0 51.0No391100Above Target
High needsSGP = 53, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 41.0 53.0 12.0 51.0Yes10375On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-29--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-10--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 48, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities SGP = 48, Target = 51 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 44.5 48.0 3.5 51.0Yes7375On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
AsianSGP = 78, Target = 51 - AsianAsian-SGP = 78, Target = 51SGP = 78, Target = 5175 or Higher Asian 58.0 78.0 20.0 51.0Yes99100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-13--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 61, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 5175 or Higher White 51.0 61.0 10.0 51.0No252100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.07.00-
High needs- 60.07.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.07.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students42241899Yes42241699Yes12011999Yes
High needs12211897Yes12211796Yes3232100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged333297Yes333297Yes5---
EL and Former EL14---14---1---
Students w/ disabilities898596Yes898596Yes2828100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian103103100Yes10310299Yes2525100Yes
Afr. Amer./Black13---13---4---
Hispanic/Latino24---24---5---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.9---9---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White27327099Yes27326999Yes838299Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles